Quality Verification for Respiratory Gated Proton Therapy

호흡동조 양성자치료의 Quality Verification

  • Kim, Eun Sook (Department of Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Jang, Yo Jong (Department of Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, Ji Yeon (Department of Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Kang, Dong Yun (Department of Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Yeom, Doo Seok (Department of Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center)
  • 김은숙 (국립암센터 양성자치료센터) ;
  • 장요종 (국립암센터 양성자치료센터) ;
  • 박지연 (국립암센터 양성자치료센터) ;
  • 강동윤 (국립암센터 양성자치료센터) ;
  • 염두석 (국립암센터 양성자치료센터)
  • Received : 2013.05.30
  • Accepted : 2013.09.03
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: To verify accuracy of respiratory gated proton therapy by measuring and analyzing proton beam delivered when respiratory gated proton therapy is being performed in our institute. Materials and Methods: The plan data of 3 patients who took respiratory gated proton therapy were used to deliver proton beam from proton therapy system. The manufactured moving phantom was used to apply respiratory gating system to reproduce proton beam which was partially irradiated. The key characteristics of proton beam, range, spreat-out Bragg peak (SOBP) and output factor were measured 5 times and the same categories were measured in the continuous proton beam which was not performed with respiratory gating system. Multi-layer ionization chamber was used to measure range and SOBP, and Scanditronix Wellhofer and farmer chamber was used to measure output factor. Results: The average ranges of 3 patients (A, B, C), who had taken respiratory gated proton therapy or not, were (A) 7.226, 7.230, (B) 12.216, 12.220 and (C) 19.918, 19.920 $g/cm^2$ and average SOBP were (A) 4.950, 4.940, (B) 6.496, 6.512 and (C) 8.486, 8.490 $g/cm^2$. And average output factor were (A) 0.985, 0.984 (B) 1.026, 1.027 and (C) 1.138, 1.136 cGy/MU. The differences of average range were -0.004, -0.004, -0.002 $g/cm^2$, that of SOBP were 0.010, -0.016, -0.004 $g/cm^2$ and that of output factor were 0.001, -0.001, 0.002 cGy/MU. Conclusion: It is observed that the range, SOBP and output factor of proton beam delivered when respiratory gated proton therapy is being performed have the same beam quality with no significant difference compared to the proton beam which was continuously irradiated. Therefore, this study verified the quality of proton beam delivered when respiratory gated proton therapy and confirmed the accuracy of proton therapy using this.

목 적: 호흡동조 시스템을 이용한 양성자치료 시 생성되는 양성자빔을 측정하고 분석함으로써 호흡동조 양성자치료의 정확성을 검증하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 호흡동조 양성자치료를 실시한 환자 세 명의 치료계획을 이용하여 양성자 치료 시스템에서 양성자빔을 생성했다. 이때 자체 제작한 구동 팬톰을 사용하여 호흡동조 시스템을 적용해 분할 조사되는 양성자빔을 재현하였다. 양성자빔의 중요특성인 Range, Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP), Output factor를 각 5회씩 측정하였으며 호흡동조 시스템을 적용하지 않은 연속 양성자빔에서도 동일한 항목들을 측정했다. Range와 SOBP 측정에는 Multi-Layer Ionization Chamber, Output factor 측정에는 Scanditronix Wellhofer와 Farmer chamber를 사용했다. 결 과: 호흡동조 시스템을 적용한 경우 세 환자의 평균 Range는 7.226, 12.216, 19.918 $g/cm^2$, SOBP는 4.950, 6.496, 8.486 $g/cm^2$, Output factor는 0.985, 1.026, 1.138 cGy/MU였으며, 적용하지 않은 경우 평균 Range는 7.230, 12.220, 19.920 $g/cm^2$, SOBP는 4.940, 6.512, 8.490 $g/cm^2$, Output factor는 0.984, 1.027, 1.136 cGy/MU로 측정됐다. 평균 Range의 차는 -0.004, -0.004, -0.002 $g/cm^2$, SOBP는 0.010, -0.016, -0.004 $g/cm^2$, Output factor는 0.001, -0.001, 0.002 cGy/MU로 나타났다. 결 론: 호흡동조 양성자치료 시 분할 조사된 양성자빔과 연속 조사된 양성자빔의 Range, SOBP 및 Output factor 모두 차이가 미미했다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 호흡동조 시 발생된 양성자빔의 선질을 검증하였고 이를 이용한 양성자치료의 정확성 또한 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wieszczycka W, Scharf WH: Proton radiotherapy accelerators. 1st ed. Singapore: World Scientific Publising Co. Pte. Ltd., 2001;1-23
  2. Kim DY, Park SY: Proton beam therapy. J Korean Med Assoc 2008;51:638-642 https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2008.51.7.638
  3. Shin DH, Yoo SH, Moon SH, Yoon M, Lee SB, Park SY: Eye tracking and gating system for proton therapy of orbital tumors. Phys Med 2012;39:4265-4272 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4729708
  4. Lu HM, Brett R, Sharp G, et al.: A respiratory-gated treatment system for proton therapy. Phys Med 2007;34:3273- 3278 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2756602
  5. Engelsman M, Lu HM, Herrup D, Bussiere M, Kooy HM: Commissioning a passive-scattering proton therapy nozzle for accurate SOBP delivery. Phys Med 2009;36:2172-2180 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3121489
  6. Kim DW, Lim YK, Ahn SH, et al.: Prediction of output factor, range, and spread-out bragg peak for proton therapy. Medical Dosimetry 2011;36:145-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2010.02.006