Effects of Water or Brine Immersion Thawing Combined with Ultrasound on Quality Attributes of Frozen Pork Loin

Abstract

This study explored the effects of water or brine (2% NaCl, w/v) immersion thawing combined with ultrasound treatment (40 kHz, 150 W) on the quality characteristics of pork. Ultrasound treatment of pork was conducted in two cold media (at $4^{\circ}C$), water and 2% (w/v) brine, respectively. Because the ultrasound treatment caused temperature increase in the media from $4^{\circ}C$ to $16^{\circ}C$, the qualities of pork thawed by ultrasound were compared with those thawed by immersion either in water or brine where the temperature was being maintained at either $4^{\circ}C$ (low temperature control) or $17^{\circ}C$ (high temperature control). The ultrasound treatment resulted in rapid thawing of pork where the thawing rate was similar to those thawed in the $17^{\circ}C$ media. For quality characteristics, ultrasound-treated pork in brine had an advantage of less cooking losses when comparing to the control. In particular, ultrasound treatment in brine exhibited the lowest shear force (or highest tenderness) among the freezing/thawing treatments. Although the ultrasound processing in brine caused discoloration of the pork, this thawing technique had potential to be applied as a commercial thawing technology for frozen foods.

Introduction

Freezing is an effective preservative method for food to maintain quality characteristics for long storage periods. Rapid freezing is advisable to avoid the formation of large ice crystals, which cause tissue damage (De Kock et al., 1995). Although, the quality of frozen foods is related to both the freezing and thawing process, little informa-tion regarding rapid thawing is available (Li and Sun, 2002). Basically, freezing and thawing is a phase transi-tion phenomenon by which heat is removed or added through the surface dimension of food. During freezing, ice is formed on the surface of the food and the water/ice phase change interface shifts inward to the food. In con-trast to freezing, surface ice undergoes a phase transition to water during the thawing process and the phase change interface is toward the inside of the body (Leung et al., 2007). Because thermal diffusivity and thermal conduc-tivity of water is greater than those of ice, thawing usually takes longer than freezing (Carson, 2006; James, 1968). Consequently, rapid thawing is critical to minimize qual-ity loss of frozen foods.

To achieve rapid thawing, some novel technologies have been introduced including infrared thawing, micro-wave thawing, and ohmic thawing (Hong et al., 2007, 2009; Li and Sun, 2002). These thawing techniques are based on the heating process, thus, they have the advan-tage of rapid thawing. However, they also pose difficulties to control overall processing, because of heat focusing, which causes local overheating (Hong et al., 2009). Oper-ating the thawing procedure under cold water or brine is an alternative to avoid local overheating (Hong et al., 2007). Water immersion thawing itself is a traditional thawing method when quick thawing is required. Water immersion thawing is the result of heat convection from a surrounding fluid to the frozen food surface and heat conduction into the body (Leung et al., 2007).

Despite that the application of acoustic waves (fre-quency < 20 kHz) for food thawing has been investigated, it has not attracted much attention because of poor energy efficiency (Li and Sun, 2002). More recently, ultrasound waves (> 20 kHz) have become an interest because of their broad range of applications in particle sizing, cell disrup-tion, degassing, and as a cleanser. It was expected based on these effects that sonication might affect meat tender-ness and shelf-life (Pohlman et al., 1997b). Jayasooriya et al. (2007) demonstrated that high power ultrasound re-duces shear force and hardness of beef. Pohlman et al. (1997a) indicated that ultrasound improves shear proper-ties and decreases beef cooking loss. Although, no trial to use ultrasound as a meat thawing technology has been conducted, the reported impacts of ultrasound on meat qualities compensate for the quality deterioration in meat caused by freezing/thawing.

Ultrasound treatment is conducted in a fluid, generally in water, because the ultrasound characteristics require a medium for energy-propagation (Laugier and Haïat, 2011). It is likely that salinity would affect the efficiency of ultra-sound. Actually, ultrasound thawing could be more effec-tive in brine than water, as the speed of ultrasound is faster in seawater than that in pure water (DelGrosso, 1973; Du-shaw et al., 1993). However, no report is available regar-ding the effect of ultrasound thawing in brine on thawing rate and meat quality. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of water or brine immersion thawing combined with ultrasound on the thawing properties of frozen pork loin.

