Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Community Ambulation Training on the Gait Ability and Stroke Impact Scale in Stroke Patients

지역사회 보행 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 보행 능력과 뇌졸중 영향 척도에 미치는 효과

  • Ji, Sang-Goo (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Eulji University Hospital) ;
  • Cha, Hyun-Gyu (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Eulji University Hospital)
  • 지상구 (을지대학교병원 재활센터) ;
  • 차현규 (을지대학교병원 재활센터)
  • Received : 2013.03.21
  • Accepted : 2013.06.07
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effect of community ambulation training and treadmill training on the gait ability and stroke impact scale in patients with hemiplegia due to stroke. Twenty-two patients with hemiplegia due to stroke were assigned to the community ambulation training group(n=11) or treadmill training group(n=11). Both groups were executed conventional treatment for 5 times per week for 6 weeks 30 minutes per session. Each group performed additional exercise for 30 minutes. Post treatment, compared to the treadmill training group, community ambulation training group showed significantly increased velocity, cadence, stroke impact scale(p<.05). These results support the perceived benefits of community ambulation training to augment on the gait ability and stroke impact scale of stroke patients. Therefore, community ambulation training is feasible and suitable for stroke patients.

본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자에게 지역사회 보행 훈련과 트레드밀 보행 훈련이 보행 능력과 뇌졸중 영향 척도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보기 위하여 실시하였다. 본 연구에는 총 22명의 뇌졸중 환자가 참여하였으며, 대상자들은 무작위 추출법으로 지역사회 보행 훈련군 11명과 트레드밀 보행 훈련군 11명으로 각각 배정되었다. 모든 대상자들은 전통적 물리치료를 6주 동안 주 5회, 하루 30분씩 시행하였으며, 지역사회 보행 훈련과 트레드밀 보행 훈련을 하루에 30분씩 각각 추가적으로 실시하였다. 연구 결과 지역사회 보행 훈련군이 트레드밀 보행 훈련군에 비해 보행 속도와 분속수, 뇌졸중 영향 척도에서 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<.05). 이것은 지역사회 보행 훈련이 트레드밀 보행 훈련에 비해 뇌졸중 환자의 보행 능력과 뇌졸중 영향 척도에 유익한 영향을 준 것이라고 할 수 있다. 따라서 지역사회 보행 훈련은 뇌졸중 환자에게 실행 가능하며 적합한 훈련이 될 수 있을 것이라고 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. W. Saunders, D. Rath, and P. W. Hodges. "Postural and respiratory activatin of the trunk muscles change with mode and speed of locomation", Gait Posture, Vol. 20(3), pp. 280-290, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.10.003
  2. K. H. Mauritz. "Gait training in hemiplegia", Eur J Neurol, Vol. 9(1), pp. 23-29, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.0090s1023.x
  3. G. Chen and C. Patten. "Treadmill training with harness support: selection of parameters for individuals with poststroke hemiparesis", J Rehabil Res Dev, Vol. 43(4), pp. 485-498, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0063
  4. K. Hill, P. Ellis and J. Berngardt. "Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: A comprehensive audit", Aust J Physiother, Vol. 43(3), pp. 173-180, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60408-6
  5. M. Pohl, J. Mehrholz, C. Ristschel and S. Ruckriem. "Speed dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial" Stroke, Vol. 33(2), pp. 553-558, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/hs0202.102365
  6. J. Perry, M. Garrett and J. K. Gronley. "Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population" stroke, Vol. 26(6), pp. 982-989, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.982
  7. L. Ada, C. M. Dean, J. M. Hall and J. Bampton. "A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: a placebo-controlled randomized trial", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 84(10), pp. 1486-1491, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00349-6
  8. S. E. Lord, K. McPherson, H. K. McNaughton, L. Rochester and M. Weatherall. "Community ambulation after stroke: Ho important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?" Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 85(2), pp. 234-239, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.002
  9. S. Hesse, C. Bertelt, M. T. Jahnke and A. Schaffrin. "Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients", Stroke, Vol. 26(6), pp. 976-981, 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.976
  10. H. G. Cha, J. Y. Park, S. G. Ji, M. K. Kim and D. G. Lee. "The effect of visual feedback training integrated mental practice on the balance function and walking ability of hemiplegia", J Spec Edu & Rehabil Sci, Vol. 51(2), pp. 337-354, 2012.
  11. S. Hesse, T. Platz and K. H. Mauritz. "Indication for optimal use of orthoses in the treatment of hemiparetic patients", Biomed Tech(Berl), Vol. 35(3), pp. 52-53, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bmte.1990.35.s3.52
