DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison Between Consumers' Perceptions of Korean and US Quality Certification Marks for Agricultural Products

국내외 농산물 인증마크에 대한 소비자 인식의 비교

  • Park, Misun (Department of Tourism Management, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, BumJun (Department of Hotel and Foodservice Management, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ham, Sunny (Department of Tourism Management, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, Hanju (Department of Economics, Gachon University)
  • 박미선 (가천대학교 관광경영학과) ;
  • 이범준 (연세대학교 생활환경대학원 호텔외식경영전공) ;
  • 함선옥 (가천대학교 관광경영학과) ;
  • 이한주 (가천대학교 경제학과)
  • Received : 2014.06.28
  • Accepted : 2014.12.15
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine how consumers perceive certification marks for agricultural products. The study examined three agricultural product certifications, such as the certification of environment-friendly agricultural products, Good Agricultural Procuts (GAP) certification mark, and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) certification mark. A survey was utilized for data collection from adults over the age of 19 in November, 2013. A total of 390 questionnaires were distributed, and 300 of those were obtained for an analysis of the study. The results were as follows. First, consumers' awareness of, image of, and credibility on the agricultural products with the certification marks were not significantly different among the three certification marks except consumers' awareness. Second, consumers' purchase intentions for and willingness to pay for the agricultural products with the certification marks were not significantly different among the three certification marks. Third, these variables were not significantly different between buying group and non-buying group except consumers' awareness. Lastly, buying group and non-buying group were significantly different only in gender and marital status. The findings offer implications to the food and food service industry regarding consumers' purchase of certified agricultural products. Further, the study enforces the roles of food industry for environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi HR. 2009. The study of the effect of brand extrinsic cues on perceived quality, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Doctoral degree thesis, Kyung Hee University, pp 32-33
  2. Chaudhuri, A. & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. J. mark., 65(2), 81-93 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
  3. Huh EJ, Kim JW. 2010. Consumer knowledge and attitude to spending on environment-friendly agricultural products. Korean J. hum. ecol., 19(5):883-896 https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2010.19.5.883
  4. Hwang SH, Lee JH, Roh EJ. 2010. The study of characteristics of consumer purchasing private brand products at large-scale mart. J. distrib. res., 15(4):1-19
  5. Heo SW, Kim H. 2004. Green marketing strategies and willingness to pay for environment-friendly agricultural products in the metropolitan area. Korean J. Org. Agri., 12(3):317-331
  6. Im JA, Ko JT, Shin HJ. 2002. Cost analysis of GM agricultural products labelling system. Korean J. Agri. Manag. Policy, 29(4):675-694
  7. Janssen, M. & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: consumer preferences and willingnessto-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Qual. Prefer., 25(1):9-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004
  8. Kim DS. 2013. Eco-agricultural products, RFID traceability system, TAM(Ease, Usefulness), reliability, behavior intention. Korean J. Culin. Res., 19(1):103-120
  9. Kim KD, Lee JY, NamKung S. 2008. Purchase behavior of environment-friendly agricultural products by housewives in Seoul area. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci Nutr., 37(12):1667-1673 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.12.1667
  10. Kim M, Lee YJ. 2009. The effect of wellbeing lifestyle on perceived value and purchase of environmental-friendly food materials. J. Foodserv. Manag., 12(4):85-106
  11. Kim SC. 2005. Good agricultural practices system agro-food safety. Korean J. Pestic. Sci., 9(1):1-10
  12. Kim SH, Jeong DW, Kim GH. 2012. Analysis of the relationship among image, awareness, public confidence of certificate mark for environment-friendly agricultural products, and purchase intention. J. Foodserv. Manag. Soc. Korea, 15(6):359-383
  13. Kim SH, Jeong DW, Kim GH. 2012. Analysis of the relationship among image, awareness, public confidence of certificate mark for environment-friendly agricultural products, and purchase intension. J. Foodserv. Manag., 15(6):359-383
  14. Kim SY. 2012. Study on sustainable institutional foodservice from consumers' and providers' perspectives. Doctoral degree thesis, Seoul National University
  15. Kim YB, Yi HM, Goh JT. 2012. Analysis of agricultural products quality certification system status. J. Agric. Life Environ. Sci., 24(4):57-68
  16. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 1998. Quality certification and safety inspection for agricultural products. Korea, pp 21-24
  17. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2008. Consumers' attitudes and marketing strategies for environmentally friendly agriculture products. Korea, pp 30-32
  18. Lee CH, Hwang JH. 2013. A study on the factors of the environment-friendly agricultural product consumption on the favorability, purchase intention, and recommendation intention. Korean J. Org. Agric., 21(2):171-187 https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2013.21.2.171
  19. Lee CH, Lee YJ, Shim GS. 2005. Understanding and needs of consumers, producers regarding traceability of agriproducts. Korean J. Food Mark. Econ., 22(1):157-176
  20. Lee HS. 2010. The effect of foodservice corporation's below the line on brand awareness, brand image and purchase intention. Doctoral degree thesis, Kyung Hee University, pp 89-90
  21. Lee HS, Lim JH. 2008. SPSS 14.0 Manual. Bubmunsa, Kyunggi, pp 10-91
  22. Lee SI. 2007. A Study on the Effective Management of Good Agricultural Practices. Master's degree thesis, Konkuk University, pp 80-269
  23. Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Mark., 58(3):20-38
  24. Park HS, Jang EK. 2005. The influence of festival involvement and emotional image on residents' intention to participate in festival. J. Korean Soc. Sci., 4(2):55-73
  25. Park JH. 2004. A study on understanding and needs of consumers, producers and distributors regarding good agricultural practices. Korean J. Food Mark. Econ., 21(4):93-110
  26. Roe B. & Sheldon I. 2007. Credence good labeling: The efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approaches. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 89(4):1020-1033 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01024.x
  27. Sin CR, Kim JS. 2009. Consumer's recognition for the label system and policy of environment-friendly agricultural products. J. Agri. & Life Sci., 43(3):63-75
  28. Solomon M R. 2006. Consumer behaviour: a European perspective. Pearson education
  29. Spears N. & Singh S N. 2004. Measuring attitaude toward the brand and purchase intentions. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert., 26(2):53-66 https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
  30. Wier M, O'Doherty Jensen K, Andersen L M, Millock K. 2008. The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great britain and denmark compared. Food Policy, 33(5):406-421 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.01.002
  31. Yi HM, Kim YB, Goh JT. 2013. Analysis of consumer purchasing behavior on quality certification agricultural products. Kangwon J. Agri. & Life Sci, 25(1):55-67
  32. Zander K, Hamm U. 2010. Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food qual. prefer., 21(5):495-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006
  33. Newspaper of Agricultural Administration. Available from: http://www.ikpnews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=20533, [accessed 2014.02.16.]
  34. Statistics Korea. 2010. Population and Housing Census, Available from: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parentId=A#SubCont, [accessed 2014. 10. 10.]