DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic and phenotypic relationships of live body measurement traits and carcass traits in crossbred pigs of Korea

  • Received : 2014.06.05
  • Accepted : 2014.08.07
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

This study presents the estimates of heritabilities of body measurement traits and carcass traits, and genetic and phenotypic correlations of those traits for crossbred pigs in Korea. Body and ultrasound (A mode: Piglog 105) measurements in 221 pigs including body weight, length, height and width, three back fat thickness at the points of 4th, 14th rib and chine bone, eye muscle area and lean meat percent were collected at the ages of 70, 145 and 180 days and then slaughtered to measure carcass weight, back fat, belly, collar butt, spare rib, picnic shoulder, hind leg, loin, tenderloin, lean meat yield and intramuscular rough fat content in loin. Genetic analysis was done using a multi-trait animal model. Heritabilties of the body measurements were ranged from 0.331 to 0.559 and three measurements of back fat thickness were also high as range varying from 0.402 to 0.475 for the ages of 145 and 180 days. However, eye muscle area was moderate (0.296) at the age of 180 days. Heritabilities of retail cut yields were also high as ranged from 0.387 to 0.474 and of IMF content in loin was 0.499. Heritabilities of the cut percent traits were ranged from 0.249 to 0.488. Important positive genetic and phenotypic correlations were noted for all carcass yield traits (0.298 to 0.875 and 0.432 to 0.922, respectively). IMF showed low negative genetic correlations with carcass yield traits, such as carcass weight, picnic shoulder, hind leg, loin, tenderloin and lean meat yield whereas low positive genetic correlations with back fat, belly, collar butt and spare rib. Loin, tenderloin and lean meat percent showed negative genetic correlations with carcass weight, back fat thickness, collar butt, spare rib and picnic shoulder percent. The four body measurements at the ages of 70, 145 and 180 days had positive genetic correlations with belly, shoulder butt, spare rib, picnic shoulder and hind leg percent, but negative genetic correlations were shown with loin and tenderloin percent except body measurements at 70 days. The results suggest that carcass yield are negatively correlated with intramuscular fat content, which is a major factor deciding pork quality and the yield of loin and tenderloin are not increased as much as increase in body size. However, the proportions of belly and collar butt are increased with the body size. In conclusion, selection strategy should be designed according to the preference on composition of carcass in each country.

Keywords

References

  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1997). Official Methods of Analysis (16th ed). Arlington, VA, US: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  2. Cho, S., Beomyoung, B., Ngapo, T.M., Kim, J., Dransfield, E., Hwang, I., and Lee, J. 2007. "Effect of meat appearance on south Korean consumers' choice of pork chops determined by image methodology.", Journal of Sensory Studies, 22(1), pp. 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00098.x
  3. Ciobanu, D. C., Lonergan, S. M., and Huff-Lonergan, E. J. 2011. Genetics of Meat Quality and Carcass Traits. In M.F. Rothschild and A. Ruvinsky (Eds.), The Genetics of the Pig (2nd edition,pp355-378). Chippenham, UK: CPI Antony Rowe.
  4. Dransfield, E., Ngapo, T.M., Nielson, A.N., Bredahl, L., Sjoden, P.O., Magnusson,M., Campo,M.M., Nute, G.R. 2005. Consumer choice and suggested price for pork as influenced by its appearance, taste and information concerning country of origin and organic pig production. Meat Sci. 69, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.006
  5. Escriche, N.I., Reixach, J., Lleonart, N., and Noguera., J. L. 2011. Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme. J. Anim. Sci. 89:3881-3889. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3959
  6. Fortomaris, P., Arsenos, G., Georgiadis, M., Banos, G., Stamataris, C., Zygoyiannis, D. 2006. Effect of meat appearance on consumer preferences for pork chops in Greece and Cyprus. Meat Science 72 (4) 688-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.09.019
  7. Hovenier, R., Kanis, E., Van Asseldonk, Westerink, N.G. 1992. Genetic parameters of pig meat quality traits in a halothane negative population. Livest. Prod. Sci. 32, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(92)90002-L
  8. Johnson, Z. B., and Nugent, III, R. A. 2003. Heritability of body length and measures of body density and their relationship to backfat thickness and loin muscle area in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1943-1949. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8181943x
  9. Latorre, M.A., Pomar, C., Faucitano, L., Gariepy, C., and Methot, S. (2008). "The relationship within and between production performance and meat quality characteristics in pigs from three different genetic lines.", Livestock Science, 115(2-3), pp. 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.013
  10. Marja, N., Stalder, K. J., Mote, B. E., Lampe, J., Thorn, B., Rothschild, M. F., Johnson, A. K., Karriker, L. A., and Serenius, T. (2008) "Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations of Body Composition and Structural Soundness Traits in Commercial Gilts," Animal Industry Report: AS 654, ASL R2349. Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ans_air/vol654/iss1/98
  11. Meyer, K. 2010. WOMBAT: A program for mixed model analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. Retrieved from http://didgeridoo.une.edu.au/km/homepage.php.
  12. Newcom, D.W., Baas, T. J., Mabry, J. W. and Goodwi, R. N. 2002. Genetic parameters for pork carcass components. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3099-3106. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80123099x
  13. Ngapo, T.M., Martin, J.F., Dransfield, E. 2007a. International preferences for pork appearance: I. Consumer choices. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.001
  14. Ngapo, T.M., Martin, J.F., Dransfield, E. 2007b. International preferences for pork appearance: II. Factors influencing consumer choice. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.09.007
  15. Salces, A. J., Kang Seok Seo, Cho, K. H., SiDong Kim, S. D. and Lee, Y.C. 2006. Genetic Parameter Estimation of Carcass Traits of Duroc Predicted Using Ultrasound Scanning Modes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci.Vol. 19, No. 10:1379-1383. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1379
  16. Sanchez, J. H., Amills M, Pena RN, Mercade A, Manunza A, Quintanilla R. 2013. Genomic architecture of heritability and genetic correlations for intramuscular and back fat contents in Duroc pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 91:623-632. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5270
  17. Sellier, P. 1998. Genetics of meat and carcass traits. In: Rothschild, M.F., Ruvinsky, A. (Eds.), The Genetics of Pigs. CAB International, New York, pp. 463-510.
  18. Sonesson, A.K., de Greef, K.H., Meuwissen, T.H.E., 1998. Genetic parameters and trends of meat quality, carcass composition and performance traits in two selected lines of large white pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 57, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00163-8
  19. Suzuki, K., Kadowaki, H., Shibata, T., Uchida, H., Nishida, A. 2005. Selection for daily gain, loin-eye area, backfat thickness and intramuscular fat based on desired gains over seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 97: 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.04.007
  20. Tomiyama, M., Oikawa, T., Hoque, M. A., Kanetani, T. and Mori, H. 2009. Influence of early postweaning traits on genetic improvement of meat productivity in purebred Berkshire pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1613-1619. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1214
  21. Vidal, O., Noguera, J. L., Amills, M., Varona, L., Gil, M., Jimenez, N., Davalos, G. and Folch J. M. 2005. Identification of carcass and meat quality quantitative trait loci in a Landrace pig population selected for growth and leanness. J. Anim. Sci. 83:293-300. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.832293x

Cited by

  1. Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig vol.9, pp.1664-8021, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00730
  2. 우리흑돈 종모돈이 삼원교잡종 돼지의 성장, 체형 및 부분육 생산수율에 미치는 영향 vol.21, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.9.432
  3. Maternal effect on body measurement and meat production traits in purebred Duroc pigs vol.138, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12505