 

Materials and Methods

Materials

Pork loins, with normal post-rigor pH (5.4-5.7), were randomly selected from six carcasses (3 crossbreed of Landrace × Yorkshir × Duroc, 6 mon old hogs) at 24 h postmortem. The meat was trimmed of all visible fat and connective tissue, and cut into a rectangular form (4×2×6 cm) parallel to the muscle fiber direction. All samples were weighed and a thermocouple (k-type) was inserted into the geometric center of each sample. All samples were wrapped in a polyethylene bag to avoid surface dry-ing during freezing. To minimize the effect of freezing on meat quality, samples were frozen at -50°C for 24 h to provide quick freezing. A fresh control (unfrozen) was maintained at 4°C for the same time as the treatment sam-ples. All chemicals used in the present study were analyt-ical grade.

Fig. 1.Schematic diagram of ultrasonic-thawing device. Water and brine (2% NaCl, w/v) were used as ultrasound-transmitting media.

Thawing procedure

Ultrasound thawing was conducted using the equip-ment depicted in Fig. 1. The frozen meat samples which were removed from the package were connected with an MV 100 mobile corder (Yokogawa Co. Ltd., Japan) and placed into a glass tray filled with 500 mL distilled water or brine (2% NaCl, w/v), which was previously cooled to 4°C. The area outside the tray was filled with 3 L of ice/water to maintain a low temperature during thawing. Ultra-soundwaves were generated using a GLL003 sonicator (SD-Ultrasonic Co. Ltd., Korea) at a frequency of 40 kHz and sonic powerof 150W, and the temperature of the sam-ple and immersion media were monitored. Thawing was finished when sample temperature reached 1°C. Because the ultrasound treatment caused an increase in medium temperature (final, 16°C), some of the frozen samples were thawed by immersion in media maintained at 4°C and 17°C, respectively, without sonication (Table 1).

Table 1.aMedium temperature when thawing was finished. bNot-applied. c2% (w/v) NaCl solution.

Drip loss

After thawing, the meat surface was gently blotted using a tissue, and the meat samples were weighed. Drip loss was calculated in duplicate from the difference in weights before freezing and after thawing, and expressed as a per-centage of the initial weight.

Expressible moisture

Approximately 1 g of thawed meat sample (MMeat) was placed in a centrifuge tube along with gauze as an absor-bent. The samples were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min with a RC-3 automatic refrigerated centrifuge (Sorvall Co., USA) under temperature control at 4°C. The meat pellet was carefully removed, and the tube was weighed (M1). The tube was dried at 102°C for 24 h and weighed again (M2). Expressible moisture was determined in trip-licate and expressed as a percentage of moisture removed from the meat sample:

Cooking loss

The thawed meat samples were weighed and vacuum-packed using a poly-nylon pouch. The meat samples were thermally treated in a water bath maintained at 75°C for 15 min. After cooking, the package was removed, and the meat exudate was blotted using a tissue. The cooked meat was tempered at ambient temperature for 10 min and wei-ghed. Cooking loss was calculated in duplicate based on the difference in weight before and after thermal treat-ment and expressed as percentage loss.

Shear force

The shear force of meat samples was determined using a TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK). After determining cooking loss, the meat was cut into 1×1×4 cm parallel to the fiber direction. The meat strip was sheared by 60 mm/min of crosshead speed using a 1 kg load cell. The maximum force required to shear the sample was corrected and expressed as shear force. The test was repeated at least six times.

Instrumental color

Meat color was determined using a CR-10 color reader (Konica Minolta Sensing Inc., Japan) calibrated with a white standard plate (L*=+97.83, a*=−0.43, b*=+1.98). CIE L*, a*, and b* were determined as indicators of light-ness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. The color was taken from three random places on the meat surface. Total color difference (ΔE) was numerically calculated using the color difference between the treatments and control using the following equation:

Statistical analysis

Means obtained from three entire experiments were analyzed by the general linear model using a SAS version 9.1 software (SAS Institute, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted, and the means were separated by Duncan’s multiple range test when the main effect (thawing method) was significant at the 0.05 level.

