DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

One step multiplex RT-PCR preventing DNA carryover contamination for differential diagnosis of swine influenza viruses

DNA 교차 오염 방지 기능을 가진 돼지 인플루엔자바이러스 감별진단용 one-step multiplex RT-PCR 진단법

  • Kim, Hee-Jung (College of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Disease Intervention Center, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Mi (College of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Disease Intervention Center, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Shin, Yeun-Kyung (Virology Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Song, Jae-Young (Virology Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hee (Disease Diagnostic Center, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Ki (Disease Diagnostic Center, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Lee, Myoung-Heon (Disease Diagnostic Center, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hwa (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.) ;
  • Park, Jun-Cheol (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.) ;
  • Yeo, Sang-Geon (College of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Disease Intervention Center, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Choi-Kyu (College of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Disease Intervention Center, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김희정 (경북대학교 수의과대학 & 수의전염병제어센터) ;
  • 김은미 (경북대학교 수의과대학 & 수의전염병제어센터) ;
  • 신연경 (농림축산검역본부 바이러스과) ;
  • 송재영 (농림축산검역본부 바이러스과) ;
  • 김성희 (농림축산검역본부 질병진단과) ;
  • 이경기 (농림축산검역본부 질병진단과) ;
  • 이명헌 (농림축산검역본부 질병진단과) ;
  • 김영화 (국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박준철 (국립축산과학원) ;
  • 여상건 (경북대학교 수의과대학 & 수의전염병제어센터) ;
  • 박최규 (경북대학교 수의과대학 & 수의전염병제어센터)
  • Received : 2014.10.31
  • Accepted : 2014.11.20
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

In this study, we developed a cost and time saving one-step multiplex RT-PCR for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of swine influenza viruses (SIV) and 2009 pandemic influenza H1N1 virus (pH1N1). The one-step multiplex RT-PCR using four sets of primer was confirmed to be capable of detection of all SIV subtypes and differential diagnosis of major SIV subtype H1, H3 and pH1N1 on individual or mixed viral culture samples. The sensitivity of the multiplex RT-PCR was determined to be at least $2^{-6}$ $HA/25{\mu}L$ of the presented SIVs, providing sufficient efficacy for a routine SIV monitoring in diagnostic laboratories. In addition, compared with the conventional RT-PCR methods that cannot avoid the carryover DNA contamination, the developed RT-PCR applied with the uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) system was proven to prevent a false positive reaction by carryover contamination of the pre-amplified DNA. In conclusion, the one-step RT-PCR with UNG system could be applicable to detect and differentiate of SIV from the viral cultures without worry of carryover DNA contamination in clinical laboratories.

