Journal of Information Technology Services (한국IT서비스학회지)

Korea Society of IT Services (한국IT서비스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Causal Relationship between the Expected Effects by Acceptance Attitudes of Smart Work

스마트워크에 대한 조직구성원의 수용태도와 기대효과간 인과관계에 관한연구

  • 박기호 (호서대학교 경영학부 디지털기술경영학전공)
  • Received : 2014.04.27
  • Accepted : 2014.10.29
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, I explored the causal relationship between acceptance attitudes and the expected effects of smart work. With the rapid development of smart technologies, lots of organizations try to innovate in the conventional working styles for maximizing organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Although many organizations wish to foster smart working environment, they don't have confidence in detailed action plans and effects from it. Therefore, this study that explores the causal relationship between acceptance attitudes and effects may have crucial meaning to organizations pursuing smart work. In this research empirically conducted by questionnaire survey, the acceptance attitudes as predictors and the expected effects of smart work as influenced variables were used. This research analyzed 118 collected data and multiple regression analysis. As a result of analysis, teleworking shows the positive relations to all of dependent variables. And others have a positive or negative influence on cognitive effects of smart work. Results of this study may give implications to organizations that want to implement smart work environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Barkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, "Next Generation Connectivity Report", 2010.
  2. Bush, W.R., "Telecommuting : The case of research software development", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.37, 1990.
  3. Cho, N.J., H.S. Han, K.H. Park, and S.R. Kwon, "Change of communication and future economic structures based on the convergence", Future Research based on the digital convergence(III) series 11-04, KISDI, 2011.
  4. Cho, S.H., "Teleworking in 2010 and change of working and residual environment", Journal of Informatization Policy, National Information Society Agency, 1997.
  5. Eaton, S.C., "If you can use them : Flexibility policies, organizational commitment and perceived performance", Industrial Relations, Vol.42, 2003, 145-167.
  6. Handy, S.L. and P.L. Mokhtarian, "Planning for Telecommuting : Measurement and Policy Issues", Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.61, No.1, 1995.
  7. Huws, H., Telework : Towards the Elusive Office, John Wiley and Sons, 1990.
  8. Jang, D.S., "Exploratory research on the moderating effect of Smart Work environment between cognition and performance of work for SM employee", Korean Society of Computer Information, Vol.17, No.2, 2012, 225-230. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2012.17.2.225
  9. Jung, C.H., "Issues for progressive trend and activation of smart work", JIPS, Vol.18, No.2, 2011, pp.82-89.
  10. Kang, Y.J., "Recognition of public officers about introducing telework", 2004 Symposium of The Korean association for governance, 2004, 1-23.
  11. Kim, F.V., "Direction of policies for strong global smart nation through balancing between life and work", ITA Journal, Vol.134, 2011, 14-19.
  12. Korea Communications Commission, "Master Plan for Smart Mobile 2010", 2010.
  13. Kwak, I.G., J.B. Kim, and N.Y. Lee, "Expansion of flexible working arrangement and activation of smart work center", JIPS, Vol.18, No.2, 2011, 59-72.
  14. Lee, J.S. and H.S. Kim, "A study on the current situation of smart work and activation issues", Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, Vol.13, No.4, 2010, 75-96.
  15. Marakas, G.M. and Y.Y. Mun, "The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer selfefficacy : Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research", Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No.2, 1998, 126-163. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.126
  16. NIA, "Future of Work-Smart Work", International conference of smart work, 2012.
  17. Oh, H.S., "Activation of entertainment in the age of smart work", Korean Entertainment Industry Association, Vol.3, No.1, 2011, 1-15.
  18. Park, J.K., "Case of smart work in Woongjin Holdings", Journal of Internet Information, Vol.12, No.2, 2011, 29-33.
  19. Park, K.H. and Y.J. Kim, "Difference in Acceptance Level of Smart Work among Tendencies of Personal Leadership Styles", Journal of Digital Policy and Management, Vol.11, No.11, 2013, 197-207.
  20. Pflaeging, N., Un-leadership : How to make Smart Work by getting rid of management, 2012.
  21. PwC, http://www.pwc.com/kr/ko/challenges/smartwork.jhtml?query=smart&live=1, 2012.
  22. Raghuram, S. and B. Wisenfeld, "Worknonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers", Human Resource Management, Vol. 43, 2004.
  23. Ramsower, R.M., Telecommuting : The Organizational and Behavioral Effects of Working at Home. UMI Research Press, 1985.
  24. Rane, A. and T. Argawal, "The Future of Workplace", 2011.
  25. Rothausen, T.J., "Job satisfaction and the parent workers : The role of flexibility and rewards", Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.44, 1994, 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1021
  26. Thomas, L.T. and D.C. Ganster, "Impact of family-supportive work variables on workfamily conflict and strain : A control perspective", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.80, 1995, 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6
  27. van Dyne, L., E. Kossek, and S. Lobel, "Less need to be there : Cross-level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group level OCB", Human Relations, Vol.60, 2007, 1123-1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707081657