KIEAE Journal

Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (한국생태환경건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Daylighting Performance of a Classroom with Traditional and Louver type Shading Devices

교실에서의 일반형과 루버형 차양장치의 채광성능 비교 분석

  • Received : 2013.06.03
  • Accepted : 2013.08.26
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Shading devices have become an integral part of the daylighting strategy for sustainable classroom design. The louver type is newly designed shading devices which provide more view to the outside and protect from outside condition such as snow or rain. The purpose of this study is to compare the daylight performance of traditional and louver type overhang and lightshelf. The room dimension was $7.5m{\times}9.0m{\times}3.0m$. The length of shading devices was calculated by Palmero's study. The length of the traditional and louver type overhang was 455mm, 1210mm and lightshelf was 350/810mm, 625/555mm respectively. For the study, the Radiance 2.0 was used to evaluate the illuminance and uniformity ratios. And scale model were used to evaluate sunpatch area on the floor in model was calculated. The results showed that the louver type lightshelf was suitable for spring and summer, and louver type overhang was suitable for winter.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Y. Lee, K. D. Song, Prediction of Indoor Visual Environment and Lighting Energy of an Anidolic Light-duct System in Classrooms, Journal of the Society of Air-conditioning and refrigerating engineers of Korea, 2011, pp.377-380.
  2. J. H. Lim, J. J. Jung, J. Y. Lee, A Study on the Characteristics of Daylighting Environment in Classroom of an School Building Due to the External Shading Devices, Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 15(2), 2008, pp.4-15.
  3. D. S. Kim, J. H. Yoon, W. C. Shin, G. H. Lee, Prediction of Indoor Visual Environment and Lighting Energy of an Anidolic Light-duct System in Classrooms, Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 31(4), 2011, pp.136-141. https://doi.org/10.7836/kses.2011.31.4.136
  4. Architectural Institute of Japan, Daylighting Design (Kimoondang), J. T. Kim, G. Kim, W. W. Kim, 2009, pp.84-85.
  5. H. Y. Shin, J. T. Kim, Light Factor Performance of a Room with Light Guide and Blind Systems by Mockup Experiments, Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment, 7(1), 2007, pp. 23-31.
  6. Carlos E. O., Isaac G. C., Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting, Building and Environment, 41(1), 2006, pp.1128-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.001
  7. I. S. Cho, B. S. Kim, J. S. Lee, Analysis on the Indoor Daylight Performance and Optimum Size Selection of a Light Shelf Using Lightscape, Architectural Institute of Korea, 20(6), 2004, pp.231-238.
  8. Ana I. Palmero-Marrero, Armando C. Oliveira, Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements, Applied Energy 87, 2010, pp.2040-2049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.020
  9. W. S. Shin, K. Y. Han, A Study on the Optimum Size of the Classroom in Elementary and Middle-High School, Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 10(6), 2003, pp.27-37.
  10. Korea Institute of Educational Environment, Architectural Planning of School, 2009, pp.117.

Cited by

  1. Implementation and the Energy Efficiency of the Kinetic Shading System vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.5.067