Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Cooking End-point Temperature and Muscle Part on Sensory 'Hardness' and 'Chewiness' Assessed Using Scales Presented in ISO11036:1994

  • Sasaki, Keisuke (National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO)) ;
  • Motoyama, Michiyo (National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO)) ;
  • Narita, Takumi (National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO)) ;
  • Chikuni, Koichi (National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO))
  • Received : 2013.04.12
  • Accepted : 2013.06.19
  • Published : 2013.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Texture and 'tenderness' in particular, is an important sensory characteristic for consumers' satisfaction of beef. Objective and detailed sensory measurements of beef texture have been needed for the evaluation and management of beef quality. This study aimed to apply the sensory scales defined in ISO11036:1994 to evaluate the texture of beef. Longissimus and Semitendinosus muscles of three Holstein steers cooked to end-point temperatures of $60^{\circ}C$ and $72^{\circ}C$ were subjected to sensory analyses by a sensory panel with expertise regarding the ISO11036 scales. For the sensory analysis, standard scales of 'chewiness' (9-points) and 'hardness' (7-points) were presented to the sensory panel with reference materials defined in ISO11036. As a result, both 'chewiness' and 'hardness' assessed according to the ISO11036 scales increased by increasing the cooking end-point temperature, and were different between Longissimus and Semitendinosus muscles. The sensory results were in good agreement with instrumental texture measurements. However, both texture ratings in this study were in a narrower range than the full ISO scales. For beef texture, ISO11036 scales for 'chewiness' and 'hardness' are useful for basic studies, but some alterations are needed for practical evaluation of muscle foods.

Keywords

References

  1. Boleman, S. J., S. L. Boleman, R. K. Miller, J. F Taylor, H. R. Cross, T. L. Wheeler, M. Koomaraie, S D Shackelford, M. F. Miller, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, and J .W. Savell. 1997. Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1521-1524.
  2. Braghieri, A., N. Piazzolla, A. Carlucci, E. Monteleone, A. Girolami, and F. Napolitano. 2012. Development and validation of a quantitative frame of reference for meat sensory evaluation. Food Qual. Pref. 25:63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.007
  3. Caine, W. R., J. L. Aalhun, D. R. Best, M. E. R. Dugan, and L. E. Jeremiah. 2003. Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner-Bratzler shear forces with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks. Meat Sci. 64:333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00110-9
  4. Cross, H. R. 1986. Sensory characteristics of meat. Part 1. Sensory factors and evaluation. In: The Science of Meat and Meat Products, 3rd Ed. (Ed. J. F. Price and B. S. Schweigert). Food & Nutrition Press, Inc., Westport, Connecticut. pp. 307-327.
  5. Findlay, C. J., D. W. Stanley, and E. A. Gullett. 1986. Thermomechanical properties of beef muscle. Meat Sci. 16: 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90012-4
  6. Huffman, K. L., M. F. Miller, L. C. Hoover, C. K. Wu, H. C. Brittin, and C. B. Ramsey. 1996. Effect of beef tenderness on consumer satisfaction with steaks consumed in the home and restaurant. J. Anim. Sci. 74:91-97.
  7. International Organization for Standardization. 1994. ISO11036:1994 Sensory analysis - Methodology - Texture profile. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  8. Martens, E., E. Stabursvik, and M. Martens. 1982. Texture and colour changes in meat during cooking related to thermal denaturation of muscle proteins. J. Texture Stud. 13:291-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1982.tb00885.x
  9. Mathevon, E., L. Mioche, W. E. Brown, and J. Culioli. 1995. Texture analysis of beef cooked at various temperatures by mechanical measurements, sensory assessments and electromyography. J. Texture Stud. 26:175-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1995.tb00792.x
  10. Miller, M. F., M. A. Carr, C. B. Ramsey, K. L. Crockett, and L. C. Hoover. 2001. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 3062-3068.
  11. National Livestock Breeding Center. 2005. Guidelines for sensory evaluation of meat. Japan Meat Information Service Center, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
  12. Otremba, M. M., M. E. Dikeman, G. A. Milliken, S. L. Stroda, J. A. Unruh, and E. Chambers IV. 1999. Interrelationships among evaluations of beef longissimus and semitendinosus muscle tenderness by Warner-Brayzler Shear Force, a descriptive-texture profile sensory panel, and a descriptive attribute sensory panel. J. Anim. Sci. 77:865-873.
  13. Otremba, M. M., M. E. Dikeman, G. A. Milliken, S. L. Stroda, E. Chambers IV, and D. Chambers. 2000. Interrelationships between descriptive texture profile sensory panel and descriptive attribute sensory panel evaluations of beef Longissimus and Semitendinosus muscles. Meat Sci. 54:325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00099-6
  14. Palka, K. and H. Daun. 1999. Changes in texture, cooking losses, and myofibrillar structure of bovine M. semitendinosus during heating. Meat Sci. 51:237-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00119-3
  15. Polkinghorne, R. J., T. Nishimura, K. E. Neath, and R. Watson. 2011. Japanese consumer categorization of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology. Anim. Sci. J. 82:325-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00825.x
  16. Sasaki, K. and M. Mitsumoto. 2004. Questionnaire-based study on consumer requirements for beef quality in Japan. Anim. Sci. J. 75:369-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2004.00199.x
  17. Sasaki, K., M. Mitsumoto, and H. Aizaki. 2006. Classification of consumers' viewpoint for purchasing retail beef package. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 77:67-76 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.77.67
  18. Sasaki, K., M. Motoyama, J. Yasuda, T. Yamamoto, M. Oe, T. Narita, M. Imanari, S. Fujimura, and M. Mitsumoto. 2010. Beef texture characterization using internationally established texture vocabularies in ISO5492:1992: Differences among four different end-point temperatures in three muscles of Holstein steers. Meat Sci. 86:422-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.028
  19. Sasaki, K., M. Motoyama, and T. Narita. 2012. Increased intramuscular fat improves both 'chewiness' and 'hardness' as defined in ISO5492:1992 of beef Longissimus muscle of Holstein ${\times}$ Japanese Black F1 steers. Anim. Sci. J. 83:338-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00946.x
  20. Shackelford, S. D., T. L. Wheeler, and M. Koohmaraie. 1995. Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:3333-3340.
  21. Tornberg, E. 2005. Effects of heat on meat proteins - Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci. 70:493-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.021

Cited by

  1. Qualitative and Quantitative Comparisons of Texture Characteristics between Broiler and Jidori-niku, Japanese Indigenous Chicken Meat, Assessed by a Trained Panel vol.54, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0160066