DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The analysis of optical influence on the grading tolerances and proportions for the round brilliant cut polished diamonds

Round brilliant cut으로 연마한 diamond의 등급별 허용 오차와 proportions에 관한 광학적 영향력 분석

  • Kim, Eun-Ju (Dept. of the Faculty of Arts & Profession and Industrial Design, Dongshin University)
  • 김은주 (동신대학교 교양교직학부(& 산업디자인학과))
  • Received : 2013.07.11
  • Accepted : 2013.08.09
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

Even though a rough diamond shape is irregular and rugged, it is easy to be processed to make gem, shaped facets (table, crown, pavilion and girdle) were precisely treated because they influence on the evaluation of diamond grading. Those specifications suitable for the standard round brilliant cut diamond polishing were investigated and in 95 % statistical confidence interval, standard deviation, mean and acceptable tolerance were examined. According to these variables (size, angle, depth, and thickness) distribution, the frequency analysis of ratings and proportions were compared with each other. The correlation between each variables and the evidence of influence represented in proportion were determined by the regression analysis applying LSM (Least Square Method). In this research, it was recognized that table sizes of the diamond jewels and pavilion depth (in %) influence the rating decision and in particular, the depth of pavilion acting as the main factor of proportions, also plays an important role in optical phenomena.

다이아몬드는 원석의 형태가 불규칙하고 견고하더라도 보석으로 쉽게 가공될 수 있으며, 등급 평가에 영향력을 나타내는 테이블, 크라운, 퍼빌리언, 거들면을 정밀하게 측정하였다. Round Brilliant Cut Diamond의 표준 연마에 적합한 규격을 조사하였고, 통계적(95 %) 신뢰 구간으로 표준편차, 평균, 허용 오차를 검토하였다. 측정된 크기, 각도, 깊이, 두께의 변수들이 나타내는 분포에 따라, 커팅 등급의 빈도 분석과 프로포션을 비교하였다. 각 변수간의 상관관계와 프로포션에 나타난 영향력의 근거는 LSM(Least Square Method)을 적용한 회귀 분석으로 결정하였다. 본 논문에서, 다이아몬드의 테이블 크기와 퍼빌리언 깊이 퍼센트가 등급 결정에 많은 영향을 미치고, 특히, 퍼빌리언 깊이는 프로포션과 관련하는 주요 원인으로 광학 현상에도 작용함을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. N. Peters, "Rough Diamonds (A Practical Guide)", (Amer Inst of Diamond Cutting Inc, 1999) p. 10.
  2. L. Ludel, "How to Cut a Diamond" (Library Congress Cata, Nevada, 1985) p. 70.
  3. R. Newman, "Diamond Hand Book (A Practical Guide to Diamond Evaluation)", (International Jewelry Publications (Los Angeles), 2010) p. 49.
  4. B.W. Anderson and E.A. Jobbins, "Gem Testing" (Butterworths (London, Boston, Singapore, Sydney, Toronto, Wellington), 1990) p. 195.
  5. Scandinavian, diamond nomenclature committee, "Scandinavian diamond nomenclature and grading standards)", (Scan. Jewellers' Association, 1970) p. 15.
  6. A. Godoy, "Diamond Identification and Appraisal" (Editorial Melvin, 2009) p. 112.
  7. V. krishnan, "Probability and Random Process" (Wiley- Interscience (A John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Publication), 2006) p. 684.
  8. G. Smith, "Statistical Reasoning", (Allyn and Bacon, Inc. (Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto), 1985) p. 471.
  9. R.E. James, "Statistics, Data Analysis, and Decision Modeling", (Pearson Education, 2010) p. 224.