Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic characteristics of hybrid tower of cable-stayed bridges

  • Abdel Raheem, Shehata E. (Faculty of Engineering, Taibah University)
  • Received : 2013.11.13
  • Accepted : 2014.04.23
  • Published : 2014.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The dynamic characterization is important in making accurate predictions of the seismic response of the hybrid structures dominated by different damping mechanisms. Different damping characteristics arise from the construction of the tower with different materials: steel for the upper part; reinforced concrete for the lower main part and interaction with supporting soil. The process of modeling damping matrices and experimental verification is challenging because damping cannot be determined via static tests as can mass and stiffness. The assumption of classical damping is not appropriate if the system to be analyzed consists of two or more parts with significantly different levels of damping, such as steel/concrete mixed structure - supporting soil coupled system. The dynamic response of structures is critically determined by the damping mechanisms, and its value is very important for the design and analysis of vibrating structures. An analytical approach capable of evaluating the equivalent modal damping ratio from structural components is desirable for improving seismic design. Two approaches are considered to define and investigate dynamic characteristics of hybrid tower of cable-stayed bridges: The first approach makes use of a simplified approximation of two lumped masses to investigate the structure irregularity effects including damping of different material, mass ratio, frequency ratio on dynamic characteristics and modal damping; the second approach employs a detailed numerical step-by step integration procedure in which the damping matrices of the upper and the lower substructures are modeled with the Rayleigh damping formulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdel Raheem, S.E. and Hayashikawa, T. (2007), "Damping characteristics in soil-foundation- superstructure interaction model of cable-stayed bridges tower", J. Construct. Steel, Japanese Society of Steel Construct. - JSSC, 15, 261-268.
  2. Abdel Raheem, S.E. and Hayashikawa, T. (2008), "Vibration and Damping Characteristics of Cable-Stayed Bridges Tower", International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering - IABSE Conference, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Bridges, Buildings and Construction Practice, Helsinki, Finland, June, Paper ID F15.
  3. Abdel Raheem, S.E. and Hayashikawa, T. (2013a), "Energy dissipation system for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge towers", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 5(6), 657-678. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.6.657
  4. Abdel Raheem, S.E., and Hayashikawa, T. (2013b), "Soil-structure interaction modeling effects on seismic response of a cable-stayed bridge tower", Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng., 5(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6695-5-1
  5. Abdel Raheem, S.E., Hayashikawa, T. and Hashimoto, I. (2003), "Effects of soil-foundation-superstructure interaction on seismic response of cable-stayed bridges tower with spread footing foundation", J. Struct. Eng. - JSCE, 49A, 475-486, 2003.
  6. Abdel Raheem, S.E., Hayashikawa, T. and Dorka, U. (2009), "Seismic Performance of Cable-Stayed Bridge Towers: Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis, Structural Control and Seismic Design", VDM Verlag, ISBN: 978-3639202236.
  7. Adhikari, A. (2004), "Optimal complex modes and an index of damping non-proportionality", Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 18(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00048-7
  8. Angeles, J. and Ostrovskaya, S. (2002), "The proportional damping matrix of arbitrarily damped linear mechanical systems", J. Appl. Mech., 69(5), 649-656. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1483832
  9. Bert, C.W. (1973), "Material damping: an introductory review of mathematical models, measure and experimental techniques", J. Sound Vib., 29(2), 129 -153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80131-2
  10. Bread, C.F. (1979), "Damping in structural joints", J. Shock Vib. Digest, 11(9), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310247901100609
  11. Chang, S.-Y. (2013), "Nonlinear performance of classical damping", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 12(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0171-3
  12. Chopra, A.K. (1995), Dynamic of Structures - Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
  13. Claret, A.M. and Venancio-Filho, F. (1991), "A modal superposition method pseudo-force method for dynamic analysis of structural systems with non-proportional damping", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Eng., 20(4), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290200402
  14. Ding, N.H., Lin, L.X. and Chen, J.D. (2011), "Seismic response analysis of double chains suspension bridge considering non-classical damping", Adv. Mater. Res., 255-260, 826-830. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.826
  15. Du, Y., Li, H. and Spencer, Jr.B.F. (2002), "Effect of non-proportional damping on seismic isolation", J. Struct. Control, 9(3), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.13
