DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Approximate Calculation Model for Electromagnetic Devices Based on a User-Defined Interpolating Function

  • Ye, Xuerong (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Deng, Jie (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Wang, Yingqi (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Zhai, Guofu (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2014.05.11
  • Accepted : 2014.11.04
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Optimization design and robust design are significant measures for improving the performance and reliability of electromagnetic devices (EMDs, specifically refer to relays, contactors in this paper). However, the implementation of the above-mentioned design requires substantial calculation; consequently, on the premise of guaranteeing precision, how to improve the calculation speed is a problem that needs to be solved. This paper proposes a new method for establishing an approximate model for the EMD. It builds a relationship between the input and output of the EMD with different coil voltages and air gaps, by using a user-defined interpolating function. The coefficient of the fitting function is determined based on a quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) method. The effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper is verified by the electromagnetic force calculation results of an electromagnetic relay with permanent magnet.

Keywords

References

  1. J. M. Parr, A. J. Keane, A. I. J. Forrester, and C. M. E. Holden, Engineering Optimization 44, 1147 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2011.637556
  2. Marco Amrhein and T. Krein, IEEE Trans. Magn. 24, 397 (2009).
  3. Marco Amrhein and T. Krein, IEEE Trans. Magn. 24, 587 (2009).
  4. Marco Amrhein and T. Krein, IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 339 (2010).
  5. C. Chillet and J. Y. Voyant, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 3004 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.947053
  6. F. Wurtz, J. Bigeon, and C. Poirson, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 1429 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.497516
  7. E. Atienza, M. Perrault, F. Wurtz, V. Mazauric, and J. Bigeon, IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 1659 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.877761
  8. A. Delale, L. Albert, L. Gerbaud, and F. Wurtz, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 830 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2004.824908
  9. V. Fischer, L. Gerbaud, and F. Wurtz, IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 1812 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.846487
  10. B. du Peloux, L. Gerbaud, F. Wurtz, V. Leconte, and F. Dorschner, IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 715 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.872010
  11. Hong-Song Choi, Dong-Hun Kim, Il-Han Park, and Song-Yop Hahn, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 3627 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.952677
  12. Guofu Zhai, Qiya Wang, and Wanbin Ren, IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 2194 (2004).
  13. Bin Xia, Ziyan Ren, and Chang-Seop Koh, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2356313
  14. J. B. Kim, K. Y. Hwang, and B. I. Kwon, IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 1078 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.2096409
  15. Zhigang Liu and Juan Du, Microcomputer Applications 32, 31 (2011).

Cited by

  1. Optimization Design for Dynamic Characters of Electromagnetic Apparatus Based on Niche Sorting Multi-objective Particle Swarm Algorithm vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2016.21.4.660