DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Healing Process of Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Material Nine Months after Sinus Bone Graft: Micromorphometric and Histological Evaluation

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Jun, Sang-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Um, In-Woong (R&D Institute Korea Tooth Bank) ;
  • Kim, Sooyeon (KOREA INTERNATIONAL (GR.11))
  • Received : 2013.05.05
  • Accepted : 2013.09.21
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

Micromorphometric and histological examinations were conducted with a collected tissue specimen nine months after sinus bone graft using autogenous tooth bone graft material (AutoBT). As a result of micro-computed tomographic analysis, the total bone volume (graft material+new bone) was 76.45%, and the proportion of new bone was 45.4%. The bone mineral density and the average Hounsfield Unit of new bone were 0.26 and 1,164.69, respectively. The histological examination showed that AutoBT particles were united well with new bone. AutoBT was considered to have excellent bone healing ability after sinus graft and bone density that can resist repneumatization.

Keywords

References

  1. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  2. Velich N, Németh Z, Tóth C, Szabó G. Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:38-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200401000-00013
  3. Garg AK. Current concepts in augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of dental implants. Dent Implantol Update 2001;12:17-22.
  4. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  5. Tajima N, Ohba S, Sawase T, Asahina I. Evaluation of sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement using platelet-rich fibrin as sole grafting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:77-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2613
  6. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Kim YK, Oh JS, Jeong MA, Park JJ. Clinical study of graft materials using autogenous teeth in maxillary sinus augmentation. Implant Dent 2011;20:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182386d74
  7. Lee JY, Kim YK, Kim SG, Lim SC. Histomorphometric study of sinus bone graft using various graft material. J Dental Rehabilitation Appl Sci 2011;27:141-7.
  8. Kim SG, Kim YK, Lim SC, Kim KW, Um IW. Histomorphometric analysis of bone graft using autogenous tooth bone graft. Implantology 2011;15:134-41.
  9. Huang HL, Chen MY, Hsu JT, Li YF, Chang CH, Chen KT. Three-dimensional bone structure and bone mineral density evaluations of autogenous bone graft after sinus augmentation:a microcomputed tomography analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1098-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02273.x
  10. Lundgren S, Moy P, Johansson C, Nilsson H. Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with particulated mandible: a histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:760-6.
  11. Chackartchi T, Iezzi G, Goldstein M, et al. Sinus floor augmentation using large (1-2 mm) or small (0.25-1 mm) bovine bone mineral particles: a prospective, intra-individual controlled clinical, micro-computerized tomography and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:473-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02032.x

Cited by

  1. Applications of Moldable Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft (M-AutoBT) Mixed with Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose for Sinus Lifting vol.24, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.24.391
  2. The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review vol.11, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041853