  16. Falsone, G. and Muscolino, G. (2004), "New real-value modal combination rules for non-classically damped structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Eng., 33(12), 1187-12094. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.394
  17. Hayashikawa, T., Abdel Raheem, S.E. and Hashimoto I. (2004), "Nonlinear seismic response of soil-foundation-structure interaction model of cable-stayed bridges tower", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August, Paper No. 3045.
  18. Huang, B.C., Leung, A.Y.T., Lam, K.M. and Cheung, Y.K. (1995), "Analytical determination of equivalent modal damping ratios of a composite tower in wind-induced vibrations", Comput. Struct., 59(2), 311-316.
  19. Japan Road Association (1996), Chapter 7-9: Reference for highway bridge design, Specification for highway bridges-part IV substructures.
  20. Japan Road Association (2002), Specification for highway bridges-Part V Seismic design, Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan.
  21. Johnson, C.D. and Kienhholz, D.A. (1982), "Finite element prediction of damping in structures", Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 20(9), 1284-1290. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.51190
  22. Kawashima, K., Unjoh, S. and Tunomoto, M. (1993), "Estimation of damping ratio of cable-stayed bridges for seismic design", J. Struct. Eng., 119(4), 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1015)
  23. Khanlari, K. and Ghafory-Ashtiany, M. (2005), "New approaches for non-classically damped system Eigen analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Eng., 34(9), 1073-1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.467
  24. Lee, S.-H., Min, K.-W., Hwang, J.-S. and Kim, J. (2004), "Evaluation of equivalent damping ratio of a structure with added dampers", Eng. Struct., 26(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.014
  25. Papageorgiou, A.V. and Gantes, C.J. (2010), "Equivalent modal damping ratios for concrete/steel mixed structures", Comput. Struct., 88(19-20), 1124-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.06.014
  26. Papageorgiou, A.V. and Gantes, C.J. (2011), "Equivalent uniform damping ratios for linear irregularly damped concrete/steel mixed structures", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(3), 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.09.010
  27. Park, D. and Hashash, Y.M.A. (2004), "Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(2), 249-274
  28. Petrini, L., Maggi, C., Priestley, M.J.N. and Calvi, G.M. (2008), "Experimental verification of viscous damping modelling for inelastic time history analyses", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801925822
  29. Prater, G. and Singh, R. (1990), "Eigenproblem formulation, solution and interpretation for nonproportionally damped continuous beams", J. Sound Vib., 143(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(90)90572-H
  30. Prells, U. and Friswell, M.I. (2000), "A measure of non-proportional damping", Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 14(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1999.1280
  31. Qin, Q. and Lou, L. (2000), "Effects of non proportional damping on the seismic responses of suspension bridges", Proceedings of the 12th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January-February, Paper No. 0529.
  32. Qu, Z.-Q., Selvam, R.P. and Jung, Y. (2003), "Model condensation for non-classically damped systems-part ii: iterative schemes for dynamic condensation", Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 17(5), 1017-1032. DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2002.1527
  33. Raggett, J.D. (1975), "Estimation of damping of real structures", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 101(9), 1823-1835.
  34. Veletsos, A.S. and Ventura, C.E. (1986), "Model analysis of non-classically damped linear systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 14(2), 217-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290140205
  35. Villaverde, R. (2008), "A complex modal superposition method for the seismic analysis of structures with supplemental dampers", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 14WCEE, Beijing, China, October.
  36. Warburton, G.B. and Soni, S.R. (1977), "Errors in response calculations for non-classically damped structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 5(4), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050404
  37. Xu, J., DeGrassi, G. and Chokshi, N. (2004a), "A NRC-BNL benchmark evaluation of seismic analysis methods for non-classically damped coupled systems", Nucl. Eng. Design, 228(1-3), 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.06.019
  38. Xu, J., DeGrassi, G. and Chokshi, N. (2004b), "Insights Gleaned from NRC-BNL benchmark evaluation of seismic analysis methods for non-classically damped coupled systems", J. Press. Vessel Tech., 126(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1638388

Cited by

  1. Dynamic behavior of hybrid framed arch railway bridge under moving trains vol.15, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1594314
  2. Aerodynamic performance evaluation of different cable-stayed bridges with composite decks vol.34, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.5.699