Journal of the Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Empirical Analysis on Priority Evaluation of Advanced Urban Transit Systems Considering Weights of Public Transportation System Characteristics

대중교통수단 특성의 중요도를 고려한 신교통시스템 평가 실증분석

  • Kim, Hyunwoong (Green Transport and Logistics Institute, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Moon, Daeseop (Green Transport and Logistics Institute, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Moon, Jungwook (Green Transport and Logistics Institute, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Mirye (Department of Transportation and Logistics System, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jinsun (Department of Transportation and Logistics System, University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2013.10.11
  • Accepted : 2014.02.20
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation method that considers the weights of many characteristics of a public transportation system; this method facilitates the selection of suitable advanced transit system in a transportation investment plan. The method sets up twelve evaluation items separated by the following influence factors: users, community, government and operators. It then evaluates the advanced transportation system by analyzing the weights. For an empirical analysis, the urban advanced transportation systems for the main transit of small and medium sized cities were evaluated using the AHP method. The result revealed that the weight order is safety, rapidity and punctuality, convenience, and regional activation, and the priority order is steel wheel-type AGT, LIM, and rubber wheel-type AGT.

본 논문은 도시형 신교통시스템 도입 계획단계에서 적정 신교통시스템을 용이하게 선정하기 위해 대중교통수단의 다양한 특성들에 대한 중요도를 고려하는 평가기법을 제시하고 있다. 이 기법은 대중교통수단의 특성을 이용자 영향요인, 지역사회 영향요인, 정부 및 운영자 영향요인으로 구분하여 총 12개의 평가항목을 설정하고, 이에 대한 중요도를 분석하여 신교통시스템을 평가하는 기법이다. 실증적 분석을 위해 AHP 기법을 이용하여 중소도시의 간선형 신교통시스템에 대한 가중치를 조사하여 평가를 시행한 결과, 중요도는 안전성, 신속 및 정시성, 편리성, 지역활성화 순으로, 우선순위는 철재차륜 AGT, LIM, 고무차륜 AGT 순으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. J.H. Shin (2005) The optimal mass transit system for new cities, Master thesis, Seoul National University of Technology.
  2. S.W. Ha (2009) A study on selection of light rail system based on multi-attribute utility theory, Master thesis, Hanyang University.
  3. J.K. Kim (2008) A study on the application status and appropriateness of light railway systems-in the Seoul metropolitan area, Master thesis, Hanyang University.
  4. S.J. Park, K.T. Kim, D.J. Lee, S.K. Jang (2012) Selection of advanced transportation mode using the analytic hierarchy process, Proceeding of the 12th Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers Congress, Ansan, pp. 1173-1178.
  5. Y.Y. Kim (2012) Introduction to decision analysis, Myungkyungsa, Seoul, pp. 327-335.
  6. M.L. Manheim (1979) Fundamentals of transportation system analysis, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp. 58-90.
  7. V.R. Vuchic (2005) Urban transit, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 519-551.
  8. J.M. Won (2012) Urban transportation, Pakyoungsa, Seoul, pp. 195-230.
  9. M. Yang, W. Wang, X.W. Chen, W.Y. Li (2006) Decision-making method for mass rapid transit mode selection based on DEA/AHP, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 23(7), pp. 111-115.
  10. P.M. Parajuli, S.C. Wirasinghe (2001) A line haul transit technology selection model, Transportation Planning and Technology, 24(4), pp. 271-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060108717671
  11. H. Kim (2007) Developing guidelines for evaluating and selecting urban rail transit systems, The Korea Transport Institute, Goyang, pp. 108-182.

Cited by

  1. Study on the Prioritization of Improvement Plan for Road Traffic Safety Projects for Business Vehicles by the Introduction of Autonomous Vehicles vol.16, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2017.16.3.01
  2. Characteristic Analysis for Weight Values of Evaluation Items by Traffic Safety Project Type vol.20, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2018.20.1.147