DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Methodology for Benefit Evaluation according to Maintenance Method and Timing of National Highway Pavement Section

국도포장 유지보수 공법 및 시기에 따른 편익산정 방안

  • Received : 2013.09.04
  • Accepted : 2013.10.01
  • Published : 2013.10.15

Abstract

PURPOSES : This study aims at proposing the methodology for benefit evaluations in pavement maintenance methods and timings using KoPMS(Korean Pavement Management System) software which was developed for efficient pavement management. METHODS : This study classified pavement sections into 4 clusters considering AADT(Annual Average Daily Traffic) and ESAL(Equivalent Single-Axle Load) using cluster analysis and used the deterioration models in each cluster. Increased user costs due to pavement deterioration as time goes by and agent costs for maintenance were estimated. Based on deterioration model and KoPMS software, Methodology for benefit evaluation was proposed in pavement maintenance methods and with/without implementation using real pavement section data. RESULTS : This study verified that considering agent costs only would be constrained to decide pavement maintenance methods and timings, and ascertained that decision making with agent and user costs would be effective. In addition, this study revealed that pavement maintenance methods and timings can be affected by AADT and ESAL and frequent pavement maintenances can be more efficient for benefits in pavement sections with more AADT and ESAL. Also this study found that user costs would be more affected to decision making than agent costs. Moreover, Delay of conducting pavement maintenance caused increased vehicle operating costs and environmental costs because of poor conditions of pavements. CONCLUSIONS : This study proposed LCCA and benefit estimation methodology of pavement with considering agent and user costs. The results of this study can be used for baseline data of efficient pavement asset management.

Keywords

References

  1. Christopher, R.B., and Greenwood, I.D., (2000) "Modelling Road User and Environmental Effects in HDM-4", HTC Infrastructure Management Ltd.
  2. Han, D., Do, M., Kim, S. and Kim, J. (2007) "Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavement Maintenance Standard considering User and Socio-environmental Cost"Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.27, No.6D, pp.727-740.
  3. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2013), "A Study on Development of Decision-making System", Final Report No. 2012-067.
  4. Kwon, S., Jung, K. and Seo, Y. (2002) "A Study on Decision Criteria of Traffic Volumes for Choosing of Modified Asphalt Pavement in Korea National Highway"Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.14, No.3, pp.25-33.
  5. Lee, Y., Do, M. and Lee, J. (2007) Development of pavementmanagement system for highway maintenance, Journal of theKorean Society of Road Engineers, Vol.9, No.4, pp.159-169.
  6. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM). (2011) "Guide of Investment Evaluation of Transportation Facilities - 4th Revision-", MLTM..
  7. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(MOLIT). (2013), Annual Research report of the national highway pavement management system 2012.
  8. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, (2004) Public benefits of highway system preservation and maintenance: A synthesis of highway practice, TRB.
  9. Peshkin, D.G., Hoerner, T.E. and Zimmerman, K.A.. (2004) Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications, NCHRP Report 523, TRB.

Cited by

  1. Pavement Maintenance System Through using the Permutation Algorithm vol.16, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2014.16.5.067