DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Trend of Dispute on the Right to Be Forgotten and Acceptance Task of Internet Laws in Korea

잊혀질 권리의 논의 동향과 우리나라 인터넷 법제의 수용과제

  • Received : 2013.01.27
  • Accepted : 2013.03.05
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

Matters related to the right to be forgotten started the dispute Europe to introduce it first when Data Protection Directive established in 1995 proceeded revision. Relating to this, diverse disputes proceed on responding to personal information protection and internet laws in our nation. Especially as our National Assembly submitted the law regarding the promotion of information and communication network use and protection of information and amendment of copyright, it is necessary to look into the movement on introduction of law of right to be forgotten closely in detail. EU which attempted the institutionalization for the first time, relating to review of General Data Protection Regulation, proposed opinions such as the necessity to define subjects of personal information concretely and specifically and or protection target and balanced consideration on freedom of expression which is constitutional value. In the case of our nation, there was legislation attempt to introduce the regulation but it was limited in the form of fallen effectiveness without concrete and detailed review on internet law. To solve such problems, it is necessary to look into issues and matters to be considered required to accept right to be forgotten closely and discuss possibility of introducing right to be forgotten, conflicts between fundamental rights becoming issue, effect of goal achievement of personal information protection through the system introduction, and other rational acceptance method.

Keywords

References

  1. 권헌영, "새로운 개인정보보호법 시행 이후 현황분석과 개선방안", 2012 개인정보보호의 최근 동향 국제학술대회 자료집, 개인정보보호 법학회.개인정보보호위원회, (2012), p.28.
  2. 문재완, "프라이버시 보호를 목적으로 하는 인터넷의 규제의 의의와 한계", 언론과 법, 제10권, 제2호(2011), pp.26-29.
  3. '사이버 불링' 끈질긴 모욕 美서만 한달새 10代 7명 '자살', 문화일보, 2012.
  4. '정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률 일부개정법률안', 이노근 의원 대표발의, 의안번호(19대 03676), '저작권법 일부개정법률안', 이노근 의원 대표발의, 의안번호(19대03675).
  5. 정상기, "잊혀질 권리와 표현의 자유", 과학 기술법연구, 한남대학교 과학기술법연구원, 제18권, 제3호(2012), pp.207-231.
  6. 최진실 자살, 얼굴 숨긴 인격 살인 ... 인터넷 악플 이대론 안된다, 중앙일보, 2008.
  7. 헌재, 99헌마 513, 2005.
  8. 홍완식, "유럽연합의 입법에 관한 연구", 법제, 법제처, (2004), pp.16-17.
  9. "A comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union", EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Brussels, (2010), p.2.
  10. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, "Opinion 01/2012 on the data protection reform proposals", (2012), pp.13-14.
  11. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, "Opinion 08/2012 providing further input on the data protection reform discussions", (2012), p.22.
  12. http://www.cyberbullying.us/research.php.
  13. Jan Philipp Albrecht, "Draft Report on the Proposal for General Data Protection Regulation", Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, (2013), p.53, 98, 196.
  14. Norberto Nuno Gomes de Andrade, 'Oblivion: the right to be different. from oneself reproposing the right to be forgotten', Revista D'internt, Dret I Politica, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, (2012), pp.124-126.
  15. Proposal for a Regulation of the european parliament and of the council on the protection of individuals with to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data(General Data Protection Regulation), (2012), p.44, pp.92-93.
  16. Peter, D. M. and B. R. Tirtea, "The right to be forgotten-between expectation and practice", Enisa, (2011), p.13.