DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective Evaluation of Implant Retained Overdentures Using Two Implants and Locator Attachments in the Edentulous Mandibles

Locator attachment를 이용한 하악 임플란트 유지 피개의치의 후향적 평가

  • Lee, Ju-Hyoung (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Sohn, Dong-Seok (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Lee, Cheong-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 이주형 (대구가톨릭의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 손동석 (대구가톨릭의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이청희 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2013.04.21
  • Accepted : 2013.06.25
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

This study compared the marginal bone loss around dental implants that were placed in the canine areas of the mandibles and finded the survival rate of the implants, marginal bone loss around implants and prosthetic complications in 20 patients treated with overdentures retained with Locator attachments. Implants placed in this study showed a 95% survival rate and the average marginal bone loss was 1.21 mm($SD{\pm}0.60mm$) in 94.3 weeks of functional loading. Implant-retained overdentures had various prosthetic complications such as male change, metal cap loosening, Locator attachment loosening, denture teeth change, relining and denture fracture. Implant-retained overdentures using two implants and Locator attachments in the edentulous mandibles is considered as a stable way for long terms because of minimal invasive operation, simple prosthetic process and easy repair.

이번 연구는 2개의 임플란트 식립 후 로케이터를 이용한 하악 임플란트 유지 피개의치를 한 20명의 환자를 대상으로 임플란트 생존율, 변연골 흡수량, 보철적 합병증을 알아보았다. 진료 기록부를 조사하고 방사선 사진을 계측하여 후향적 임상연구를 하였으며, 임플란트는 95%의 누적 생존율을 보였고, 평균 94주 후 방사선 사진에서 임플란트는 평균 1.21 mm($SD{\pm}0.20mm$)의 골소실을 보였다. 보철적 합병증으로는 피개의치 파절, 의치상 이장 또는 개상, 메일의 탈락 또는 유지력 감소로 인한 메일 교체 등이 있었다. 그러나 의치상 이장 및 개상, 메일 인써트의 간단한 교체로 인해 장기적으로 임플란트 및 임플란트 유지 피개의치가 환자에게 유지되고 있었다. Locator를 이용한 하악 임플란트 유지 피개의치는 최소침습적인 수술, 간단한 보철 과정 및 수리 과정의 장점으로 인해 장기적으로 안정적인 치료법으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:108-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
  2. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(3):195-202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x
  3. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van't Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(3):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x
  4. Thomason JM. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2002;10(3):95-6.
  5. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering AH. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(1):9-18. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050102.x
  6. Kim SO. Implant Overdenture. Seoul: Myung Moon Publishing;2007 p.115-8, 344-50.
  7. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(3):161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  8. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  9. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(7):628-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007628.x
  10. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  11. Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2(2):91-100.
  12. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Calberson L, Demanet M. A prospective evaluation of the fate of 697 consecutive intraoral fixtures ad modum Brånemark in the rehabilitation of edentulism. J Head Neck Pathol. 1987;6:53-8.
  13. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4):347-59.
  14. Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, Hutton JE, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Herrmann I. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7(4):513-522.
  15. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part Ⅰ: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9(3):170-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090304.x
  16. Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4):375-83.
  17. Cooper LF, Scurria MS, Lang LA, Guckes AD, Moriarty JD, Felton DA. Treatment of edentulism using Astra Tech implants and ball abutments to retain mandibular overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(5):646-53.
  18. Roe P, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL. Kleinman AS, Goodacre CJ, Chen JW. Immediate loading of unsplinted implants in the anterior mandible for overdentures: 3-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(6):1296-1302.
  19. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27(2):120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  20. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Smith DG. Complications and maintenance requirements of implant-supported prostheses provided in a UK dental hospital. Br Dent J. 1997;182(8):298-302. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809371