References
- Cho, H. J., Yang, I. H., Lee, H. N. & Song, Y. M. (2008). An analysis on the level of evidence used in gifted elementary students' debate. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(5), 495-505.
- Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborn, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Jang, S. H. & Jeong, S. J. (2010). Analysis of elementary students' scientific justification activities based on evidence. Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 414-426.
- Kim, H. K. (2003). Middle school students' open physics inquiry emphasizing peer argumentation: Its conditions, features, and roles. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
- Kim, H. K. & Song, J. W. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
- Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), Emergence of mathematical meaning. NJ: Sawrence Erlbaum.
- Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Havard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-178.
- Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. New Jersey: Ablex.
- Lim, J. K., Song, Y. M., Song, M. S. & Yang, I. H. (2010). An analysis on the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation in scientific inquiry. Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 441-450.
- Ministry of Education (2009). 2009 Revised Korean national science curriculum. (2009-41).
- National Reserch Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Newton, P., Driver, P. & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Jounal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
- Park, Y. S. (2006). Theoretical study on the opportunity of scientific argumentation for implementing authentic scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 401-415.
- Perella, J. (1987). The debate method of critical thinking: An introduction to argumentation. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
- Siegel, M. A. (2006). High school students' decision making about substantiality. Environmental Education Research, 12(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600689003
- Simon, S. & Maloney, J. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600855419
- Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy, 87, 399-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026735
- Wee, S. M., Cho, H. J., Kim, S. H. & Lee, H. N. (2009). The analysis of the level of the argumentation of small group according to the students' characteristics. Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2009.33.1.1
- Yang, I. H., Lee, H. J., Lee, H. N. & Cho, H. J. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(2), 203-220.
Cited by
- 모순 완화하기 -다양한 과학 수업 방법 사용을 위한 초등 담임교사들의 협력- vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.2.307
- 초등학교 과학 수업에서 과학영재 학생의 행동 특성이 일반 학생에게 미치는 영향에 대한 교사의 인식 vol.39, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.353