DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestion of Using Defense Quality Score based on Taguchi Loss Function in Korea Defense Area

다구찌 손실함수 개념을 응용한 국방품질스코어 적용 가능성에 대한 연구 : 군수품 사례 위주

  • Ahn, Namsu (Daejeon Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Park, Sangwon (Daejeon Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Chae, Jongmok (Daejeon Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Lee, Youngwoo (Daejeon Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Oh, Byeongin (Daejeon Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 안남수 (국방기술품질원 대전센터) ;
  • 박상원 (국방기술품질원 대전센터) ;
  • 채종목 (국방기술품질원 대전센터) ;
  • 이영우 (국방기술품질원 대전센터) ;
  • 오병인 (국방기술품질원 대전센터)
  • Received : 2013.07.26
  • Accepted : 2013.08.19
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, many quality issues are aroused in military forces, such as failures in K-series weapons, combat boots defects and 40mm ammunition explosion accident. To address these problems, this paper suggests to use so called, Defense Quality Score, which is based on Taguchi loss function and developed in this research. Methods: Current defense specification states only the minimum requirement to produce the military supplies. Therefore, it is not easy to indue the continuous quality improvement of the supplies. This research suggests to use the defense quality score which measures the current status of defense supplies'quality characteristics. Results: We applied the defense quality score concept into the hot pepper sauce and long time stockpiled ammunition. We first categorize the quality characteristics into three categories, then assign the certain amount of score based on the importance of the characteristics. Lastly, we applied the modified Taguchi loss function to calculate the achieved score of the characteristics. The perfect score is 100 and the closer to the score, the better product it indicates. Conclusions: In this research, we developed the modified Taguchi loss function to apply into the korean defense supplies. The loss function is utilized to calculate the achieved level of satisfaction of the supplies based on the defense specifications. The application of defense quality score may help to stimulate the continuous quality improvement and encourage the good will quality competition among the military providers.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, Namsu, Jung, Jisun, Park, Sangwon, Jung, Woonkwon., and Hwang, Wooyeol. 2012. "Sampling Procedure Enhancement in Government Defense Quality Assurace Procedures." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40(3):245-258. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.245
  2. American National Standards Institute(ANSI). 1979. Quality Systems Terminology (ANSI Z1.7).
  3. Defense Acquisition Program Administration. 2011. A Guideline of Template and Writing of Defense Specification (2011-31).
  4. Choi, Jaeseung, Wu, Soon, Choi, Gyuchang, and Lee, Joowook. 2012. The Strength and Weakness in Korea Defense Supplies. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality.
  5. Defense Acquisition Program Administration(DAPA). 2010. Purchase Requirement of Sauce (red pepper paste, soybean paste, soy sauce, and etc.) (8950-7011).
  6. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ). 2012. Requirement of Defense Quality Management Task (Policy and Planning-460).
  7. Department of Defense(DoD) Reliability Analysis Center(RAC). 2010. "Analysis of One-Shot Devices." 7(4):1-4.
  8. East Sea Food. 2013. "Red Hot Pepper Taste." Last modified, July 12. http://www.dhfood.com.
  9. Head Quarter of Purchase in Department of Defense. 2004. Inspection Standards of food. Department of Defense(DoD).
  10. Huh, Youngtaek. 2011. "The Reliability Assessment of Conventional Ammunition by Items." Defense Agency for Technology and Quality.
  11. Japan Industrial Standards(JSI). 1979. Quality Systems Terminology (JIS Z8101).
  12. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards(KATS). 2003. Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards - Part 1 : Guidelines for Selection and Use (KS A 9000-1).
  13. Kim, Yeonsung, Park, Youngtaek, Seo, Youngho, Yoo, Wangjin, and Yoo, Hanju. 2002. Quality Management. Parkyoungsa.
  14. Kwon, Semin, Choi, Seokku, Cho, Gyeong, Baek, Seungho, and Kim, Yongsep. 2012. "A study on Development of Quality Satisfaction Index Model for Military Goods." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40(3):234-244. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.234
  15. Ree, Sangbok. 1997. "Analysis of Quality Loss Function(QLF) of Taguchi." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 25(3):119-130.