DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diastolic Function in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Evaluation Using the Phase-contrast MRI Measurement of Mitral Valve and Pulmonary Vein Flow Velocities

비대성심근증 환자의 이완기능평가: 승모판과 폐정맥 유속을 측정한 위상차 MRI의 이용

  • Kim, Eun Young (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choe, Yeon Hyeon (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung Mok (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Chol (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Sung-A (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Jae K. (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 김은영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최연현 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김성목 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 이상철 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 순환기내과) ;
  • 장성아 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 순환기내과) ;
  • 오재건 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 순환기내과)
  • Received : 2014.08.25
  • Accepted : 2014.10.01
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: Diastolic dysfunction is a common problem in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The purpose of this study was to assess the role of MRI in the assessment of diastolic function using mitral valve and pulmonary vein flow velocities in HCM patients. Methods and Results: Phase-contrast MRI (mitral valve and pulmonary vein) and transthoracic echocardiography was successfully performed for 59 HCM patients (44 men and 15 women; mean age, 51 years). Forty-nine patients had a diastolic dysfunction; grade 1 (n = 20), grade 2 (n = 27), and grade 3 (n = 2) using echocardiography, and ten patients had normal diastolic function. The transmitral inflow parameters (E, A, and E/A ratios) obtained by MRI showed positive correlation with the same parameters measured by echocardiography (Pearson's r values were 0.47, 0.60, and 0.75 for E, A, E/A, respectively, all P < 0.001). With the flow information of the pulmonary vein from cardiac MRI, pseudo-normalized pattern (n = 8) could be distinguished from true normal filling pattern (n = 17), and the diastolic function grades by cardiac MRI showed moderate agreement with those of echocardiography (kappa value = 0.45, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Assessment of left ventricle diastolic function is feasible using phase-contrast MRI in HCM patients. Analysis of pulmonary vein flow velocity on MRI is useful for differentiating pseudo-normal from normal diastolic function in HCM patients.

배경: 심장의 이완기능 이상은 비대성심근증 환자에서 흔히 발견되는 문제이다. 본 연구는 비대성심근증 환자의 심장 이완기능을 평가하는 데 있어, 승모판과 폐정맥의 유속을 이용한 MRI의 역할을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법과 결과: 승모판과 폐정맥의 유속을 이용한 위상차 MRI와 심초음파검사가 59명 (남:여 = 44:15, 평균 연령 = 51세)의 비대성심근증 환자에서 시행되었다. 49명의 환자가 심초음파검사에서 다양한 정도의 심장 이완기능 이상을 보였다; grade 1 (20명), grade 2 (27명), and grade 3 (2명). MRI로 계산한 승모판 유속인자들 (E, A, E/A ratios)은 심초음파검사로 구한 동일 인자들과 양의 상관관계를 보였다 (Pearson's r values = 0.47, 0.60, 0.75 for E, A, E/A, respectively, all P < 0.001). MRI로 폐정맥 유속정보를 이용하는 경우, pseudo-normalized pattern (8명)이 정상 충만 양상(filling pattern) (17명)과 구분될 수 있었고, 이들을 이용하여 이완기능 정도를 평가를 하는 경우, 심장 MRI가 심초음파검사와 중등도의 일치도를 보였다 (kappa value = 0.45, P < 0.001). 결론: 비대성심근증 환자에서 위상차 MRI를 이용한 심장 이완기능 평가는 임상적으로 적용 가능한 방법이며, 폐정맥 유속 분석을 추가하는 경우, 정상과 pseudo-normal을 구분하는데 유용하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Asao M, et al. Transmitral blood flow reflecting diastolic behavior of the left ventricle in health and disease--a study by pulsed Doppler technique. Jpn Circ J 1982;46:92-102 https://doi.org/10.1253/jcj.46.92
  2. Betocchi S, Bonow RO, Bacharach SL, Rosing DR, Maron BJ, Green MV. Isovolumic relaxation period in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: assessment by radionuclide angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:74-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80262-5
  3. Spirito P, Maron BJ, Bonow RO. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparative analysis of Doppler echocardiographic and radionuclide angiographic techniques. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:518-526 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80461-2
  4. Ikeda H, Maki S, Yoshida N, et al. Predictors of death from congestive heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1280-1283, A9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00075-2
  5. Jensen JL, Williams FE, Beilby BJ, et al. Feasibility of obtaining pulmonary venous flow velocity in cardiac patients using transthoracic pulsed wave Doppler technique. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997;10:60-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(97)80033-8
  6. Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL. New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:865-875 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00345-3
  7. Khouri SJ, Maly GT, Suh DD, Walsh TE. A practical approach to the echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004;17:290-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2003.08.012
  8. Hansen MW, Merchant N. MRI of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: part I, MRI appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189: 1335-1343 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2286
  9. Hartiala JJ, Mostbeck GH, Foster E, et al. Velocity-encoded cine MRI in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: measurement of mitral valve and pulmonary vein flow velocities and flow volume across the mitral valve. Am Heart J 1993;125:1054-1066 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(93)90114-O
  10. Rathi VK, Doyle M, Yamrozik J, et al. Routine evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a practical approach. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-10-36
  11. Rubinshtein R, Glockner JF, Feng D, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging versus Doppler echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:718-723 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.039
  12. Maron BJ, Epstein SE. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a discussion of nomenclature. Am J Cardiol 1979;43:1242-1244 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(79)90160-7
  13. Spirito P, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Epstein SE. Occurrence and significance of progressive left ventricular wall thinning and relative cavity dilatation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:123-129 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(87)90998-2
  14. Tabata T, Thomas JD, Klein AL. Pulmonary venous flow by doppler echocardiography: revisited 12 years later. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1243-1250 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00126-8
  15. Caudron J, Fares J, Bauer F, Dacher JN. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function with cardiac MR imaging. Radiographics 2011;31:239-259 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.311105049
  16. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 2000; 102:1788-1794 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.15.1788
  17. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC Jr, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Rodeheffer RJ. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA 2003;289:194-202 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.2.194
  18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  19. van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH. Quantification in cardiac MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:602-608 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199911)10:5<602::AID-JMRI3>3.0.CO;2-C
  20. Mohiaddin RH. Flow patterns in the dilated ischemic left ventricle studied by MR imaging with velocity vector mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:493-498 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880050503
  21. Westenberg JJ, Doornbos J, Versteegh MI, et al. Accurate quantitation of regurgitant volume with MRI in patients selected for mitral valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:462-466 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.015
  22. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation 2005;111:186-193 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000152819.97857.9D
  23. Perugini E, Rapezzi C, Piva T, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of the myocardial substrate of cardiac amyloidosis by gadolinium cardiac magnetic resonance. Heart 2006;92:343-349
  24. Hansen MW, Merchant N. MRI of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: part 2, Differential diagnosis, risk stratification, and posttreatment MRI appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1344-1352 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2287
  25. Brandts A, Bertini M, van Dijk EJ, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function assessment from three-dimensional threedirectional velocity-encoded MRI with retrospective valve tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:312-319 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22424
  26. Kumar R, Charonko J, Hundley WG, et al. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function using 4-dimensional phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:108-112 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181ffdbaf