Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploration of Information Subject-centered Curriculum Integration Strategies for 21st Century Key Competencies Extension

21세기 핵심역량 신장을 위한 정보교과 중심의 통합 교육과정 전략 탐색

  • Huh, Min (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Wuk (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 허민 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 이태욱 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2013.08.14
  • Accepted : 2014.02.03
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently as the focal point of interdisciplinary integration of learner's key competencies have been increased, it was the real solution to avoid excessive curriculum and reconfiguration of curriculum to provide actual learning opportunities. The purpose of this paper was to investigate information subject-centered inclusive education strategies for 21st century key competencies extension by Delphi study. As a result by a total 3 round Delphi method, information subject-centered curriculum integration for key competencies extension was to understand why they should be integrated and what can makes it com true. This elicited the consensual agreements of experts about information subject-centered curriculum integration aims, methods, contents, and evaluations ets. As a result, this study offers strategies of information subject-centered curriculum integration applicable to elementary and middle schools.

최근 교과 간 통합의 구심점으로 학습자의 핵심역량이 대두되고 있으며, 핵심역량 줌심의 교과 간 통합은 실용적 측면에서 과도한 교육과정 내용에 대한 실제적 대처 방안이며, 교육과정 재구성과 공동 구성을 통해 풍부하고 실제적인 학습 기회를 제공하려는 것이다. 본 연구의 목적은 델파이 설문조사로 21세기 핵심역량 신장을 위한 정보교과 중심의 통합교육 방안을 마련하는 것이다. 총 3차에 걸쳐 이루어진 조사 결과 핵심역량 신장을 위한 정보교과 중심의 교육과정 통합이 왜 필요하며 어떤 방식으로 가능한가에 대한 구체적인 방안을 탐색하였다. 정보교과 중심의 통합 교육과정의 목표와 방법, 내용, 평가 등에 대한 전문가들의 합의를 도출하였다. 그 결과로 초 중등학교에 적용할 수 있는 정보교과 중심의 교육과정 통합 전략을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gwangbin Lim, "Future Education and Digital Textbook," Korea Textbook Research Foundation, text research, No. 51, 2007.
  2. Hipkins, R, "Competency-based curriculum design in New Zealand," A Presentation to the policies and practices of educational assessment of learning semina, Santander, Spain, July, 2008.
  3. Chung-Il Yun et al, "The Essential Characteristics and Dimensions of Competence as Human Ability," Journal of educational research, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2007.
  4. Ministry of Education, "The New Zealland curriculum," 2007.
  5. Maryline, C, "A deep change for school curriculum policies in France: The common base of knowledge and sills," Korea, April. 2011.
  6. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, "In Knowledge Based Society, the Basis Study for the Configuration of the School Curriculum(I,II)," 2008.
  7. European Commission, "Key competences for lifelong learning," Official Journal of the European Union, 2006.
  8. Kyung-hee So, "Competency' in the Context of Schooling : It's Meaning and Curricular Implications," The Jouranl of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 1-21, 2007.
  9. So, Kyunghee.Lee et al, "Review on Curriculum Reform in the Canadian Province of Quebec: The Possibilities and Limitations of Competency-based Curriculum," Korean Journal of Comparative Education, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.87-105, 2007.
  10. Jinyoung Jeong & Choongyoul Kang, "The Development of Creativity and Character Education Program Model through Interdisciplinary Integration of Curriculum in the Elementary School," Journal of Learner Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2011.
  11. D. S. Rychen, and L. H. Salganik, "A contribution of the OECD program Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations," INES General Assembly, 2000.
  12. J. Gilbert, "Catching the knowledge wave? The Knowledge society and the future of education in New Zealand," Wellington:New Zealand Council for Educational Research 2005.
  13. M. Chamberlain, "Schools point the way for life of learning," New Zealand Herald, February 2004.
  14. QCA, "The National curriculum: Statutory requirements for key stage 3 and 4," 2007.
  15. ACARA, "The Shape of the Australian curriculum, Version 2.0," Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2010b.
  16. Ministere du I'Education, "Quebec education program - Preschool education, elementary education," 2001.
  17. CDC, "Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculumdevelopmenti," HongKong:Curriculum Development Council, 2001.
  18. Yeongmu Park &Hyeonseok Kang & Insuk Kim & Yeongsik Heo,(Trans), "Integrated Curriculum," Seoul: Wonmisa, 2006.
  19. S. M. Drake, and R. C. Burns, "Meeting standards through integrated curriculum," Alexandria, Va:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2004.
  20. Eun-hee Noh & Hyun-seok Seo. "The Study on Intelgrated Curriculum between Korean Language and Other Subjects," Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, Vol. 45, pp.169-190, 2012.
  21. Jong-Sung Lee, "Delphi method," Seoul: Kyoyookbook, 2006.
  22. C. Okoli, and S. D. Pawlowski, "The Delphi method as a research tool: an example design considerations and applications," Information &Management, 42(1), pp 15-29, 2004.
  23. C. H. Lawshe, "A quantitative approach to content validity," Personael psychology, 28(4), pp.90-94, 1975.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Effectiveness of Smart Education Based on Learning Ability vol.21, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2016.21.9.165
  2. A Study on Development of the Digital Competence Measurement Tool for University Student vol.24, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2019.24.12.191