DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Prediction and Control of Wind-Induced Heel Motion of Cruise Ship

바람 하중에 의한 크루즈선의 횡경사 예측 및 제어에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Jae-Han (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yonghwan (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Soo (Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd.)
  • 김재한 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 김용환 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 김용수 (대우조선해양(주))
  • Received : 2012.10.09
  • Accepted : 2013.06.24
  • Published : 2013.08.20

Abstract

The present study considers the prediction of wind-induced heel of cruise ship and its stabilization. Wind load in ocean exerts on the surface of superstructure of cruise ship, which causes the heel moment on the ship. The calculation of wind load starts from choosing wind speed profile, so that the logarithmic wind profile model is applied in this study. Heel moment by wind load is calculated by adopting approximate formulation and applied to the ship motion analysis in time domain. Motion stabilizers, such as stabilizing fin and U-tube tank, are considered to reduce the heel effect as well as excessive roll motion. From this study, it is expected that the present method can be applied to the prediction and stabilization of the heel motion of cruise ships.

Keywords

References

  1. Abkowitz, M.A., 1959. The Effect of Anti-pitching Fins on Ship Motions. Transaction of SNAME, 67, pp.210-252.
  2. Allan, J.F., 1945. The Stabilization of Ships by Activated Fins. Transaction of RINA, 87, pp.123-159.
  3. Bhattacharyya, R., 1978. Dynamics of marine vehicles. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York.
  4. Blendermann, W., 1994. Parameter Identification of Wind Loads on Ships. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 51(3), pp.339-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90067-1
  5. DNV, 2010. Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads, Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C205, October 2010, Det Norske Veritas.
  6. Fujiwara, T. & Ueno, M., 2006. Cruising performance of a large passenger ship in heavy sea. 16th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, San Francisco, USA, 28 May-2 June 2006.
  7. Kim, J.H. & Kim, Y., 2010. Study on Linear Seakeeping Analysis, the Prediction of Added Resistance, and Motion Control Algorithm. Project report (in Korean), Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Kim, J.H. & Kim, Y., 2011. Motion Control of a Cruise Ship by using Active Stabilizing Fins. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 225(4), pp.311-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211421268
  9. Lloyd, A.R., 1989. Seakeeping: Ship Behavior in Rough Weather. Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Chichester.
  10. Marzouk, O.A. & Nayfeh, A.H., 2009. Control of Ship Roll using Passive and Active Anti-roll Tanks. Ocean Engineering, 36(9), pp.661-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.03.005
  11. Minorski, N., 1935. Problems of Anti-rolling Stabilization of Ships by the Activated Tank Method. Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers, 47(1), pp.87-119.
  12. Moaleji, R. & Greig, A.R., 2007. On the Development of Ship Anti-roll Tanks. Ocean Engineering, 34(1), pp.103-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.12.013
  13. Serra, A., 2002. Experimental Wind Tunnel Tests on Large Passenger Ships. Report of CETENA Research Plan 2002.
  14. Stigter, C., 1966. The Performance of U-tanks as a Passive Anti-rolling Device. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects ISP, 13(144), pp.249-275.
  15. Webster, W.C., 1967. Analysis of the Control of Activated Antiroll Tanks. Transaction of SNAME, 75, pp.296-331.

Cited by

  1. A Study of Real Ship Experiments to Estimate the Heeling Angle of Passenger Type Ship when Turning vol.24, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.5.497