DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Difference between Excellent Teachers and General Teachers through Flanders' Language Interaction System

수업언어분석을 통한 우수교사와 일반교사의 수업형태 차이 연구 -Flanders의 언어상호작용 분석을 중심으로-

  • Received : 2013.03.18
  • Accepted : 2013.04.23
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to improve teacher's instruction to comparative, analytic method about the excellent teachers and general teachers of Korean subject through Flanders' Interaction System. The objects for analysis were field excellent instructions which were known as the best lectures from the instruction contest in Busan city, and the normal lectures by school curriculum which were video recorded and openly released on the web. This study was limited the use of same grade, subject and period. The analytic method used the software of AF(Advanced Flanders) based on the frame of Flanders' language Interaction System. Results showed as follows: (a) The excellent teachers used more interactions with the praise and encouragement than general teachers. (b) The excellent teachers induced students asked questions and answers with voluntary. These results could provide effective self-checking tools for enhance their instruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Byeon, Young-Gye, Kim, Kyung-Hyun(2007). Instructional Supervision and Instructional Analysis, Seoul : Hakjisa.
  2. Byeon, Young-Gye, Lee, Sang-Soo(2003). Instructional Design. Seoul : Hakjisa
  3. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior, Reading MA: Addison - Wesley.
  4. Flanders, N. (1976). Interaction analysis of clinical supervision, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 47-48.
  5. Gim, Chae-chun, Byeon, Hyo-Jong(2005). A critical Analysis of the Meaning of 'Good Instruction', Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, 17(3), 373-382.
  6. Han, Jang-Soo(1996). Analysis Verbal Interaction of Flanders, Education Research Information 25, 118-126.
  7. Heo, Gyun(2009). A Case Study on Analysis of Field Excellent Class through Flanders Interaction System, Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, 21(4), 499-507.
  8. Kim, Jeong-Won(1997). (A) participant - observational study on the patterns of classroom teaching in an elementary school, Doctor Degree, Seoul National University.
  9. Kim, Jong-Seo, Kim, Young-Chan(1970). Analysis of Instructional Form, Seoul : Baeyoungsa.
  10. Kim, Soo-Young(1980). A study about Teacher's Statements Form, Master Degree, Ewha Womans University.
  11. Lee, Myung-Shin(2003).An analysis of the kindergarten english class using the Flanders' category system, Master Degree. Yeonsei University.
  12. Yeo, Mi-Ran(2009).A comparative Analysis on the Current Instruction Styles of Kindergartens and Elementary School in Accordance with Flanders Interaction Analysis System, Master Degree, Pusan National University.
  13. Yoo, Shin-Young(2005). Teacher's Reflection on the Instructional Practice : Developing a Model to Support Reflective Teaching, Master Degree, Ewha Womans University.
  14. EASY Analysis Instruction Ver 3.2 beta(2009). http://www.edusugar.com