Keywords

References

  1. Aslanzadeh J. 2004. Preventing PCR amplification carryover contamination in a clinical laboratory. Annals Clin Lab Sci 34: 389-396.
  2. Aunyaratana T, Rachod T, Ranida T, Donreuthai S, Roongroje T, Alongkorn A, Kanisak O, Pravina K. 2011. Single-step multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for detection and differentiation of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza A virus pandemic in Thao swine populations. J Vet Diagn Invest 23: 1017-1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638711416620
  3. Chiapponi C, Moreno A, Barbieri I, Merenda M, Foni E. 2012. Multiplex RT-PCR assay for differentiating European swine influenza virus subtype H1N1, H1N2, H3N2. J Virol Methods 184: 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.05.020
  4. Duncan BK. 1981. DNA glycosylases. pp. 565-586. In: Boyer P(ed). The Enzymes. 3rd ed. Academic Press, New York.
  5. Hass J, Matuszewski S, Cieslik D, Haase M. 2011. The role of swine as "mixing vessel" for interspecies transmission of the influenza A subtype H1N1: a simultaneous Bayesian inference of phylogeny and ancestral hosts. Infect Genet Evol 11: 437-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2010.12.001
  6. Fu G, Liu M, Zeng W, Pu J, Bi Y, Ma G, Liu J. 2010. Establishment of a multiplex RT-PCR assay to detect different lineages of swine H1 and H3 influenza A viruses. Virus Genes 41: 236-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-010-0508-1
  7. Kim SH, Moon OK, Lee KK, Song YK, Yeo CI, Bae CW, Yoon H, Lee OS, Lee JH, Park CK. 2011. Outbreak of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in pigs in Korea. Vet Rec 169: 155a.
  8. Kim SH, Roh IS, Lee KK, Park CK. 2014. A novel reassortant H1N2 virus related to the pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus isolated from Korean pigs. Virus Genes 48: 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-013-0996-x
  9. Kwok S and Higuchi R. 1989. Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature (London) 339: 237-238. https://doi.org/10.1038/339237a0
  10. Lee CS, Kang BK, Lee DH, Lyou SH, Park BK, Ann SK, Jung K, Song DS. 2008. One-step multiplex RT-PCR for detection and subtyping of swine influenza H1, H3, N1, N2 viruses in clinical samples using a dual priming oligonucleotide (DPO) system. J Virol Methods 151: 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.04.001
  11. Li Z, Li J, Zhang Y, Li L, Ma L, Li D, Gao F, Xia Z. 2012. Aerosolized avian influenza virus by laboratory manipulations. Virology J 9: 146(1-8).
  12. Longo MC, Beminger MS and Hartley JL. 1990. Use of uracil DNA glycosylase to control carry-over contamination in polymerase chain reactions. Gene 93: 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(90)90145-H
  13. Lorusso A, Faaberg KS, Killian ML, Koster L, Vincent AL. 2010. One-step real-time RT-PCR for pandemic influenza A virus (H1N1) 2009 matrix gene detection in swine samples. J Virol Methods 64: 83-87.
  14. Ma W, Lager KM, Lekcharoensuk P, Ulery ES, Janke BH, Solorzano A, Webby RJ, Garcia-Sastre A, Richt JA. 2010. Viral reassortment and transmission after co-infection of pigs with classical H1N1 and triple-reassortant H3N2 swine influenza viruses. J Gen Virol 91: 2314-2321. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.021402-0
  15. Matrosovich M, Stech J, Klenk HD. 2009. Influenza receptors, polymerase and host range. Rev Sci Tech 28: 203-217. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.28.1.1870
  16. Nagarajan MM, Simard G, Longtin D, Simard C. 2010. Single-step multiplex conventional and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays for simultaneous detection and subtype differentiation of Influenza A virus in swine. J Vet Diagn Invest 22: 402-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871002200309
  17. Pang J, Modlin J and Yolken R. 1992. Use of modified nucleotides and uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) for the control of contamination in the PCR-based amplification of RNA. Mol Cel Probes 6: 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-8508(92)90024-R
  18. Peiris JS, Poon LL, Guan Y. 2009. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A virus (S-OIV) H1N1 virus in humans. J Clin Virol 45: 169-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.006
  19. Persing DH. 1990. Polymerase chain reaction: trenches to benches. J Clin Microbiol 29: 1281-1285.
  20. Rys PN, Persing DH. 1993. Preventing false positives: quantitative evaluation of three protocols for inactivation of polymerase chain reaction amplification products. J Clin Microbiol 31: 2356-2360.
  21. Schnitzler SU, Schnitzler P. 2009. An update on swine-origin influenza virus A/H1N1: a review. Virus Genes 39: 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-009-0404-8
  22. Shin YK, Yoon SS, Song JY, Kim JB, Hang DT, Park JW, Kim MY, Kim SH, Park CK, Li OS. 2011. One-step multiplex reverse-transcriptase PCR for detectiong pandemic(H1N1) 2009 influenza virus. J Vet Med Sc. 73: 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.10-0218
  23. Tetzner R. 2009. Prevention of PCR cross-contamination by UNG treatment of bisulfite-treated DNA. Methods Mol Biol 507: 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-522-0_26
  24. Van Reeth K, Brown IH and Olsen CW. 2012. Influenza virus. pp. 557-571. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ and Stevenson GW(ed.). Diseases of Swine, 10th ed. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa.
  25. Vincent A, Awada L, Brown I, Chen H, Claes F, Dauphin G, Donis R, Culhane M, Hamilton K, Lewis N, Mumford E, Nguyen T, Parchariyanon S, Pasick J, Pavade G, Pereda A, Peiris M, Saito T, Swenson S, Van Reeth K, Webby R, Wong F, Ciacci-Zanella J. 2014. Review of influenza A virus in swine worldwide: a call for increased surveillance and research. Zoonoses Public Health 61: 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12049
  26. Vijaykrishna D, Poon LL, Zhu HC, Ma SK, Li OT, Cheung CL, Smith GJ, Peiris JS, Guan Y. 2010. Reassortment of pandemic H1N1/2009 influenza A virus in swine. Science 328: 1529. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189132
  27. Wang R, Taubenberger JK. 2010. Methods for molecular surveillance of influenza. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8: 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1586/eri.10.24
  28. OIE. 2012. Manual of diagnostic test and Vaccines for terrestrial Animals. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.03.04_AI.pdf
  29. WHO. 2010. Pandemic(H1N1)2009-update100. http://www.who.int/csr/don/2010_05_14/en/index.html