DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Earthquake Damage Monitoring for Underground Structures Based Damage Detection Techniques

  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Urban railway systems are located under populated areas and are mostly constructed for underground structures which demand high standards of structural safety. However, the damage progression of underground structures is hard to evaluate and damaged underground structures may not effectively stand against successive earthquakes. This study attempts to examine initial damage-stage and to access structural damage condition of the ground structures using Earthquake Damage Monitoring (EDM) system. For actual underground structure, vulnerable damaged member of Ulchiro-3ga station is chosen by finite element analysis using applied artificial earthquake load, and then damage pattern and history of damaged members is obtained from measured acceleration data introduced unsupervised learning recognition. The result showed damage index obtained by damage scenario establishment using acceleration response of selected vulnerable members is useful. Initial damage state is detected for selected vulnerable member according to established damage scenario. Stiffness degrading ratio is increasing whereas the value of reliability interval is decreasing.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, J.H., Jang, Y.D., Jang, W.R. (2011). "Intelligent Monitoring of Seismic Damage Identification using Wireless Smart Sensors-Design and Validation," Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 7984, pp. 331-337.
  2. Shin, J.R., An, T.K., Kim, J.H., Lee, C.G., Nam, M.J., and Park, S.H. (2011). "Numerical Verification on the Structuralhealth Evaluation of Subway Stations based on Statistical Pattern Recognition Technique," Journal of Korea Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 12, No. 2, April, pp. 47-53.
  3. Shin, J.R., An, T.K., Lee, C.G., and Park, S.H. (2011). "Structural Health Monitoring Methodology based on Outlier Analysis using Acceleration of Subway Stations," 2011 Autumn Conference of Korea Society for Railway, pp. 281-286.
  4. Sazonov, E., and Klinkhachorn, P. (2005). "Optimal spatial sampling interval for damage detection by curvature or strain energy mode shapes," Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 285, pp. 783-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.08.021
  5. Dutta, A., and Talukdar, S. (2004). "Damage detection in bridges using accurate modal parameters," Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00227-5
  6. Nagayama, T., Spencer, B. F., and Rice, J. A. (2009). "Autonomous decentralized structural health monitoring using smart sensors," Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 16, No. 7-8, pp. 842-859.
  7. Spencer, Jr. B. F., Ruiz-Sandoval, M. E., and Kurata, N. (2004). "Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges," Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 11, pp. 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.48
  8. Park, G., Rutherford, A. C., Sohn, H., and Farrar, C. R. (2005). "An outlier analysis framework for impedance-based structural health monitoring," Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 286, pp. 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.10.013
  9. Park, S., Inman, D. J., and Yun, C. B. (2008). "An outlier analysis of MFC-based impedance sensing data for wireless structural health monitoring of railroad tracks," Engineering Structure, Vol. 30, pp. 2792-2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.02.019
  10. Xu, Z. D., and Wu, Z. (2007). "Energy damage detection strategy based on acceleration responses for long-span bridge structures," Engineering Structure, Vol. 29, pp. 609-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.004
  11. Chen, B. (2009). "A biologically inspired sensor network framework for autonomous structural health monitoring," In Proceedings of SPIE: Sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems, San Diego, California.
  12. Farrar, C. R., and Worden, K. (2007). "An introduction to structural health monitoring," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A - Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365, pp. 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928
  13. Kolakowski, P. (2007). "Structural health monitoring - A review with the emphasis on low-frequency methods," Engineering Transactions, IPPT, Vol. 55, pp. 239-275.
  14. Park, G., Cudney, H. H., and Inman, D. J. (2000). "Impedance- based health monitoring of civil structural components," Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 6, pp. 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153)
  15. Worden, K., Manson, G., and Fieller, N. R. J. (2000). "Damage detection using outlier analysis," Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 229, pp. 647-667. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2514
  16. Park, S., Yun, C. B., Roh, Y., and Lee, J. J. (2005). "Health monitoring of steel structures using impedance of thickness modes at PZT patches," Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 339-353. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2005.1.4.339
  17. Hashash, Y., Hook, J. J., and Schmidt, B. (2001). "Seismic design and analysis of underground structures," Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 247-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
  18. Elenas, A., and Meskouris, K. (2001). "Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures," Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  19. Barbat, A. H., Pujades, L. G., and Lantada, N. (2008). "Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: application to Barcelona," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 10-11, pp. 851-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006
  20. van der Hoeven, F., and van Nes, A. (2014). "Improving the design of urban underground space in metro stations using the space syntax methodology," Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 40, pp. 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.09.007