DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty

  • Received : 2014.02.26
  • Accepted : 2014.07.10
  • Published : 2014.11.28

Abstract

Objective : The epidural fluid collection (EFC) as a complication of cranioplasty is not well-described in the literature. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the development of EFC as a complication of cranioplasty, and its outcomes. Methods : From January 2004 to December 2012, 117 cranioplasty were performed in our institution. One-hundred-and-six of these patients were classified as either having EFC, or not having EFC. The two groups were compared to identify risk factors for EFC. Statistical significance was tested using the t-test and chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. Results : Of the 117 patients undergoing cranioplasty, 59 (50.4%) suffered complications, and EFC occurred in 48 of the patients (41.0%). In the t-test and chi-test, risk factors for EFC were size of the skull defect (p=0.003) and postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space (p<0.001). In a logistic regression, the only statistically significant factor associated with development of EFC was the presence of postoperative air bubbles. The EFC disappeared or regressed over time in 30 of the 48 patients (62.5%), as shown by follow-up brain computed tomographic scan, but 17 patients (35.4%) required reoperation. Conclusion : EFC after cranioplasty is predicted by postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space. Most EFC can be treated conservatively. However, reoperation is necessary to resolve about a third of the cases. During cranioplasty, special attention is required when the skull defect is large, since EFC is then more likely.

Keywords

References

  1. Albanese J, Leone M, Alliez JR, Kaya JM, Antonini F, Alliez B, et al. : Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury : evaluation of the effects at one year. Crit Care Med 31 : 2535-2538, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000089927.67396.F3
  2. Beauchamp KM, Kashuk J, Moore EE, Bolles G, Rabb C, Seinfeld J, et al. : Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy : is timing of the essence? J Trauma 69 : 270-274, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e491c2
  3. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, et al. : Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery 58 (3 Suppl) : S16-S24; discussion Si-Siv, 2006
  4. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D : Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg 112 : 1120-1124, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.6.JNS09133
  5. Cho KC, Park SC, Choe IS, Seo DH : Safety and efficacy of early cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury patients. J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc 7 : 74-77, 2011 https://doi.org/10.13004/jknts.2011.7.2.74
  6. Chun HJ, Yi HJ : Efficacy and safety of early cranioplasty, at least within 1 month. J Craniofac Surg 22 : 203-207, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f753bd
  7. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D'Urso P, et al. : Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 364 : 1493-1502, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102077
  8. Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW : Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy : analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 26 : E9, 2009
  9. Lee JW, Kim JH, Kang HI, Moon BG, Lee SJ, Kim JS : Epidural fluid collection after cranioplasty : fate and predictive factors. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 50 : 231-234, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2011.50.3.231
  10. Liang W, Xiaofeng Y, Weiguo L, Gang S, Xuesheng Z, Fei C, et al. : Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 18 : 526-532, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180534348
  11. Liao CC, Kao MC : Cranioplasty for patients with severe depressed skull bone defect after cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Clin Neurosci 9 : 553-555, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2002.1116
  12. Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V : Clinical outcome in cranioplasty : critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 14 : 144-153, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200303000-00003
  13. Oh CH, Park CO, Hyun DK, Park HC, Yoon SH : Comparative study of outcomes between shunting after cranioplasty and in cranioplasty after shunting in large concave flaccid cranial defect with hydrocephalus. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 44 : 211-216, 2008 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2008.44.4.211
  14. Park JS, Lee KS, Shim JJ, Yoon SM, Choi WR, Doh JW : Large defect may cause infectious complications in cranioplasty. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42 : 89-91, 2007
  15. Piedra MP, Ragel BT, Dogan A, Coppa ND, Delashaw JB : Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. J Neurosurg 118 : 109-114, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.JNS121037
  16. Schuss P, Vatter H, Marquardt G, Imöhl L, Ulrich CT, Seifert V, et al. : Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy : the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma 29 : 1090-1095, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2176
  17. Simard JM, Sahuquillo J, Sheth KN, Kahle KT, Walcott BP : Managing malignant cerebral infarction. Curr Treat Options Neurol 13 : 217-229, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-010-0110-9
  18. Smith ER, Carter BS, Ogilvy CS : Proposed use of prophylactic decompressive craniectomy in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients presenting with associated large sylvian hematomas. Neurosurgery 51 : 117-124; discussion 124, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200207000-00018
  19. Sobani ZA, Shamim MS, Zafar SN, Qadeer M, Bilal N, Murtaza SG, et al. : Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy : an institutional audit and analysis of factors related to complications. Surg Neurol Int 2 : 123, 2011 https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.85055
  20. Stephens FL, Mossop CM, Bell RS, Tigno T Jr, Rosner MK, Kumar A, et al. : Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurg Focus 28 : E3, 2010
  21. Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Eisenberg HM : Craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 365 : 373; author reply 376, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1106421
  22. Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Sheth SA, Yanamadala V, Caracci JR, Asaad WF : Bilateral hemicraniectomy in non-penetrating traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29 : 1879-1885, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2012.2382
  23. Winkler PA, Stummer W, Linke R, Krishnan KG, Tatsch K : Influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism. J Neurosurg 93 : 53-61, 2000 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.1.0053

Cited by

  1. Fenestration of bone flap during interval autologous cranioplasty vol.6, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.172535
  2. Polymethylmethacrylate imbedded with antibiotics cranioplasty: An infection solution for moderate and large defects reconstruction? vol.7, pp.29, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.193725
  3. Initial Dead Space and Multiplicity of Bone Flap as Strong Risk Factors for Bone Flap Resorption after Cranioplasty for Traumatic Brain Injury vol.14, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2018.14.2.105
  4. Neurocritical Management of Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematomas vol.16, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2020.16.e43
  5. Surgical Management of Trauma-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage-a Review vol.20, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-020-01080-0
  6. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Silicone Elastomer Sheet during Decompressive Craniectomy: Anti-Adhesive Role in Cranioplasty vol.11, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010124
  7. Predictive Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cranioplasty: A Study Including 3D Printed Implants vol.12, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.745575
  8. Sinking Skin Flap Syndrome following Posttraumatic Hydrocephalus vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682310
  9. The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future vol.29, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550320928560