The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of Silano-pen on the shear bond strength of resin to feldspathic porcelain and zirconia

실라노 펜의 적용이 장석계 도재 및 지르코니아와 레진의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Shin, Myoung-Sik (Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Yol (Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Soo (Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University)
  • 신명식 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원, 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 이정열 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원, 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 김민수 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원, 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 신상완 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원, 임상치의학연구소)
  • Received : 2013.07.03
  • Accepted : 2014.01.15
  • Published : 2014.01.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of applying Silano-pen to feldspathic porcelain and zirconia on shear bond strength with composite resin. Materials and methods: Feldspathic porcelain and zirconia specimens were produced into 30 per each 2 mm thick and 12 mm in diameter and their surface was made smooth and even and then embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were divided into each Group F (Feldspathic porcelain) and Group Z (Zirconia), (1) Hydrofluoric acid etching and silane (F1 & Z1), (2) Silano-pen and silane (F2 & Z2), (3) Hydrofluoric acid etching and Silano-pen, silane (F3 & Z3). After surface conditioning, substrate surfaces of the specimen were examined by SEM. Composite resin cylinders (2 mm high, 3 mm in diameter)were bonded to specimen and shear bond strength between ceramic and composite resin was measured by using universal testing machine. The measured values were statistically analyzed by using two way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (${\alpha}=.05$). Results: In the scanning electron micrograph of the treated ceramic surface, Group F2 and F3 appeared the high roughness and Group Z3 appeared the highest density of silica particle. In Feldspathic porcelain, the result of measuring shear bond strength showed that Group F3 was measured to be highest and Group F1 was measured to be lowest but there was no statistical significance among Groups. In zirconia, Group Z3 was measured to be highest and Group Z1 was measured to be lowest and there was statistical significance among Groups (P<.05). Conclusion: In zirconia, applying hydrofluoric acid etching and then Silano-pen and silane is effective for composite resin adhesion.

연구 목적: 본 연구의 목적은 장석형 도재와 지르코니아에 Silano-pen의 적용이 복합레진과의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 장석형 도재와 지르코니아를 지름 12 mm, 두께 2 mm 크기로 각각 30개씩 제작하여 표면을 고르고 평활하게 한 후 아크릴 레진에 포매 하였다. 각각 Group F와 Group Z로 나눈 후, (1) Group F1과 Z1은 불산 에칭과 실레인, (2) Group F2와 Z2는 Silano-pen과 실레인, (3) Group F3와 Z3는 불산 에칭과 Silano-pen, 실레인을 적용시켰다. 표면 처리 후, 각각의 시편의 표면을 주사전자현미경으로 관찰하였다. 높이 2 mm, 직경 3 mm의 복합레진을 붙여 광중합 하고 만능시험기를 이용하여 세라믹과 복합레진간의 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 측정값을 Two way ANOVA와 Tukey's multiple comparison test을 사용하여 통계 분석 하였다(${\alpha}=.05$). 결과: 주사전자현미경의 관찰에서 Group F2와 F3에서 가장 거친 표면을 볼 수 있었으며, Group Z3에서 실리카 입자의 분포밀도가 가장 높았다. 장석형 도재에서는 전단결합강도 측정 결과 Group F3가 가장 높게 측정되었고 Group F1이 가장 낮게 측정되었지만, Group간에 통계학적 유의성은 없었다. 지르코니아에서는 Group Z3가 가장 높게 측정되었고 Group Z1이 가장 낮게 측정되었으며, Group간에 모두 통계학적 유의성이 있었다. 결론: 지르코니아에서는 불산 에칭의 적용 후 Silano-pen과 실레인의 적용이 복합레진 접착에 효과적이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:464-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9
  2. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT Jr. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:526-31. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119843
  3. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2:305-13.
  4. Oh WS, Shen C. Effect of surface topography on the bond strength of a composite to three different types of ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:241-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00452-9
  5. Lee JY, Im EB. A shear bond strength of resin cements bonded to pressable porcelain with various surface treatments. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:379-86.
  6. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite- to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:119-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90294-2
  7. Pameijer CH, Louw NP, Fischer D. Repairing fractured porcelain: how surface preparation affects shear force resistance. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:203-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0170
  8. Diaz-Arnold AM, Wistrom DW, Aquilino SA, Swift EJ Jr. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:291-4.
  9. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26:130-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00346.x
  10. Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8
  11. Oh WS, Shen C. Effect of surface topography on the bond strength of a composite to three different types of ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:241-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00452-9
  12. Luthardt RG, Holzhuter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZPzirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2002;81:487-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100711
  13. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:60-5.
  14. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Damerau G. Spark erosion as a metal- resin bonding system. Dent Mater 2007;23:193-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.009
  15. Llobell A, Nicholls JI, Kois JC, Daly CH. Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:205-13.
  16. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  17. Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res 2008;87:666-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700705
  18. Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand 2007;65:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350701459753
  19. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:430-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016
  20. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003; 19:725-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  21. Rosen H. Chairside repair of ceramo-metallic restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1990;56:1029-33.
  22. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-N
  23. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021
  24. Heikkinen TT, Lassila LVJ, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Thermocycling effects on resin bond to silicatized and silanized zirconia. J Adhes Sci Technol 2009;23:1043-51. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856109X440155
  25. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  26. Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M. Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:267-72.
  27. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J 2008;27:99-104. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.99
  28. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501