DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The combination of a histogram-based clustering algorithm and support vector machine for the diagnosis of osteoporosis

  • Kavitha, Muthu Subash (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Asano, Akira (Graduate School of Engineering, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Taguchi, Akira (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Matsumoto Dental University) ;
  • Heo, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.07
  • 심사 : 2013.05.07
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30

초록

Purpose: To prevent low bone mineral density (BMD), that is, osteoporosis, in postmenopausal women, it is essential to diagnose osteoporosis more precisely. This study presented an automatic approach utilizing a histogram-based automatic clustering (HAC) algorithm with a support vector machine (SVM) to analyse dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) and thus improve diagnostic accuracy by identifying postmenopausal women with low BMD or osteoporosis. Materials and Methods: We integrated our newly-proposed histogram-based automatic clustering (HAC) algorithm with our previously-designed computer-aided diagnosis system. The extracted moment-based features (mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) of the mandibular cortical width for the radial basis function (RBF) SVM classifier were employed. We also compared the diagnostic efficacy of the SVM model with the back propagation (BP) neural network model. In this study, DPRs and BMD measurements of 100 postmenopausal women patients (aged >50 years), with no previous record of osteoporosis, were randomly selected for inclusion. Results: The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the BMD measurements using our HAC-SVM model to identify women with low BMD were 93.0% (88.0%-98.0%), 95.8% (91.9%-99.7%) and 86.6% (79.9%-93.3%), respectively, at the lumbar spine; and 89.0% (82.9%-95.1%), 96.0% (92.2%-99.8%) and 84.0% (76.8%-91.2%), respectively, at the femoral neck. Conclusion: Our experimental results predict that the proposed HAC-SVM model combination applied on DPRs could be useful to assist dentists in early diagnosis and help to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with low BMD and osteoporosis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consensus Statement 2000; 17: 1-45.
  2. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 897-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1627-0
  3. Horner K, Devlin H. The relationship between mandibular bone mineral density and panoramic radiographic measurements. J Dent 1998; 26: 337-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00020-1
  4. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kröger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102: 68-72.
  5. Hildebolt CF. Osteoporosis and oral bone loss. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26: 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600226
  6. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 628-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70097-1
  7. White SC, Taguchi A, Kao D, Wu S, Service SK, Yoon D, et al. Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 339-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1692-4
  8. Devlin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Jacobs R, Lindh C, van der Stelt P, et al. Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 821-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.12.027
  9. Arifin AZ, Asano A, Taguchi A, Nakamoto T, Ohtsuka M, Tsuda M, et al. Computer-aided system for measuring the mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs in identifying postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 753-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0045-2
  10. Devlin H, Allen PD, Graham J, Jacobs R, Karayianni K, Lindh C, et al. Automated osteoporosis risk assessment by dentists: a new pathway to diagnosis. Bone 2007; 40: 835-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.024
  11. Allen PD, Graham J, Farnell DJ, Harrison EJ, Jacobs R, Nicopolou- Karayianni K, et al. Detecting reduced bone mineral density from dental radiographs using statistical shape models. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2007; 11: 601-10.
  12. Roberts M, Yuan J, Graham J, Jacobs R, Devlin H. Changes in mandibular cortical width measurements with age in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 1915-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1410-3
  13. Kavitha MS, Samopa F, Asano A, Taguchi A, Sanada M. Computer- aided measurement of mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs for identifying osteoporosis. J Investig Clin Dent 2012; 3: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00095.x
  14. Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Fujita M, Tanimoto K, et al. Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners' diagnostic performance. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 659-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1419-y
  15. Lee K, Taguchi A, Ishii K, Suei Y, Fujita M, Nakamoto T, et al. Visual assessment of the mandibular cortex on panoramic radiographs to identify postmenopausal women with low bone mineral densities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 226-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.052
  16. Taguchi A, Asano A, Ohtsuka M, Nakamoto T, Suei Y, Tsuda M, et al. Observer performance in diagnosing osteoporosis by dental panoramic radiographs: results from the osteoporosis screening project in dentistry (OSPD). Bone 2008; 43: 209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.014
  17. World Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal women osteoporosis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994.
  18. Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N, Naito K, Suzuki G, Fukunaga M. Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 1547-53. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.8.1547
  19. Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 2001; 19: 331-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007740170001
  20. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. Englewood Cliffs: Addison-Wesley Pub; 1992.
  21. Ketchen DJ, Shook CL. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strat Mgmt J 1996; 17: 441-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G
  22. Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schutze H. Introduction to information retrieval. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  23. Hartigan JA. Clustering algorithms: probability & mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley; 1975.
  24. Wee LJ, Tan TW, Ranganathan S. SVM-based prediction of caspase substrate cleavage sites. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7 Suppl 5: S14.
  25. Burges CJ. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 1998; 2: 121-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009715923555
  26. Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer; 1995.
  27. Vapnik VN. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley; 1998.
  28. Ciesielski K, Sacha JP, Cios K. Synthesis of feedforward networks in supremum error bound. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2000; 11: 1213-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.883398
  29. Back AD, Chen T. Universal approximation of multiple nonlinear operators by neural networks. Neural Comput 2002; 14: 2561-6. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976602760407964
  30. Aleksander I, Morton H. An introduction to neural computing. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990.
  31. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with kernels. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.
  32. Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1999.
  33. Karayianni K, Horner K, Mitsea A, Berkas L, Mastoris M, Jacobs R, et al. Accuracy in osteoporosis diagnosis of a combination of mandibular cortical width measurement on dental panoramic radiographs and a clinical risk index (OSIRIS): the OSTEODENT project. Bone 2007; 40: 223-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.07.025
  34. Tuceryan M, Jain AK. Texture analysis. In: Chen CH, Pau LF, Wang PS. The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.; 1998. p. 207-48.
  35. Kavitha MS, Asano A, Taguchi A, Kurita T, Sanada M. Diagnosis of osteoporosis from dental panoramic radiographs using the support vector machine method in a computer-aided system. BMC Med Imaging 2012; 12: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-12-1
  36. Muramatsu C, Matsumoto T, Hayashi T, Hara T, Katsumata A, Zhou X, et al. Automated measurement of mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (in press).
  37. Yosue T, Brooks SL. The appearance of the mental foramina on panoramic and periapical radiographs. II. Experimental evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 488-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90151-5

피인용 문헌

  1. Panoramic Measures for Oral Bone Mass in Detecting Osteoporosis : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.94, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514554949
  2. Quantitative assessment of mandibular cortical erosion on dental panoramic radiographs for screening osteoporosis vol.11, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1438-8
  3. Automatic detection of osteoporosis based on hybrid genetic swarm fuzzy classifier approaches vol.45, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160076
  4. Artificial intelligence on the identification of risk groups for osteoporosis, a general review vol.17, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0436-1
  5. Osteoporosis Recognition in Rats under Low-Power Lens Based on Convexity Optimization Feature Fusion vol.9, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47281-7
  6. Osteoporosis detection in panoramic radiographs using a deep convolutional neural network-based computer-assisted diagnosis system: a preliminary study vol.48, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170344
  7. The use and performance of artificial intelligence applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A systematic review vol.49, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190107
  8. Computer-aided diagnosis systems for osteoporosis detection: a comprehensive survey vol.58, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02171-3
  9. Current applications and development of artificial intelligence for digital dental radiography vol.51, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210197