DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Acute toxicity assessment of camphor in bio-pesticides by using Daphnia magna and Danio rerio

  • Yim, Eun-Chae (Bioenergy and Biomaterials, Interdisciplinary Program of Graduate School for Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Joe (Department of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Jun (Department of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2014.06.20
  • Accepted : 2014.07.24
  • Published : 2014.01.01

Abstract

Objectives An ecofriendly alternative to chemical pesticides is bio-pesticides, which are derived from natural sources. The interest in bio-pesticides is based on the disadvantages associated with chemical pesticides. Methods We conducted acute toxicity assessments of camphor, a major component of bio-pesticides, by using Daphnia magna (D. magna) as well as assessed the morphological abnormalities that occurred in Danio rerio (D. rerio) embryos. Results The median effective concentration of camphor on D. magna after 48 hours was $395.0{\mu}M$, and the median lethal concentration on D. rerio embryos after 96 hours was $838.6{\mu}M$. The no observed effect concentration and predicted no effect concentration of camphor on D. magna, which was more sensitive than D. rerio, were calculated as $55.2{\mu}M$ and $3.95{\mu}M$, respectively. Morphological abnormalities in D. rerio embryos exposed to camphor increased over time. Coagulation, delayed hatching, yolk sac edema, pericardial edema, and pigmentation of embryos mainly appeared between 24 and 48 hours. Further, symptoms of scoliosis and head edema occurred after 72 hours. In addition, bent tails, ocular defects and collapsed symptoms of fertilized embryonic tissue were observed after 96 hours. Conclusions The camphor toxicity results suggest that continuous observations on the ecosystem are necessary to monitor toxicity in areas where biological pesticides containing camphor are sprayed.

Keywords

References

  1. Nam HS. Environmentally-friendly agriculture & biotic pesticide. KIC News 2011;14(4):12-18 (Korean).
  2. You AS, Choi YW, Jeong MH, Hong SS, Park YK, Jang HS, et al. Acute ecotoxicity evaluation of thyme white, clove bud, cassia, lavender, lemon eucalyptus essential oil of plant extracts. Korean J Pestic Sci 2011;15(4):350-356 (Korean).
  3. Hashimoto Y, Okubo E, Ito T, Yamaguchi M, Tanaka S. Changes in susceptibility of carp to several pesticides with growth. J Pestic Sci 1982;7(4):457-461. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.7.457
  4. Matsunake S. Pesticide design-strategy and tactics. In: Yamamoto I, Fukami J, editors. Pesticide design. Tokyo: Soft Sci Inc.; 1979, p. 1061-1062.
  5. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: fish embryo toxicity (FET) test; 2006 [cited 2014 Jun 20]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/36817070.pdf.
  6. van Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire T. Risk assessment of chemicals: an introduction. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007, p. 326-340.
  7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. acute immobilization test 2004 [cited 2014 Jun 20]. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9720201e.pdf?expires=1410363690&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=E89C93D5677FBC62C384B06802BFC0AD.
  8. Lammer E, Carr GJ, Wendler K, Rawlings JM, Belanger SE, Braunbeck T. Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test? Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2009;149(2):196-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.11.006
  9. Yim EC, Shin JJ, Park IT, Han HK, Kim SW, Cho H, et al. Acute toxicity assessment of new algicide, thiazolidinedione derivative (TD53) to marine ecosystem. Korean Soc Biotechnol Bioeng J 2011;26(1):7-12 (Korean).
  10. Duan Z1, Zhu L, Zhu L, Kun Y, Zhu X. Individual and joint toxic effects of pentachlorophenol and bisphenol A on the development of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2008; 71(3):774-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.01.021
  11. Love JN, Sammon M, Smereck J. Are one or two dangerous? Camphor exposure in toddlers. J Emerg Med 2004;27(1):49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.02.010
  12. Choi TY, Kim SM, Sohn KC, Kim CD, Lee JH, Yoon TJ. Zebrafish as an in vivo model for the study of skin cells. Korean J Invest Dermatol 2007;4(2):37-44 (Korean).

Cited by

  1. Acute toxicity assessment of Osthol content in bio-pesticides using two aquatic organisms vol.29, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2014020
  2. Larvicidal and histopathology effect of endophytic fungal extracts of Aspergillus tamarii against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus vol.6, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05331
  3. Action of Ganoderma lucidum mycelial growth filtrates on Erysiphe diffusa and embryotoxicity assessment in a chicken embryo model vol.65, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14232/abs.2021.1.47-57
  4. A Systematic Review to Compare Chemical Hazard Predictions of the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test With Mammalian Prenatal Developmental Toxicity vol.183, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfab072