DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Awareness of class evaluation of dental hygiene students

치위생과 학생들의 강의평가에 관한 인식 조사

  • Kim, Chang-Suk (Department of Dental Hygiene, Ulsan college) ;
  • Cho, Mi-Suk (Departments of Dental Hygiene, Choonhae College of Health Sciences)
  • 김창숙 (울산과학대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 조미숙 (춘해보건대학교 치위생과)
  • Received : 2013.10.22
  • Accepted : 2014.01.21
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of the study is to investigate the awareness and influencing factors of class evaluation in dental hygiene students. This study will establish the measures for educational quality improvement and basic data for effective way of education. Methods : A self-reported questionnaire was filled out by 968 dental hygiene students in Busan, Gyeongnam, and Ulsan from August 26 to September 6, 2013. SPSS 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results : Senior students felt the necessity of class evaluation improvement. In class evaluation items by grade, evaluation entity was the most significant factor. The students answered that teaching sincerity was the most important factor in class evaluation. Conclusions : The students thought that class evaluation depended on the entity and sincerity of the class contents.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee SH. A study for instrument development of course evaluation in the university based upon the theory of instructional design. Journal of Education Technology 2001; 17(1): 81-108.
  2. Kim JH, Park JK, Hong YE. The study of how influences in the environment of college education affects students' lecture evaluation: based on data of Y university. Korea Association of Business Education 2010; 2: 1-16.
  3. A study of undergraduates' perception on evaluation teacher performance in higher education[Master's thesis]. Seoul: Univ. of Ewha Womans, 2011.
  4. Rye CH, Lee JH. A study on instructor factors associated with the student evaluation of teaching at universities. Management Education Review 2005; 9(1): 249-79.
  5. Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness: the stability of mean ratings of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching & Teacher Education 1991; 7(4): 303-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(91)90001-6
  6. Determining criteria and their relative weights for evaluating the instruction in junior colleges[Master's thesis]. Seoul: Univ. of Seoul National, 2003.
  7. Oh EJ. How to improve course evaluation? The Korean Association for Educational Methodology 2009; 21(2) : 1-20.
  8. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Chung C, Siu TL. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Chinese version of the students' evaluations of educational quality instrument. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997; 89(3): 568-72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.568
  9. Han SI, Kim HJ, Lee JH. A comprehensive study of Korean students' evaluations of university teaching. The Journal of Educational Administration 2005; 23(3): 379-403.
  10. Greenwald AG, Grillmore GM. No pain, no gain? the importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997; 89(4): 743-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.743
  11. Feldman KA. Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Research in Higher Education 1983; 18(1): 3-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992080
  12. Ting K. A multi level perspective on student ratings of instruction: lessons from the Chinese experience. Research in Higher Education 2000; 41(5): 637-61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007075516271
  13. Han KS, Choi SH, Park JC. Problems in mandatory course evaluations. Korean Statistical Society 2011; 18(1): 35-45. https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.1.035
  14. Jung YR, Hwang SH, Ahn SY, Sim SH, Han HJ, Choi HS. Efficient teaching behavior in lecture-style instruction of dental hygiene. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2012; 12(1): 189-200. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.1.189
  15. Jung SH, Kim EH, Kim HS. A study on educational environments for students from department of dental hygiene and their satisfaction level with the major in different regions. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2011; 11(1): 69-78.
  16. Park IS, Lee KH. A study on post-admission satisfaction level among dental hygiene students in colleges. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2006; 6(4): 349-59.
  17. Jung JA, Jang YJ. A study on attitude and satisfaction of the students in department of dental hygiene. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2011; 11(5): 649-57.
  18. Han HJ, Yoo EM. Satisfaction of dental hygiene students on general education courses. J Dent Hyg Sci 2010; 10(5): 301-5.
  19. The research of undergraduates' perception on lecture evaluations [Master's thesis]. Seongnam: Univ. of Kyungwon, 2009.
  20. Park JW. Role of college education, tuition and wage scheme: a research on the college reform. Korean Economic and Business association 2013; 31(2): 53-78.
  21. Lee JS. Student ratigs of instruction. Journal of Educational Research & Development 1993; 14(1): 83-95.
  22. Won HH, Seol HS. The validity study for evaluation of the instructional activities questionnaires by students. Journal of Educational Evaluation 2000; 13(2): 55-76.
  23. Kim SS. On reliabilities, validities, and usefulness of instructional evaluation by student ratings. Journal of Student Guidance 1997 ;17: 89-100.
  24. Song MS, Chi EL. The study for the item analysis of instruction evaluation questionnaires. Journal of Educational Evaluation 1994; 7(2): 263-83.
  25. Kim SS, Go EK. Factors that affect satisfaction of education for dental hygiene students. J Dent Hyg Sci 2006; 6(2): 139-45.

Cited by

  1. Related factors to dental fear in some adults vol.14, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.06.881
  2. 일부 고등학생의 치과치료공포감 및 치과의사불신감 관련 요인 분석 vol.8, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2014.8.3.125