  12. B. H. Dobkin. "Strategies for stroke rehabilitation", Neuro, Vol. 3, pp. 528-536, 2004.
  13. M. Anne, S. Angela and P. Alex. "Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke", Stroke, Vol. 34, pp. 3006, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000102415.43108.66
  14. A. M. Jones and J. H. A. Doust. "1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running", J Sprots Sci, Vol. 14(4), pp. 321-327, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026404196367796
  15. P. Pound, P. Gompertz and S. Ebrahim. "A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke", Clin Rehabil, Vol. 12(4), pp. 338-347, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/026921598677661555
  16. F. Alton, L. Baldey and S. Caplan. "A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking and treadmill walking", Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), Vol. 13(6), pp. 434-440, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00012-6
  17. J. R. Nymark, S. J. Balmer, E. H. Melis, E. D. Lemaire and S. Millar. "Electromyographic and kinematic nondisabled gait differences at extremely slow overground and treadmill walking speeds", J Rehabil Res Dev, Vol. 42(4), pp. 523-534, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2004.05.0059
  18. C. S. Robinett and M. A. Vondran. "Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities: A clinical report", Phys Ther, Vol. 68(9), pp. 1371-1373, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/68.9.1371
  19. A. Shumway-Cook, A. E. Patla, A. Stewart, L. Ferrucci, M. A. Ciol and J. M. Guralnik. "Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities", Phys ther, Vol. 82(7), pp. 670-681, 2002.
  20. Y. R. Yang, M. P. Tsai, T. Y. Chuang, W. H. Sung and R. Y. Wang. "Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: A randomized controlled trial", Gait Posture, Vol. 28(2), pp. 201-206, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.007
  21. Y. R. Yang, Y. C. Chen and C. S. Lee. "Dual-task-related gait changes in individual with stroke", Gait Posture, Vol. 25(2), pp. 185-190, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.007
  22. P. Duncan, S. Studenski, L. Richards, S. Gollub, S. M. Lai, D. Reker, S. Perera, J. Yates, V. Koch and S. Rigler. "Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke" Stroke, Vol. 34(9), pp. 2173-2180, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000083699.95351.F2
  23. S. E. Lord and L. Rochester. "Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: Current status and future developments", Stroke, Vol. 36(7), pp. 1457-1461, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000170698.20376.2e
  24. H. J. Park and H. S. Cho. "Effectiveness of community ambulation training for patients with post-stroke hemiparesis", J Korean Neur Rehabil, Vol. 1(2), pp. 54-62, 2011.
  25. J. S. Winter. "Clinical, biochemical and molecular aspects of 17-hydroxylase deficiency", Endoer Res, Vol. 17(1-2), pp. 53-62, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07435809109027189
  26. C. D. Cozean, W. S. Pease and S. L. Hubbell. "Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation instroke rehabilitation", Arch Phys Med Regabil, Vol. 69(6), pp. 401-405, 1988.
  27. M. G. Bowedn, C. K. Balasubramanian and R. R. Neptune. "Anterior posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemi paretic walking", Stroke, Vol. 37(3), pp. 872-876, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d
  28. R. J. De Haan, M. Limburg, J. H. P. Van der Meulen and H. M. Jacobs. "Quality of life after stroke. Impact of stroke type and lesion location", Stroke, Vol. 26(3), pp. 402-408, 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.3.402
  29. J. Carod-Artal, J. A. Egido, J. L. Gonzalez and E. V. de Seijas. "Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit", Stroke, Vol. 31(12), pp. 2995-3000, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.12.2995
  30. S. M. Lai, S. Perera, P. W. Duncan and R. Bode. "Physical and social functioning after stroke: Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36", Stoke, Vol. 34(2), pp. 488-493, 2003.
  31. N. F. Gordon, M. Gulanick, F. Costa, G. Fletcher, B. A. Franklin, E. J. Roth and T. Shephard. "Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; The Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council", Stroke, Vol. 35(5), pp. 1230-1240, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000127303.19261.19

Cited by

  1. Effects of Group Task-Oriented Circuit Training on Motor Function, ADLs and Quality of Life in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Case Study vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.3.1894