DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Generalized methods of moments in marginal models for longitudinal data with time-dependent covariates

  • Received : 2013.04.17
  • Accepted : 2013.05.18
  • Published : 2013.07.31

Abstract

The quadratic inference functions (QIF) method proposed by Qu et al. (2000) and the generalized method of moments (GMM) for marginal regression analysis of longitudinal data with time-dependent covariates proposed by Lai and Small (2007) both are the methods based on generalized method of moment (GMM) introduced by Hansen (1982) and both use generalized estimating equations (GEE). Lai and Small (2007) divided time-dependent covariates into three types such as: Type I, Type II and Type III. In this paper, we compared these methods in the case of Type II and Type III in which full covariates conditional mean assumption (FCCM) is violated and interested in whether they can improve the results of GEE with independence working correlation. We show that in the marginal regression model with Type II time-dependent covariates, GMM Type II of Lai and Small (2007) provides more ecient result than QIF and for the Type III time-dependent covariates, QIF with independence working correlation and GMM Type III methods provide the same results. Our simulation study showed the same results.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, G. Y. and Dashnyam, O. (2013). Quadratic inference functions in marginal models for longitudinal data with time-varying stochastic covariates. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 24, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.3.651
  2. Diggle, P. J. Heagerty, P. Liang, K-Y. and Zeger, S. L. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data, Oxford University Press, New York.
  3. Fitzmaurice, G. M. (1995). A caveat concerning independence estimating equations with multivariate binary data. Biometrics, 51, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533336
  4. Fitzmaurice, G. M, Liard, N. M. and Ware, J. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley, New York.
  5. Hansen, L. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized methods of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029-1055. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
  6. Lai, Tz. L. and Small, D. (2007). Marginal regression analysis of longitudinal data with time-dependent covariates: A generalized method of moments approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 69, 79-99.
  7. Pan, W., Thomas, A. L. and John, E. C. (2000). Note on marginal linear regression with correlated response data. The American Statistician, 54, 191-195.
  8. Pepe, M. S. and Anderson, G. L. (1994). A cautionary note on inference for marginal regression models with longitudinal data and general correlated response data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation, 23, 939-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919408813210
  9. Qu, A., Lindsay, B. G. and Li, B. (2000). Improving generalized estimating equations using quadratic inference functions. Biometrika, 87, 823-836. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.4.823
  10. Qu, A. and Lindsay, B. G. (2003). Building adaptive estimating equation when inverse of covariance estimation is difficult. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 65, 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00376
  11. Song, P. X.-K., Jiang, Z., Park, E. J. and Qu, A. (2009) Quadratic inference functions in marginal models for longitudinal data. Statistical Medicine, 28, 3683-3696. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3719

Cited by

  1. Upgraded quadratic inference functions for longitudinal data with type II time-dependent covariates vol.25, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2014.25.1.211
  2. Estimation of the joint conditional distribution for repeatedly measured bivariate cholesterol data using nonparametric copula vol.27, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.3.689