Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Performance Appraisal Politics in Team-Based Work Systems

팀제 하에서의 정치적 성과평가

  • Received : 2014.01.09
  • Accepted : 2014.01.28
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to investigate the relationships among the perceptions of performance appraisal politics(POPAP)), employee's attitude to work, and team-based work system characteristics. Using survey data from various occupationally heterogeneous sample of white-collar employees(N=195) from various organizations, the results indicate that when employees perceive performance rating to be manipulated because of rater's personal bias and punishment motive, they reduce organizational commitment. Contrarily, the employees' POPAP with motivational motive increases organizational commitment. And task interdependency has positive effect on employees' POPAP.

본 연구는 조직정치의 개념을 성과평가 행위의 상황적 맥락 요소로 반영한 정치적 성과평가 인식과 구성원 태도 및 팀 과업 특성과의 관계 파악을 목적으로 수행하였다. 195명의 기업 근로자를 대상으로 한 실증연구 결과 개인 편향 및 징벌적 의도에서 이루어진 정치적 성과평가 인식은 조직몰입에 부정적인 영향을, 동기부여적 의도에서의 정치적 성과평가는 조직몰입에 긍정적 영향을 미친다는 사실을 밝혔다. 또한 팀과업 특성으로서의 과업상호의존성은 정치적 성과평가 인식을 증가시킨다는 결과를 도출하였다. 추가적으로 연구결과가 시사하는 바와 향후 연구과제에 대해서도 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ilgen, D.R. and J.M. Feldman, "Performance Appraisal: A Process Focus", In Cummings, L. and B. Straw(Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.
  2. Landy, F.J. and J.L. Farr, "The Measurement of Work Performance", San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1983.
  3. Park, J.H, "Contextual Factors and Rating Behavior in the Peer Evaluation System", Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.175-183, Mar. 2012. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2012.17.3.175
  4. Shore, T. and J. Strauss, "The Political Context of Employee Appraisal: Effects of Organizational Goals on Performance Ratings", International Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.599-612, Dec. 2008.
  5. Bernardin, H.J. and R.W. Beatty, "Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work", Boston, MA: Kent, 1984.
  6. McShane, S.L. and M.A. Von Glinow, " Organizational Behavior: Emerging Realities for the Workplace Revolution", Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2007.
  7. Vigoda, E., "Stress-related Aftermaths to Workplace Politics: Job Distress and Aggressive Behavior in Organizations", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp.571-591, Aug. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.160
  8. Murphy, K.R., J.N. Cleveland, A.L. Skattebo, and T.B. Kinney, "Raters Who Pursue Different Goals Give Different Ratings", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp.158-164, Feb. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.158
  9. Wong , K.F.E. and J.Y.Y. Kwong, "Effects of Rater Goals on Rating Patterns: Evidence from a Field Study", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp.577-585, Mar. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.577
  10. Tziner, A. and K.R. Murphy, "Additional Evidence of Attitudinal Influences in Performance Appraisal", Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.407-419, Spring, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022982501606
  11. Gomez-Mejia, L.R., D.B. Balkin, and R.L. Cardy, "Managing Human Resources", Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.
  12. Salimaki, A. and S. Jamsen, "Perceptions of Politics and Fairness in Merit Pay", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.229-251, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011023721
  13. Tziner, A, K.R. Murphy, and J.N. Cleveland, "Contextual and Rater Factors Affecting Rating Behavior", Group & Organization Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 89-98, Feb. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104267920
  14. Curtis, A.B., R.D. Harvey, and D. Ravden, "Sources of Political Distortions in Performance Appraisals", Group and Organization Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp.42-60, Feb. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104267666
  15. Poon, J.M.L., "Effects of Performance Appraisal Politics on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention", Personnel Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp.322-334, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480410528850
  16. Glen, R.M., "Performance Appraisal: An Unnerving yet Useful Process", Public Personnel Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.1-10, Spring, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609001900101
  17. Longenecker, C. O, H.P.(Jt.) Sims, and D.A. Gioia, "Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal", The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 183-193, Aug. 1987. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1987.4275731
  18. Sogra, K.J, A.I. Shahid, and S. Najibullah, "Organizational Outcomes of the Employee's Perceptions of Performance Appraisal Politics: A Study on Executive MBA Students in Bangladesh", South Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp.43-60, Sep. 2009.
  19. Park, J.H and S.K. Kwon, "The effects of pay-for-performance on motivation in team-based work systems", The Korean Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.87-119, Sep. 2006.
  20. Williams, R.L. and K.L. Jones, "Making Sure the Automated Office's Advanced Capabilities Pay-off in Higher Productivity & Profits", Management Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp.27-31, Apr. 1984.
  21. Roland, E., J.R. Kedwell, and N. Bennett, "Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18. No. 3, pp.429-456, Jul. 1993.
  22. Campion, M., G.J. Medsker, and A.C. Heggs, "Relations Between Work Group Characteristics & Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups", Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp.822-850, Winter, 1993.
  23. Fielder, A. M., "The Effect of Vision Congruence on Employee Empowerment, Commitment, Satisfaction, & Performance", Doctoral Dissertation, Florida International University, 1993.
  24. Tziner, A., G.P. Latham, B.S. Price, and R. Haccoun, "Development and Validation of a Questionnaire for Measuring Perceived Political Considerations in Performance Appraisal", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp.179-190, Mar. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199603)17:2<179::AID-JOB740>3.0.CO;2-Z
  25. Cooke, D.K., "Discriminant validity of the organizational commitment questionnaire", Psychological Reports, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp.431-442, Apr. 1997. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.2.431