Breast Reconstruction with Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap in Asian

동양인에서 위볼기동맥 천공지판을 이용한 유방재건

  • Jeong, Woo Shik (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Taek Jong (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Eom, Jin Sup (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 정우식 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이택종 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 엄진섭 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.03.21
  • Accepted : 2013.05.01
  • Published : 2013.05.30

Abstract

Purpose: Breast reconstruction with lower abdominal tissue can produce the best outcome with acceptable rates of long-term complication. However, for cases in which sufficient abdominal tissue is not available, an superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap can be considered as the next option for autologous breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Among a total of 63 women who underwent breast reconstruction with free autologous tissue transfer from July 2010 to April 2011, SGAP flap was performed for four patients. In two cases, patients did not have enough abdominal tissue for sizable breast reconstruction. In another case, the patient had a long abdominal scar due to donor hepatectomy of liver transplantation. In the last case, which was a revisional case after radiation necrosis of a previous pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, a large amount of healthy skin and soft tissue was needed. SGAP flap was elevated in lateral decubitus position. The internal mammary vessels were used for recipient vessels in all cases. Results: Breast reconstruction was performed successfully in all four cases without flap loss. Donor site complication was not observed, except for one case of seroma. The shape of the reconstructed breast was satisfactory in all patients. Conclusion: SGAP flap is an excellent alternative option for the TRAM or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. In terms of narrower width, harder consistency of soft tissue, and shorter pedicle, it is clear that the SGAP flap is less competent than the TRAM flap. However, in cases where abdominal tissue is not available, SGAP flap is the only way of providing a large amount of healthy tissue.

Keywords