 

Results and Discussion

Thawing profile

Time-temperature profiles of pork during thawing are depicted in Fig. 2. The cold water immersion treatment (LW) took 135 min of total thawing time compared to 118 min for the cold brine treatment (LB). As expected, pork thawed in the warm fluid showed quicker thawing, of which thawing times were 14 min and 27 min in brine (HB) and water (HW), respectively. The ultrasound treat-ment thawed the pork as rapidly as immersion in the high temperature medium, and the thawing times were 16 min in brine (SB) and 28 min in water (SW). The thawing rates revealed that applying ultrasound is favorable to thaw meat rapidly. Increasing the power level increases the tem-perature of the transmitting-medium (Chu et al., 2001). As described before, medium temperature increased from 4°C to about 16°C after finishing the ultrasound treatment. Based on the characteristics of sonication, ultrasound wave attenuation is caused by adsorption, which results from converting energy from ultrasound to heat (McClements, 1995). Consequently, the increase in medium temperature by ultrasound treatment accelerated the thawing process of frozen pork. For the comparison of media, brine showed slightly rapid thawing comparing to water. Initially, brine immersion was expected to accelerate thawing because NaCl adsorbed on the meat inside would depress freezing point of water. This phenomenon was clearly observed in the samples thawed in cold-media (LW and LB). Although, sample size adopted in this study was small comparing to commercial fresh meat, ultrasound thawing technique would be effectively applied in the commercial meat thawing because of the clear impact on thawing rate. It is unknown whether ultrasound itself contributed to rapid thawing of pork loin, but it warrants further exploration.

Fig. 2.Time-temperature profiles of pork loin during various thawing procedures.

Water binding properties

All freezing/thawing treatments exhibited less drip loss than that of the control (p<0.05) (Fig. 3A). One of advan-tages of fluid immersion thawing is the minimum mois-ture loss during the thawing process (Hong et al., 2007). Compared to about 5% drip loss in the control, drip loss of the treatments was < 3% or even showed a moisture gain depending on the type of media (water vs. brine). These phenomena were spontaneous because of mass transfer of NaCl and moisture between the fluid and sam-ple. The highest moisture gain was obtained in the LW treatment followed by the SW and the HW (p<0.05). It seemed that the amount of moisture gain was directly related to thawing time during which the meat was kept immersed in the corresponding media. This explanation also corresponded to the results of the brine immersion treatments. Although no difference in drip loss was obser-ved between the LB and SB treatments, the longer the thawing time, the more the drip loss. The lowest drip loss was observed in the HB treatment during brine immer-sion thawing (p<0.05). Rapid thawing minimizes tissue damage caused by ice recrystallization during thawing (Seki and Mazur, 2008). In contrast, sonication appeared to influence the migration of moisture, because the drip loss (or moisture gain) of the ultrasound treated samples-was significantly different from that of samples immersed in high temperature media (p<0.05).

As shown in Fig. 3B, cooking loss in all treatments was higher than that in the control (p<0.05) with the exception of SB of which cooking loss was lower than that of the control (p<0.05). The cooking loss of the treated samples displayed different features based on the type of media. Treatment samples thawed in water always resulted in higher cooking loss than the counterpart thawed in brine (p<0.05). The treatment samples thawed in water had al-ready gained additional moisture during thawing and the moisture was held within the intercellular space. Upon heating, the loosely held moisture in the meat tissue was released, resulting in higher cooking loss. The amount of cooking loss seemed to be related to the amount of NaCl uptake in the case of the brine-immersion treatments. Although the actual NaCl intake was not determined, ultrasound would accelerate diffusion of NaCl as postu-lated by Cárcel et al. (2007) resulting in the lowest cook-ing loss among the brine-immersion treatments.

Fig. 3.Effects of thawing method on the water binding prop-erties of pork loin. Vertical bars indicate standard devia-tions. Means with different superscripts are significantly different (p< 0.05).

Expressible moisture did not differ in any of the treat-ments from that of the control (Fig. 3C). Expressible moisture of the HW treatment was significantly lower than that of LB (p<0.05), but, no overall differences were observed in expressible moisture among treatments. Based on our results, the main factor attributed to water binding properties of frozen pork was the type of medium. Water as a medium caused weight gain during thawing. Nevertheless, the absorbed water in meat was exuded during cooking. Brine enhanced water binding properties of pork by NaCl uptake during thawing, reflecting better attributes of ultrasound treatment of meat in brine.

