The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The study on success rate of single implant replacing the mandibular first and second molars

하악 제1, 2대구치 단일 임플란트의 생존율에 관한 연구

  • Jung, Taek-Gyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Paeng, Joon-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
  • 정택균 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 팽준영 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 조진현 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이상한 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.07.30
  • Accepted : 2013.10.01
  • Published : 2013.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: After the introduction of concept of osteointegration, dental implantology have been successful procedure in the dental field. Recently, it has shown successful results when used to restore single tooth missing. Considering the difference in bone quality of the mandible and maxilla, and the increased occlusal force in the posterior region, the success rates in each region may be different. In this study, success rates of single implants placed in the mandibular first and second molar areas were analyzed. Materials and methods: The subjects were patients (284 patients, 308 implants) who had been operated with single implant installation from 2002 to 2009 in seven dental clinics in Daegu city. One hundred sixty eight implants were placed in the mandibular 1st molar and 140 implants were placed in the mandibular 2nd molar. They were analyzed according to implant site, age, sex, length and diameter. Results: The survival rates of single implant of this study were 97.6% in the mandibular 1st molar and 92.9% in the mandibular 2nd molar. In the mandibular 1st molar, 4 implants were failed. In the mandibular, 2nd molar, 10 implants were failed. Conclusion: The restoration of the mandibular 1st molar using single implant was found to be clinically acceptable treatment and showed higher survival rate than mandibular 2nd molar single implant. Single implant in mandibular 2nd molar needs careful consideration of poor bone quality, risk of overloading and anatomical structure of the mandible.

연구 목적: 치과 임플란트가 소개된 이후로 단일 치아 상실에 따른 임플란트 수복에 관한 성공적인 연구 결과들이 보고되고 임상적으로도 널리 사용되고 있다. 구강내의 다양한 부위에 따른 연구들이 있어 왔으나, 교합력이 강한 구치부 특히 하악 구치부에서 단일 임플란트에 관한 연구가 필요할 것이다. 본 연구는 하악의 제1대구치와 제2대 구치 부위에 식립된 단일 임플란트의 생존율에 관해 연구, 분석하였다. 연구 대상 및 방법: 2002년부터 2009년까지 대구광역시 소재의 7개 치과의원에서, 하악 제1, 2대구치에 단일 임플란트 치료를 받은 환자 284명에게 식립된 308개의 임플란트를 대상으로 하였다. 하악 제1대구치에 168개의 임플란트가 식립되었고, 하악 제2대구치에 140개의 임플란트가 식립되었다. 이들 임플란트는 식립위치, 환자의 성별, 연령, 임플란트의 직경 및 길이에 따라 분석하였다. 결과:하악 제1대구치에서는 4개의 임플란트가, 하악 제2대구치에서는 10개의 임플란트가 실패하였다. 하악 제1대구치에서는 97.6%, 하악 제2대구치에서는 92.9%의 성공률을 나타내었다. 환자의 연령, 성별, 식립방법, 임플란트의 직경 등에 따른 차이는 관찰할 수 없었다. 결론: 하악 제1대구치 단일 임플란트의 생존율은 하악 제2대구치 단일 임플란트의 생존율보다 높게 나타났다. 이는 하악 제2대구치 부위의 골질이 좋지 않고, 하악의 해부학적인 구조로 인해 하악 제2대구치 부위에 과도한 교합력이 가해질 우려가 있기 때문이라 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Longterm follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59.
  3. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:211-7.
  4. Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:51-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80229-X
  5. Cordioli G, Castagna S, Consolati E. Single-tooth implant rehabilitation: a retrospective study of 67 implants. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:525-31.
  6. Gunne J, Jemt T, Linde′n B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: a report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:143-8.
  7. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Branemark single tooth implants: a preliminary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:274-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80205-7
  8. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36.
  9. Sharifi MN, Pang IC, Chai J. Alternative restorative techniques of the CeraOne single-tooth abutment: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:235-8.
  10. Sullivan DY. Wide implants for wide teeth. Dent Econ 1994;84:82-3.
  11. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-34.
  12. Schwartz-Arad D, Samet N, Samet N. Single tooth replacement of missing molars: a retrospective study of 78 implants. J Periodontol 1999;70:449-54. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.4.449
  13. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
  14. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70048-4
  15. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. In proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontalogy. Berlin; Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1999, p. 242-54.
  16. Yurkstas AA. The effect of missing teeth on masticatory performance and efficiency. J Prosthet Dent 1954;4:120-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(54)90076-1
  17. Rosenberg ES, Cho SC, Elian N, Jalbout ZN, Froum S, Evian CI. A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:873-9.
  18. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. Mosby, 1999, p. 21-32.
  19. Balshi TJ, Hernandez RE, Pryszlak MC, Rangert B. A comparative study of one implant versus two replacing a single molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:372-8.
  20. Schwartz-Arad D, Samet N, Samet N. Single tooth replacement of missing molars: a retrospective study of 78 implants. J Periodontol 1999;70:449-54. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.4.449
  21. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:831-6.
  22. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Two-implant-supported single molar replacement: interdental space requirements and comparison to alternative options. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:426-35.
  23. Wheeler RC. A textbook of dental anatomy and physiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders Co.; 1950, p. 215-43.
  24. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:80-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090203.x
  25. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implantsupported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:19-31.
  26. Youssef RE, Throckmorton GS, Ellis E 3rd, Sinn DP. Comparison of habitual masticatory patterns in men and women using a custom computer program. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70123-9
  27. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, Ellner S, Chaffee N, Molina AL, Moriarty JD, Paquette D, Palmqvist U. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:182-92.
  28. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Petersson A. Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:422-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080509.x
  29. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Celletti R, Alcoforado G, Tecucianu JF, Etienne D. Osseotite implant: 3-year prospective multicenter evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:111-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00239.x
  30. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
  31. Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Branemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:671-7.
  32. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-80.
  33. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-16.
  34. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86-93.
  35. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:139-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.010
  36. Teixeira ER, Wadamoto M, Akagawa Y, Kimoto T. Clinical application of short hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants to the posterior mandible: a five-year survival study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:166-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70121-5
  37. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86-93.
  38. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x

Cited by

  1. Survival of individual teeth after non-surgical endodontic treatment vol.41, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2017.41.3.201