DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사상체질별(四象體質別) 학습특성(學習特性)의 차이(差異) 연구(硏究)

The Differences of Learning Characteristics in Sasang Constitution

  • 최우창 (우석대학교 한의과대학 한방신경정신과학교실) ;
  • 김우경 (우석대학교 한의과대학 한방신경정신과학교실) ;
  • 송정모 (우석대학교 한의과대학 사상체질의학교실) ;
  • 김락형 (우석대학교 한의과대학 한방신경정신과학교실)
  • Choi, Woo-Chang (Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, College of Korean Medicine, Woo-Suk University) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Kyoung (Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, College of Korean Medicine, Woo-Suk University) ;
  • Song, Jeong-Mo (Department of Sasang Constitutional Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Woo-Suk University) ;
  • Kim, Lak-Hyung (Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, College of Korean Medicine, Woo-Suk University)
  • 투고 : 2013.05.20
  • 심사 : 2013.06.04
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30

초록

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of Sasang constitutional types in the university students. Methods : One hundred fifty students of Woosuk University participated in this study and their majors were Korean medicine, nursing science and pharmacy. The Sasang constitutional types were determined by the results of Two Step Questionnaire for Sasang Constitution Diagnosis (TS-QSCD). The subjects were also tested by Academic Motivation Tests (AMT), Multi-dimensional Learning Strategy Tests (MLST) and Learning Style Questionnaire of Sasang Constitution (LSQ-SC). The subscale scores of AMT, MSLT and each questions of AMT, MLST, LSQ-SC were compared among the different Sasang constitutions using analysis of variances (ANOVA). Results : There were no significant differences in AMT results between Sasang constitutions. In subscales of AMT, Feeling scales (FTF) scores of Soyangin was significantly higher than Taeeumin. Other subscales of AMT were not different between Sasang constitutions. There were no significant differences in MLST results between Sasang constitutions. Subscales of MLST were not different between Sasang constitutions. There were many questions between Soyangin and other constitutions in the analysis of questions of AMT, MLST, and LSQ-SC, and less between Taeeumin and Soeumin. Conclusions : These results suggest that the characteristics of Soyangin is more prominent compared with other constitutions in the learning style, and there were a little differences between Soeumin and Taeeumin.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee YJ. An Analysis of Interrelationship among Language Learning Strategies, Learning Styles, and Learner Variables of EFL University Students. Master's thesis of Graduate School of Education, Inha University; 2008.
  2. Jung HK, Kim MS, Yoo YJ, et al. A Study on the Relationship Between Personality, Learning Attitude and Academic Achievement of Nursing Students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2007;13(4):516-25.
  3. Kim BO. (The) Effect of Self-Regulatory Learning Strategy Training on Child Learning Motivation and Learning Set. Master's thesis of Graduate School of Education, Gyeongin National University of Education; 2004.
  4. Sim YY. (The) Effect of Reality Therapy Group Counseling on Internal Locus of Control and Learning Motivation of Elementary School Student. Master's Thesis of Graduate School of Education, Gwangju National University of Education; 2006.
  5. Ann MC, Kevin JW, David M. Meaningful Learning, Reasoning Ability, and Students' Understanding and Problem Solving of Topics in Genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1996;33(6):625-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<625::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Q
  6. Boujaoude SB. The Relationship between Students' Learning Strategies and the Change in Their Misunderstanding during a High School Chemistry Course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1992;29(7):687-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290706
  7. Kim MG. A Study on Psycho-pathologic Features of Sa-sang Constitutions. Ph.D. Thesis of Kyung- Hee University; 2010.
  8. Kim JW, Kim JH, Hwang WW. Clinical Study on Personality Characteristics of the Alcoholic Patients -with MMPI & Sasang Constitution. Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry. 1992;3(2):65-85.
  9. Kim JW, Kim JW, Koh BH, et al. A Study of Ssang Constitution Discrimination and Personal Characteristics in Sasang Constitution according to Comparative Analysis of QSCC. The Journal of The Korean Oriental Medical Society. 1994;15(1):66-74.
  10. Choi DS, Kim LH, Sung WY, et al. Characteristics of each Sasang Constitutional Type as Assessed by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine. 2011;23(3):351-60.
  11. Chae H, Lee SJ, Park SJ, et al. Neurotic Characteristics of Sasang Types with SCL-90-R. Korean Journal of Oriental Physiology & Pathology. 2010;24(4):722-6.
  12. Song MS, Baek JU, Choi CH. Study of Psychological Traits in Sasang Constitution According to QSCC II, MBTI, STAI -Preliminary Study for Yangsaeng in Sasang Constitution-. Korean Journal of Oriental Preventive Medical Society. 2009;13(2):65-76.
  13. Lim J, Lee IS, Koh BH, et al. A Study on the Sasang Constitutional Characteristics of Obese Middle-Aged Women. Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine. 2004;16(3):59-69.
  14. Seo W, Kim LH, Kwon BH, et al. A Study on the Psychological Characteristics of Sasang Constitution by Using BDI and STAI. Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine. 2000;12(1):136-43.
  15. Shin EJ. Decision Making Style and Learning Style according to Sasang Constitution. Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry. 2009;20(4):115-26.
  16. Jung SK, Joo KH. Efficient Learning Method through an Analysis of Learning pattern based on the Sasang Constitution. Summer Conference Journal of Korea Association of Information Education. 2009:123-6.
  17. Kim JH. Chejil-eul Almyeon Udeungsaeng-i doenda. Shina Publisher; 2004.
  18. Kim MG. Uli Ai Gongbubigyeol Chejil-e Sumeoissda. Book&World; 2005.
  19. Kim YW, Shin DY, Kim JH, et al. A Development of the Two Step Questionnaire for the Sasang Constitution Diagnosis (TS-QSCD). Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine. 2006;18(1):75-90.
  20. Shin DY, Song JM. A Study on the Standardization of TS-QSCD. Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine. 2009;21(1):99-126.
  21. Kim AY. Development of Standardized Student Motivation Scales. Korean Journal of Educational Evaluation. 2002;15(1):157-84.
  22. Kim AY, Park IY. Construction and Validation of Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. The Journal of Educational Research. 2001;39(1):95-123.
  23. Kim AY. Study on the Development of Korean Academic Failure Tolerance Measure. The Journal of Educational Research. 1994;32(3):59-75.
  24. Park DH. Wee Project and Diagnosis of Learning Problems Using the MLST. Counseling and Guidance. 2010;45:133-42.
  25. Albert Bandura. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall; 1986.
  26. Kim AY, Cha JE. Multi-level Analysis of the Effects of Teacher-efficacy and Students' Academic Self-efficacy on Academic Achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003;17(2):25-43.
  27. Kim AY, Clifford MM. Goal Source, Goal Difficulty, and Individual Difference Variables as Predictors of Responses to Failure. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1988;58(1):28-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00876.x
  28. Clifford MM. Thoughts on a Theory of Constructive Failure. Educational Psychologist. 1984;19(2):108-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529286
  29. Kim AY. A Study on the Academic Failure-tolerance and Its Correlates. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 1997;11(2):1-19.
  30. Chung CO, Kang MH. The Effects of Self - Regulated Learning on Academic Achievement in Normally Achieving and Learning Disabled Children. Journal of Korean Association of Child Studies. 1996;17(2):141-61.
  31. Kim YC. Management Thinking. The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving. 1991; 1(1):1-13.

피인용 문헌

  1. 사상체질에 따른 성격강점 차이연구 vol.28, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7231/jon.2017.28.1.039