DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Directions of Regional Planning for Village Renewal in Korea

마을 재개발을 위한 지역계획수립 방향에 관한 연구

  • 임상봉 (한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원)
  • Received : 2013.09.12
  • Accepted : 2013.09.27
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

이 연구의 목적은 지자체의 계획수립 정책과 마을주민의 요구를 분석하여 농촌마을 재개발을 위한 지역계획 방향을 제시하는 데 있다. 마을재개발 주요 내용으로는 생활편의성 향상 뿐만 아니라 자연환경, 역사문화와 같은 어메니티 자원과 경관자원 등의 보전과 활용이 포함되어야 한다는 관점을 취하였다. 마을주민에 대한 설문조사와 마을재개발 계획수립 과정 및 결과에 분석을 토대로, 농촌마을재개발 계획의 특징을 파악한 후, 향후 발전을 위한 과제를 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 첫째, 마을재개발시 국토이용계획과 농촌특성을 반영할 수 있도록 토지이용 및 농촌개발 관련법을 보완해야 한다. 둘째, 농촌지역에 주거 및 취락지구를 도입하여 체계적인 마을정비가 이루어질 수 있도록 유도해 나갈 필요가 있다. 셋째, 지역계획수립 체계를 토지이용계획과 마을재개발 추진에 적합한 형태로 확립, 운영토록 한다. 넷째, 마을개발 부지 확보를 원활하게 할 수 있는 방향으로 농지교환분합 제도를 활성화해 나가도록 한다. 다섯째, 지역계획과 마을재개발이 유기적으로 연계되어 추진될 수 있도록 우선 개발 마을을 선정하고, 마을주민의 요구를 반영한 마을발전계획을 수립하며, 농촌취락지구와 같은 농촌토지 용도지구를 도입, 운영할 필요가 있다. 여섯째, 마을재개발 시범사업의 추진 및 평가를 토대로 체계적인 본 사업을 확대, 시행해 나가는 방안 마련이 필요하다. 일곱째, 농촌지역의 낙후도를 고려한 사업지원 및 추진에 차등화 방안을 마련할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Altes, W.K.K., 2008, Evaluating national urban planning: is Dutch planning a success or failure? in New Principles in Planning Evaluation, Urban Planning and Environment, edited by Abdul, K., Hull, A., Miller, D. and Woltjer, J. Aldershot: Ashgate, 221-238.
  2. Anton, P.A. The Economic Value of Open Space - Implications for Land Use Decisions: Implications for Land Use Decisions, Available at: http://www.embraceopenspace.org/vertical/Sites/%7B82D BC2D2-DFA6-4A33-879D-A8D2AF1A5804%7D/upload s/%7B3A54EEAC-BD55-4A8F-B49F-EC58D5CD328F% 7D.PDF [accessed: 3 September 2008].
  3. Bavarian State Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, 2003, Landscape Management: Village Renewal, Land Consolidation, Land Development Regional, Bavarian State Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry.
  4. Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk, 1998, King's Lynn & West Norfolk Local Plan: A Summary Guide, Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk.
  5. Choi, W., 2004, Farmland Consolidation in Korea, Paper to the Symposium on Modern Land Consolidation, Volvic, France, 10-11 September 2004.
  6. Choi, Y.K., 2004, Linking planning system between spatial development plan and environment plan toward sustainable development, Ecological Issues in a Changing World - Status, Response and Strategy, edited by Hong, S.K. et al. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands, 263-299.
  7. Dammers, E. and Keiner, M., 2006, Rural development in Europe: trends, challenges and prospects for the future, disP, 166(3), 5-15.
  8. Doitchinova, J., 2005, Multifunctional agriculture as opportunity for rural development, Trakin Journal of Sciences, 3 (7), 41-43.
  9. Dunford, M., 2008, Regional Development Models, Available at: http://www.geog.susx.ac.uk/research/eggd/ege/pdf/models rd.pdf [accessed: 1 September 2008].
  10. FAO, 2008, Opportunities to Mainstream Land Consolidation in Rural Development Programmes of the European Union, Rome: FAO.
  11. FIG et al., The Munich Statement on land consolidation as a tool for rural development in CEE/CIS countries, Available at: http://www.landentwicklung-muenchen.de/cd_ceec_confe rence/3_results_of_the_conference/3_munich_statement /munich_statment_logos.pdf [accessed: 8 September 2008].
  12. Gur, M., Cagdas, V. and Demirei, Z., 2003, Land Consolidation As a Tool of Rural Sustainable Development, Paper to the 2nd FIG Regional Conference, Marrakech, Morocco, December 2-5, 2003.
  13. Heins, S., 2004, Rural living in the city and countryside: demand and supply in the Netherlands, Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 17(4), 391-408.
  14. Hite, J., 1999, The Thunen Model As a Paradigm for Rural Development, Available at: http://www.strom.clemson.edu/opinion/hite/thunen.html [accessed: 13 September 2008].
  15. Hong, S.K., Song, I.S., Byun, B., Yoo, S. and Nakagoshi, N., 2005, Applications of biotope mapping for spatial environmental planning and policy: case studies in urban ecosystems in Korea, Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 1(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-005-0026-9
