DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Combined Open Door Laminoplasty with Unilateral Screw Fixation for Unstable Multi-Level Cervical Stenosis : A Preliminary Report

  • Son, Seong (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University, Gil Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang Gu (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University, Gil Hospital) ;
  • Park, Chan Woo (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University, Gil Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Woo Kyung (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University, Gil Hospital)
  • Received : 2012.08.21
  • Accepted : 2013.02.04
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

Objective : The authors reviewed their experiences of combined surgery (open door laminoplasty with unilateral screw fixation) for unstable multi-level cervical stenosis, to clarify the situation regarding the surgical approach most appropriate for the treatment of diffuse unstable multi-level cervical stenosis. Methods : From January 2011 to January 2012, combined surgery was performed for unstable multi-level cervical stenosis by one surgeon at our institution. The subjects of this study were 6 men of mean age 53.7 years (range, 48-71) with a mean follow-up of 9.3 (range, 3-14) months. All imaging studies showed severe multi-level cervical stenosis with spinal cord signal change, and instability or kyphotic deformity. A retrospective review of clinical, radiological, and surgical data was conducted. Results : Average laminoplasty level was 4.8 and the average screw fixation level was 5.0. Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved from an average of 5.2 to 11.2 points. According to Nurick's grades and Odom's criteria, symptom improvement was statistically significant. On the other hand, Cobb's angle changes were not significant. Average operation time was 5.86 hours with an average blood loss of 460 mL. No significant surgical complication was encountered. Conclusion : Despite the small cohort and the short follow-up duration, the present study demonstrates that laminoplasty with unilateral screw fixation is a safe and effective treatment for unstable multi-level cervical stenosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Albert TJ, Vacarro A : Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 : 2738-2745, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199812150-00014
  2. Chen HC, Chang MC, Yu WK, Wang ST, Liu CL, Chen TH : Lateral mass anchoring screws for cervical laminoplasty : preliminary report of a novel technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 21 : 387-392, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318157c699
  3. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, et al. : Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 2998-3005, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b
  4. Herkowitz HN : A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 774-780, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00011
  5. Herkowitz HN : Cervical laminaplasty : its role in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Spinal Disord 1 : 179-188, 1988
  6. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K : Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 870-876, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00032
  7. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K : Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res : 35-48, 1999
  8. Houten JK, Cooper PR : Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament : effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery 52 : 1081-1087; discussion 1087-1088, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000057746.74779.55
  9. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. : Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament : Part 1 : clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 647-653, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000257560.91147.86
  10. Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward JC : Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 (3 Suppl) : S56-S63, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103001-00010
  11. Kamikozuru M : [Significance of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy due to the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament]. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 65 : 431-440, 1991
  12. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, Saika M, Taguchi T : Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori's method). Procedure and follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 1245-1250, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198811000-00007
  13. Kim JG, Kim SW, Lee SM, Shin H : Surgical result of the combined anterior and posterior approach in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 39 : 188-191, 2006
  14. Kim YS, Chin DK, Cho YE, Jin BH, Yoon YS, Park JP, et al. : Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 26:1237-1245, 1997
  15. Kumar VG, Rea GL, Mervis LJ, McGregor JM : Cervical spondylotic myelopathy : functional and radiographic long-term outcome after laminectomy and posterior fusion. Neurosurgery 44 : 771-777; discussion 777-778, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199904000-00046
  16. Lee TT, Green BA, Gromelski EB : Safety and stability of open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 11 : 12-15, 1998
  17. Matsumura A, Yanaka K, Akutsu H, Noguchi S, Moritake T, Nose T : Combined laminoplasty with posterior lateral mass plate for unstable spondylotic cervical canal stenosis--technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43 : 514-519; discussion 519, 2003 https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.43.514
  18. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nakanisi K : Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy. Spinal Cord 37 : 20-24, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100749
  19. Mizuno J, Nakagawa H : Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament : management strategies and outcomes. Spine J 6 (6 Suppl) : 282S-288S, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.009
  20. Morimoto T, Yamada T, Okumura Y, Kakizaki T, Kawaguchi S, Hiramatsu K, et al. : Expanding laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy-spinous process roofing technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138 : 720-725, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01411478
  21. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE Jr : Combined ventral and dorsal surgery for myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. Neurosurgery 60 (1 Supp1 1) : S82-S89, 2007
  22. Nakano K, Harata S, Suetsuna F, Araki T, Itoh J : Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17 (3 Suppl) : S41-S43, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199203001-00009
  23. Nakase H, Park YS, Kimura H, Sakaki T, Morimoto T : Complications and long-term follow-up results in titanium mesh cage reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 19 : 353-357, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000210113.09521.aa
  24. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K : Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 507-510, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199403000-00003
  25. Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, Hirabayashi K : Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J 1 : 26-30, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00008-0
  26. Shikata J, Yamamuro T, Shimizu K, Saito T : Combined laminoplasty and posterolateral fusion for spinal canal surgery in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res : 92-99, 1990
  27. Shinomiya K, Okamoto A, Kamikozuru M, Furuya K, Yamaura I : An analysis of failures in primary cervical anterior spinal cord decompression and fusion. J Spinal Disord 6 : 277-288, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199306040-00001
  28. Sim SJ, Cho JH, Yoo SI, Kown YD, Lee YS : Clinical analysis of postoperative prognostic factors of cervical anterior decompression and interbody fusion for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 29 : 360-364, 2000
  29. Subramaniam V, Chamberlain RH, Theodore N, Baek S, Safavi-Abbasi S, Senoğlu M, et al. : Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy : stenosis and stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : E573-E578, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa0214
  30. Suzuki F, Nakajima M, Matsuda M : Cervical cord compression caused by a pillow in a postlaminectomy patient undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Case report. J Neurosurg 90 (1 Suppl) : 145-147, 1999 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0145
  31. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Toribatake Y, Heller JG : Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 : 32-37, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199801010-00007
  32. Vitarbo E, Sheth RN, Levi AD : Open-door expansile cervical laminoplasty. Neurosurgery 60 (1 Suppl 1) : S154-S159, 2007
  33. Wiggins GC, Shaffrey CI : Dorsal surgery for myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. Neurosurgery 60 (1 Suppl 1) : S71-S81, 2007

Cited by

  1. Preliminary Experiences of the Combined Midline-Splitting French Door Laminoplasty with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Plate for Cervical Spondylosis and OPLL vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2015.12.2.48