DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cyclic Loading Test for Beam-to-Column Connections of Concrete Encased CFT Column

콘크리트피복충전 각형강관 기둥-보 접합부의 주기하중 실험

  • Received : 2013.08.18
  • Accepted : 2014.02.04
  • Published : 2014.02.27

Abstract

In this study, the beam-to column connections of concrete-encased-and-filled steel tube columns were tested under cyclic loading. Two specimens using steel beams and two specimens using precast concrete beams were tested. The dimension of the column cross section was $670mm{\pm}670mm$. The beam depths were 488mm and 588mm for the steel beams and 700mm for the precast concrete beams. The longitudinal bar ratios of the precast concrete beams were 1.1% and 1.5%. For the connections to the steel beams, continuity plates were used in the tube columns. For the connections to the PC beams, couplers were used for beam re-bar connections. The test results showed that except for a specimen, deformation capacities of the specimens were greater than 4% rotation angle, which is the requirement for the Special Moment Frame. Particularly, specimens using precast concrete beam showed excellent performances in the strength, deformation, and energy dissipation.

본 논문에서는 콘크리트충전 각형강관에 구조용 피복콘크리트를 적용한 합성기둥 접합부의 내진 성능을 평가하였다. 이를 위하여 두 개의 강재 보와 두 개의 프리캐스트 콘크리트 보에 대한 접합부 실험체를 제작하고 반복주기하중실험을 실시하였다. 2/3 축소모델인 기둥 단면은 670mm이고 보춤은 강재보의 경우 488mm, 588mm, PC보의 경우 700mm이다. 강재 보는 보의 춤을 실험 변수로 하였으며 PC보는 보의 휨철근비를 실험 변수로 하였다. 프리캐스트 콘크리트 보의 상부 휨철근비는 1.1%, 1.5%이다. 플랜지는 연속강판을 사용하여 강관과 연결하였으며 휨철근의 정착 및 이음을 위해서는 커플러를 적용한 특수 상세가 사용되었다. 실험결과, 하나의 강재보 실험체를 제외한 모든 실험체는 특수모멘트골조 기준인 4% 이상의 회전각을 발휘하였다. 특히 PC보 실험체는 강도와 변형능력, 에너지 소산에 있어서 우수한 성능을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이호준, 박홍근, 김성배, 박성순(2014) 프리캐스트 콘크리트에 의해 피복된 콘크리트충전 강관기둥의 편심압축실험, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제26권, 제1호, pp.33-44. Lee, H.J., Park, H.G., Kim, S.B., and Park, S.S. (2014) Eccentric Axial Load Test for Concrete-Filled Tubular Columns Encased with Precast Concrete, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.26, No.1, pp.33-44.
  2. Nakamura, Y., Matsuo, A., and Ueura, K. (1999) Ultimate Strength and Plastic Deformation Capacity of CFT Columns with Covering RC Considering Material Combination, Summaries of Technical Reports, AIJ, No.7, pp.39-44 (in Japanese).
  3. Miyauchi, Y., Fukuhara, T., Hiroshige, T., and Muto, K. (2010) Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Covered CFT Structural Elements: Part2. Performance of Steel Beam-Column Joints, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meetings(Structures III), AIJ, pp. 1361-1362 (in Japanese).
  4. ANSI/AISC 341 (2005) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
  5. 임형주, 박홍근, 엄태성, 강수민(2010) 프리캐스트 콘크리트 U형 쉘 공법 보-기둥 접합부의 내진성능, 한국콘크리트학회논문집, 한국콘크리트학회, 제22권, 제6호, pp. 741-751. Im, H.J., Park, H.G., Eom, T.S., and Kang, S.M. (2010) Earthquake Resistance of Beam-Column Connection of Precast Concrete U-Shaped Shell Construction, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, KCI, Vol.22, No.6, pp.741-751 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2010.22.6.741
  6. 대한건축학회(2009) 건축구조설계기준 및 해설(KBC 2009), 기문당. AIK (2009) Korea Building Code and Commentary - Structural, Architectural Institute of Korea (in Korean).
  7. Park, R. (1988) State-of-the-Art Report on Ductility Evaluation from Laboratory and Analytical Testing, Proceedings of 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, Vol.8, pp.605-616.
  8. Architectural Institute of Japan (2008) Recommendations for Design and Construction of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Structures, 2nd ed. (in Japanese).
  9. Fukumoto, T. (2007) Local Elasto-Plastic Behavior of Steel Beam to Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tube Column Moment Connections, J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, No.617, pp.177-184 (in Japanese).

Cited by

  1. 원형단면 멀티기둥 풍력타워 적용 T형 강관조인트 강도 평가 vol.27, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2015.27.1.119
  2. 콘크리트피복 원형충전강관 기둥의 압축성능 vol.27, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2015.27.6.525
  3. Behavior of End Plate Moment Connection with Through Bolts for Concrete Filled Composite Members with Thin-Walled Sections vol.32, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2020.32.6.405