  16. Hrebiniak, L.G. and Joyce, W.F., 1985, Organizational adaptation: strategic choice and environmental determinism", Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 336-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392666
  17. Hwang, H.C., 1999, Rural Land Use Planning, Anseng: Anseong University Press.
  18. Im, S.B. et al., 2008, A Study on the Masterplan of Rural Village Redevelopment in Gyeongbuk Korea, Gyeongbuk Province, Uiwang: Korea Rural Community Corporation.
  19. Jervell, A.M. and Jolly, D.A., 2003, Beyond Food: Towards a Multifunctional Agriculture, Oslo: Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
  20. Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M. and Leiserowitz, A.A., 2005, What is sustainable development? goals, indicators, values, and practice, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47 (3), 8-21.
  21. Magel, H., 2003, LandPolicy and Land Management in Germany, Available at: http://www.landentwicklung-muenchen.de/mitarbeit/mage l/aufsaetze_vortraege_2003/uni_melb-06022003.pdf [accessed: 7 October 2008].
  22. Magel, H., 2008, Village Renewal in Germany: Objectives, Measures, Success, Available at: http://www.landentwicklung-muenchen.de/mitarbeit/mage l/aufsaetze_englisch/village.htm[accessed: 5 October 2008].
  23. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transportation, 2012, Annual Report on National Land Use.
  24. Morimoto, Y., 2004, Ecological dynamics of urban-rural landscapes - the need for landscape planning that considers the biodiversity in Japan", Ecological Issues in a Changing World - Status, Response and Strategy, edited by Hong, S.K. et al. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands, 325-336.
  25. Nemes, G., 2005, Integrated Rural Development: The Concept and Its Operation, Budapest: Institute of Economics Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  26. OECD, 1999, Cultivating Rural Amenities, Paris: OECD.
  27. Ohm, B.W., 2001, Required Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan, Wisconsin: Board of Regents of the Universityof Wisconsin System.
  28. Pal, A., 2008, Planning from the Bottom Up: Democratic Decentralisation in Action, Delft: Delft University of Technology.
  29. Reinke, M., 2005, Urban planning and SEA, Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment, edited by Schmidt, M., 571-584.
  30. Roberts, S., 2002, Key Drivers of Economic Development and Inclusion in Rural Areas: Initial scoping study of the socio-economic evidence base for DEFRA, Report researched and produced for DEFRA.
  31. Scholles, F. and Haaren, C. von, 2005, Co-ordination of SEA and landscape planning, Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment, edited by Schmidt, M.., 557-570.
  32. Studsholt, A., 2000, Experience of strategic environmental assessment in regional land use planning in North Jutland County in Denmark, Regional Development Programmes and Integration of Environmental Issues: the Role of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Workshop Proceedings, edited by Hilding, T., 43-45.
  33. Terluin, I., Roza, P., Berkhout, P., Godeschalk, F.and Betgen, M., 2006, Comparative Analyisis of EU Rural Development Policy in Central and Eastern European Countries and the Netherlands, The Hague: The Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI).
  34. U.S. Interagency Working Group on Sustainable Development Indicators Washington D.C., 2001, Sustainable Development in the United States: A Experimental Set of Indicators, Available at: http://www.sdi.gov/lpBin22/lpext.dll/Folder2/Infobase/1?f n=main-j.htm&f=templates&2.0 [accessed: 9 November 2008].
  35. Van den Brink, A. and Molema, M., 2008, The origins of Dutch rural planning: a study of the early history of land consolidation in the Netherlands, Planning Perspectives,23 (October),427-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430802319005
  36. Van Rij, E. and Altes, W.K.K., 2008, The merits of outmoded planning instruments for improving metropolitan green areas: the midden-delfland approach, Planning Theory & Practice, 9(3), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802277829
  37. Waterhout, B., 2008, The Institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning, Delft: Delft University of Technology.
  38. WWF, LUPG and SNM, 2005, Rural Development Environmental Programming Guidelines: A Manual Based on the Findings of the Europe's Living Countryside (ELCo) project, WWF, LUPG and SNM.