Fig. 4.Effects of thawing method on the shear force of pork loin. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations. Means with different superscripts are significantly different (p< 0.05).

Shear force

The influence of thawing method on the shear force of pork loin is presented in Fig. 4. In general, frozen/thawed pork tended to show relatively higher shear force com-pared to that of the control. In particular, the shear force of the LW and HW treatments was higher than that of the control (p<0.05). It was likely that water-immersion tha-wing manifested high cooking loss and resulted in a high shear force. Interestingly, the shear force of the SW treat-ment did not differ from that of control despite higher cooking loss. Ultrasound-induced meat tenderization has been reported, although the tenderizing effect varies de-pending on the ultrasonic condition (frequency, intensity, and duration), type of device (bath vs. probe), and animal species (Jayasooriya et al., 2004). Ultrasonic treatment pro-duces cavitation, which affects meat tenderness by degra-ding myofibrillar tissue and connective tissue or activat-ing muscle proteases (Jayasooriya et al., 2004; Mason et al., 2011). Consequently, the lack of a difference in shear force between the control and SW treatment was the result of exposure of the pork lointo ultrasound. The shear force of all brine-immersion type thawing treatments was not different from that of the control. In addition, the SB treat-ment resulted in the lowest shear force among treatments (p<0.05), indicating that applying the SB treatment was advantageous for preventing meat tender-ness caused by freezing/thawing. Besides the ultrasound-induced tenderizing effect, the lowest cooking loss in the SB treatment possibly resulted in the lowest shear force among treat-ments.

Fig. 5.Effects of thawing methods on the colorof pork loin. Vertical bars indicate standard deviations. Means with different super-scripts are significantly different (p< 0.05).

Instrumental color

None of the treatments showed a difference in lightness (L* value) form the control (Fig. 5A). Pork thawed in water had a higher L* value than that thawed in brine (p<0.05) with the exception of the HW and HB treatments in which the L* value was not different. NaCl absorbed on the surface of pork thawed in brine bound water mole-cules tightly and showed a decreased L* value compared to that thawed in water (Baublits et al., 2006). No differ-ence in the L* was observed between HW and HB treat-ments probably due to short thawing time. However, en-hanced NaCl diffusion in the SB treatment caused a light-ness difference between the SW and SB treatments des-pite the short thawing time.

The frozen/thawing treatments resulted in a lower a* value (redness) than that of the control (p<0.05) with the exception of the SW and HB treatments of which the a* value was not different from the control (Fig. 5B). The redness of meat is related to the amount of pigment pro-tein, particularly myoglobin and the chemical state of the myoglobin (Mancini and Hunt, 2005). As a consequence of liquid-immersion, there must be a loss of sarcoplasmic protein as drip, which would be attributed to color changes in pork after thawing. A similar pattern was also obtained for the b* value (Fig. 5C). The b* values of all treatments were lower than that of the control (p<0.05), except the SW treatment.

The total color difference (ΔE) showed a pattern of meat color change as affected by thawing method (Fig. 5D). The color change in pork was mainly affected by type of tha-wing medium. Pork thawed in water did not result in a different ΔE from that of the control, whereas samples thawed in brine had higher ΔE than that of the control (p<0.05). Among brine treatments, LB exhibited the highest ΔE, reflecting that the longer the thawing time, the higher might be the meat color. Reducing the NaCl concentra-tion in brine could minimize the color change caused by drip loss during thawing.

 

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated the advantageous effects of ultrasound as a thawing technology for frozen meat. Although the actual mechanisms involved in ultrasound-mediated rapid thawing warrant further exploration, it en-abled us to thaw pork meat rapidly and minimize quality deterioration caused by ice recrystallization during thaw-ing. Furthermore, brine as an ultrasound transmitting me-dium displayed various benefits for pork qualities com-compared to water, although ultrasound caused a detrimental effect onmeat color. Our results indicate that ultrasound has potential application for commercial thawing of fro-zen food.