DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Thermal Insulation and Evaporative Resistance of a Waterproof and Breathable Garment System

투습방수의류의 보온력 및 증발저항 평가와 관련 변인

  • Shim, Huen sup (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • Received : 2014.11.01
  • Accepted : 2014.12.05
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

This study evaluates the thermal insulation and evaporative resistance of a waterproof and breathable garment system and determines the factors influencing its thermal performance. The experimental garments were composed of underwear (shirts with 100% wool and 100% polyester) and outerwear (jackets and pants with a vapor-permeable membrane and a vapor-impermeable membrane). Data on clothing insulation in a dry condition ($10^{\circ}C$) and a wet condition ($10^{\circ}C$, 40% R.H.), evaporative resistance ($34^{\circ}C$, 40% R.H., and $10^{\circ}C$, 40% R.H.), and microclimate vapor pressure were collected and analyzed. According to the results, the thermal insulation of the experimental garment system ranged 1.27~1.40 in the dry condition and 0.40~0.89 in the wet condition at $10^{\circ}C$. Evaporative resistance ranged $41{\sim}525m^2Pa/W$. A decrease in thermal insulation by wetting underwear ranged 31~67% in the cold condition ($10^{\circ}C$). The breathability of the outer garment influenced the decrease in thermal insulation by wetting. The type of underwear fiber influenced the decrease in thermal insulation only when it was used with breathable outerwear. The vapor-permeable outerwear sample with polyester underwear (P_Perm) showed a larger decrease in insulation than that with wool (W_Perm). The evaporative resistance of the vapor-permeable ensemble showed no effect of underwear in the warm condition ($34^{\circ}C$), but polyester underwear showed lower evaporative resistance than wool in the cold condition ($10^{\circ}C$). The vapor-impermeable ensemble showed no difference in evaporative resistance between polyester underwear and wool underwear in both conditions. Future research should consider various clothing ensemble combinations and environmental conditions and evaluate wear comfort by using human subjects.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM F1291(2005) Standard test method for measuring the thermal insulation of clothing using a heated manikin. Ann Book ASTM Stand vol. 11.03, Am Soc Test Materials, PA
  2. ASTM F2370(2005) Standard test method for measuring the evaporative resistance of clothing using a sweating manikin. Ann Book ASTM Stand vol. 11.03, Am Soc Test Materials, PA
  3. Bernard TE, Matheen F(1999) Evaporative resistance and sustainable work under heat stress conditions for two cloth anticontamination ensembles. Int J Ind Ergon 23, 557-564 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00019-5
  4. Candas V, Broede P, Havenith G, Thermprotect network (2006) Classical approach to heat and vapor resistance calculations cannot explain heat transfer in wet clothing. Proc 6th Int Therm Manikin & Modelling Meet, pp235-246
  5. Fan J, Chen YS(2002) Measurement of clothing thermal insulation and moisture vapor resistance using a novel perspiring fabric thermal manikin. Meas Sc Technol 13, 1115-1123 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/13/7/320
  6. Kim EA, Yoo SJ, Shim, HS(2006) Performance of selected clothing systems under subzero conditions: determination of performance by a Human- Clothing- Environment Simulator. Text Res J 76(4), 301-308 https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517506057529
  7. McCullough EA(2001) Interlaboratory study of sweating manikins. Proceedings of the 4th Int Meet on Thermal Manikins, pp1-6
  8. Park HJ, Kim HJ, Hong KH(2008) Transient heat flux evaluation of underwear for protective clothing using sweating manikin. J Korean Soc Clothing Text 32(1), 157- 165 https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.1.157
  9. Patriot Net Daily(2014): Prevent cold injury, frostbite, and hypothermia. Available from http://www.patriotnetdaily.com/ [cited 2014 October 22]
  10. Wang F, Annaheim S, Morrissey M, Rossi R(2013) Evaporative cooling efficiency of one-layer tight fitting sportswear: a sweating torso manikin study. Proceedings the XV Int Conference on Environ Ergon (ICEE 2013), pp285-287
  11. Wang F, Gao CS, Kuklane K, Holmer I(2009) A Study on evaporative resistance of two skins designed for thermal manikin Tore under different environmental conditions. J Fiber Bioeng Inform 1(4), 301-305 https://doi.org/10.3993/jfbi03200908
  12. Wang F, Gao C, Kuklane K, Holmer(2011) Determination of clothing evaporative resistance on a sweating thermal manikin in an isothermal condition: heat loss method or mass loss method?. Ann Occup Hyg 55(7), 775-783 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mer034
  13. Wang SX, Tokura H, Hu JY, Han YX, Kowk YL, Au RW(2007) Effect of moisture management on functional performance of cold protective clothing. Text Res J 77(12), 968-980 https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517507083552