DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Morphology and Electrical Properties of Back Electrode for Solar Cell Depending on the Mo : Na/Mo Bilayer Thickness

Mo : Na/Mo 이중층 구조 두께에 따른 태양전지 후면전극의 조직 및 전기적 특성

  • Shin, Younhak (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Myunghan (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
  • 신윤학 (충북대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 김명한 (충북대학교 신소재공학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.05
  • Accepted : 2013.08.27
  • Published : 2013.09.27

Abstract

Mo-based thin films are frequently used as back electrode materials because of their low resistivity and high crystallinity in CIGS chalcopyrite solar cells. Mo:Na/Mo bilayer thin films with $1{\mu}m$ thickness were deposited on soda lime glass by varying the thickness of each layer using dc-magnetron sputtering. The effects of the Mo:Na layer on morphology and electrical property in terms of resistivity were systematically investigated. The resistivity increased from $159{\mu}{\Omega}cm$ to $944{\mu}{\Omega}cm$; this seemed to be caused by increased surface defects and low crystallinity as the thickness of Mo:Na layer increased from 100 nm to 500 nm. The surface morphologies of the Mo thin films changed from a somewhat coarse fibrous structures to irregular and fine celled structures with increased surface cracks along the cell boundaries as the thickness of Mo:Na layer increased. Na contents varied drastically from 0.03 % to 0.52 % according to the variation of Mo:Na layer thickness. The change in Na content may be ascribed to changes in surface morphology and crystallinity of the thin films.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Bouabid, A. Ihlal, A Manar, A. Outzourhit and E. L. Ameziane, Thin Solid Films, 488, 62 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.04.111
  2. K. W. Mitchell, C. Eberspacher, J. Ermer and D. Pier, Proc. 20th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., 1384, (1989).
  3. A. M. Gabor, J. R. Tuttle, M. A. Contreras, D. S Albin, A. Franz, D. W. Niles, and R. Noufi, 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf., 1, (1994).
  4. W. K. Batchelor, I. L. Repins, J. Schaefer, M. E. Beck, Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cell., 83, 67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2003.10.005
  5. J. H. Scofield, A. Duba, D. Albin, B. L. Ballard, P. K. Predecki, Thin Solid Films, 260, 26 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)06462-8
  6. R. J. Matson, J.E. Granata, S.E. Asher and M. R. Young, NREL, 25682, 6 (1998).
  7. L. Assmann, J. C. Bernede, A. Drici, C. Amory, E. Halgand and M. Morsli, Appl. Surf. Sci., 246, 159 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.020
  8. Y. C. Lin, Y. Y. Tu and C. H. Shen, Mateials Science, 24. 514 (2013).