Evaluation of Railway Line Segment Deterioration Using AHP and DEA

AHP와 DEA를 활용한 철도선로구간 노후도 평가

  • Kim, Seongho (Department of Business Administration, Inha University) ;
  • Choi, Chan-Yong (High speed Railway Research Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Na, Hee-Seung (New Transportation System Research Center, Korea Railroad Research Institute)
  • Received : 2012.11.23
  • Accepted : 2013.02.13
  • Published : 2013.04.28


Railway line segment deterioration can be affected by rail tracks, subgrades, bridges, tunnels, and line shapes. In this paper, an evaluation method is presented for the railway line segment deterioration using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). The importance weights can be assessed systematically for component facilities from numerous experts using AHP. The importance weights provided by experts may differ according to each expert; however, the DEA enables the evaluation of railway line segment deterioration that reflects the variety of expert opinions using these importance weights.


Supported by : 한국철도기술연구원


  1. T. Sato, A. Sutoh, H. Nishi, H. Arai (2011) Identification of correlation between demand performances to damage of lining concrete for tunnel management, Procedia Engineering, 14, pp. 529-534.
  2. Y.G. Park, S.K. Suh, J.Y. Choi (2008) Logicality estimate for domestic the periodic replacement criteria of CWR based on accumulated passing tonnage, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 11(3), pp. 326-333.
  3. Y.G. Park, D.Y. Sung, H.K. Park, S.Y. Kong (2008) Bending fatigue life assessment of aged CWR using the field test, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 11(3), pp. 317-325.
  4. S. Sasmal, K. Ramanjaneyulu (2008) Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), pp. 1430-1443.
  5. S. Kim (2011) Deterioration evaluation of railway line segments using analytic hierarchy process, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 16(6), pp. 569-574.
  6. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E.L. Rhodes (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp. 429-444.
  7. M. Oral, O. Kettani, P. Lang (1991) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects, Management Science, 37(7), pp. 871-883.
  8. R.G. Thompson, F.D. Singleton, Jr., R.M. Thrall, B.A. Smith (1986) Comparative site evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in texas, Interfaces, 16(6), pp. 35-49.
  9. W.D. Cook, Y. Roll, A. Kazakov (1990) A dea model for measuring the relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols, INFOR, 28(2), pp. 113-124.
  10. R.G. Thompson, L.N. Langemeier, C.-T. Lee, E. Lee, R.M. Thrall (1990) The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to kansas farming, Journal of Econometrics, 46(1/2), pp. 93-108.
  11. P. Andersen, N.C. Petersen (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 39(10), pp. 1261-1264.
  12. R. Allen, A. Athanassopoulos, R.G. Dyson, E. Thanassoulis (1997) Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions, Annals of Operations Research, 73, pp. 13-34.

Cited by

  1. Practical Evaluation Technique for Deterioration of Railroad Lines using Track Geometry vol.17, pp.2, 2014,
  2. Evaluating efficiency of passenger railway stations: A DEA approach vol.20, 2016,