DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

pH and buffering capacity in some commercial fermented milks

일부 시판 유산균 발효유의 pH와 적정산도

  • Ko, Seok-Ju (Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Soog (Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Choong-Ho (Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hee (Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 고석주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실) ;
  • 정성숙 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실) ;
  • 최충호 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실) ;
  • 김경희 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.02.01
  • Accepted : 2013.08.20
  • Published : 2013.08.01

Abstract

Objectives : The aim of this study was to evaluate the pH and buffering capacity in some commercial fermented milks in Korea. Methods : The study was carried ouf from June to August, 2012. In 35 liquid type, 79 condense-stirred type and 71 condense-drink type fermented milks, available on the market, pH and buffering capacity were measured. Titration(with NaOH) was used to determine the buffering effect of each fermented milk. They were titrated with 1 M sodium hydroxide, added in 0.1 milliliters increments, until the pH reached about 5.5 and 7.0. Results : The average pH of tested fermented milks was $4.08{\pm}0.27$. The average pH values of fermented milks were $3.64{\pm}0.22$ in liquid type, $4.14{\pm}0.12$ in condense-stirred type, and $4.22{\pm}0.17$ condense-drink type. The average buffering capacity (pH 5.5) of tested fermented milk was $2.40{\pm}0.54$. The average buffering capacity (pH 5.5) of liquid type fermented milk was $2.37{\pm}0.33$, condense-stirred type fermented milk was $2.77{\pm}0.46$ and condense-drink type fermented milk was $2.01{\pm}0.42$. The average buffering capacity (pH 7.0) of tested fermented milks was $4.00{\pm}0.87$. The average buffering capacity (pH 7.0) of liquid type fermented milk was $3.11{\pm}0.36$, condense-stirred type fermented milk was $4.78{\pm}0.55$ and condense-drink type fermented milk was $3.58{\pm}0.59$. Conclusions : The average pH of tested fermented milks in this study was lower than pH 4.5. The type of fermented milks was an important factor for selection of fermented milk which is related with enamel erosion.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang TJ. Efficacy and use of lactic acid bacteria. Biowave 2009; 11(7): 1-20.
  2. Lee JL, Huh CS, Baek YJ. Utilization of Fermented Milk and It's Health Promotion. Koren Dairy Techno 1999; 17(1): 58-71.
  3. Twetman S, Stechsen-Blicks C. Probiotics and oral health effects in children. Int J Pediatr Dent 2008; 18(1): 3-10.
  4. Datta R, Tsai SP, Bonsignore P, Moon SH, Frank JR. Technological and ecnomic potential of poly(lactic acid) and lactic acis derivatives. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1995; 16(2-3): 221-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1995.tb00168.x
  5. Sim JH, Jeong TS, Kim S. A study on the enamel erosion by fermented milks. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2004; 31(4): 555-63.
  6. Kim MA, Jeong SS, Youn HJ, Park YN, Choi CH, Hong SJ. The erosive effect of some commercial yogurts including different calcium contents on enamel surface. J Korean Acad Oral Health 2011; 35(3): 266-72.
  7. Shin YH, Kim YJ. Study on the primary tooth enamel erosion caused by children beverage. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2009; 36(2): 227-35.
  8. Rytomma I, Meurman JH, Koskinen J, Laakso T, Gharazi L, Turunen R. In vitro erosion of bovine enamel caused by acidic drinks and other foodstuffs. Scand J Dent Res 1998; 96(4): 324-33.
  9. Larsen MJ, Nyvad B. Enamel erosion by some soft drinks and orange juices relative to their pH, buffering effect and contents of calcium phosphate. Caries Res 1999; 33(1): 81-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016499
  10. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Maguire A, Gordon PH, McCabe JF, Stephenson G. Comparison of erosion of dental enamel by four drinks using an intra-oral applicance. Caries Res 1998; 32(5): 337-43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016469
  11. Edwards M, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Gilmour WH Buffering capacities of soft drinks: the potential influence on dental erosion. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26(12): 923-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00494.x
  12. Xhonga FA, Valdmanis S. Geographic comparisons of the incidence of dental erosion: a two centre study. J Oral Rehabil 1983; 10(3): 269-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00121.x
  13. Eccles JD. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent update 1982;9(7): 373-81.
  14. Bratthall D, Hansel-Petersson G, Sundberg H. Reasons for the caries decline: what do the experts believe?. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104(4): 416-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00104.x
  15. Meurman JH, ten Cate JM. Pathogenesis and modifying factors of dental erosion. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104(2): 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00068.x
  16. Tahmassebi JF, Duggal MS. The effect of different methods of drinking on the pH of dental plaque in vivo. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997; 7(4): 249-54.
  17. Ferrazzano GF, Cantile T, Quarto M, Ingenito A, Chianese L, Addeo F. Protective effect of yogurt extract on dental enamel demineralization in vitro. Aust Dent J 2008; 53(4): 314-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00072.x
  18. Reussner GH, Coccodrilli G Jr, Thiessen R Jr. Effects of phosphates in acid-containing beverages on tooth erosion. J Dent Res 1975; 54(2): 365-70.
  19. Lussi A, Jaggi T, Scharer S. The influence different factors on in vitro enamel erosion. Caries Res 1993; 27(5): 387-93. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261569
  20. Zero D. Etiology of dental erosion - extrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 104(2): 162-77.

Cited by

  1. The effects of xylitol and sorbitol mouth rinse on caries activity vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2015.15.02.311
  2. Quality and Sensory Characteristics of Fermented Milk Adding Black Carrot Extracts Fermented with Aspergillus oryzae vol.30, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2015.30.3.370
  3. Quality Properties of Yogurt Added with Hot Water Concentrates from Allium hookeri Root vol.43, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.9.1415
  4. Evaluation of quality characteristics in commercial yogurt vol.25, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2018.25.2.195
  5. 발효유류의 HACCP 시스템 적용을 위한 미생물학적 위해 분석 vol.16, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2015.16.1.438
  6. 유산균 발효유 종류에 따른 치아부식 위험도 평가 vol.17, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2017.17.04.657
  7. 요양병원환자에게 적용한 김치유산균 함유 동치미즙의 구강간호효과: 클로르헥시딘 용액과의 비교 vol.47, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.4.540
  8. 혼합주의 종류에 따른 치아의 부식능 차이 평가 vol.21, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.1.739