DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Morphological characterization of Korean and Turkish watermelon germplasm

  • Huh, Yun Chan (National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Hak Soon (National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Solmaz, Ilknur (Cukurova University, Faculty of Agric., Dept. of Hort.) ;
  • Sari, Nebahat (Cukurova University, Faculty of Agric., Dept. of Hort.) ;
  • Kim, Su (National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA)
  • Received : 2014.10.31
  • Accepted : 2014.12.31
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

A total of 67 watermelon accessions which include 37 accessions from Korean and 27 accessions from Turkish germplasm and 3 accessions of other related species from USA were investigated for morphological characteristics. The UPOV descriptor list for 56 characters (6 seedlings, 4 plants, 11 leaves, 5 flowers, 23 fruits and 7 seeds) was used in characterization. In addition, eight quantitative characters, hypocotyl length, cotyledon width, cotyledon length, fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, thickness of outer layer of pericarp and soluble solid content were also measured. The 56 qualitatively scored characters were analyzed by principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) while the eight quantitative ones were subjected to principle component analysis (PCA). Morphological characterization result demonstrated that the accessions displayed high morphological diversity(how much percent?). A high level of phenotypic diversity was observed from the results of morphological characterization. However, plant growth habit and leaf blade flecking showed constant characters for all of the accessions. The Korean and Turkish watermelon genotypes are diverse groups and can be separated by both multivariate analysis of morphological characters although the grouping was more apparent in PCoS results.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho YK. 2002. The current situation and direction of watermelon breeding in Korea. Symposium on development of watermelon industry. p. 21.
  2. FAO. 2014. Watermelon production in http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor on 30 October 2014.
  3. Guner N, Wehner T. 2004. The genes of watermelon. HortScience 39:1175-1182.
  4. Krasteva L. 2000. Watermelon Genetic Resources in Bulgaria. The 7th Eucarpia meeting on Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding. Acta Horticult 510:253-256.
  5. Lee JM, Choi GW, Janick J. 2007. Horticulture in Korea. Kor. Soc. Horticulture Science VOL: 56-61.
  6. Levi A, Thomas CE, Simmons AM, Thies JA. 2005. Analysis based on RAPD and ISSR markers reveals closer similarities among Citrullus and Cucumis species than with Praecitrullus fistulosus (Stocks) Pangalo. Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution 52:465-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-2260-2
  7. Robinson RW, Decker-Walters DS. 1997. Cucurbits. CAB Int. University Pres, Cambridge (GB) 226 p.
  8. Rohlf FJ. 1998. NTSYS-PC numerical Taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.00. Exeter software, Setauket, New York.
  9. Sari N, Solmaz I, Yetisir H, Unlu H. 2007. Watermelon genetic resources in Turkey and their characteristics. Acta Horticult. 731:433-438.
  10. SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS users guide; SAS/STAT, version 6. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, (NC, USA).

Cited by

  1. Characterization of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Accessions Introduced from USDA vol.51, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9787/kjbs.2019.51.4.357
  2. Comparative Profitability of Melon and Watermelon Production in South Konawe District of Southeast Sulawesi vol.17, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.91