DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Model for Predicting Management Costs of the Multiple Prime Contract

분리발주 방식의 관리비용 예측 모델

  • Kim, Kihyun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Kyungrai (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Wansoo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Lee, Eunjae (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Hwang, Youngkyu (Department of Architectural and Interior Design, Kyeonggi College of Science and Technology)
  • 김기현 (아주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김경래 (아주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 박완수 (아주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 이은재 (아주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 황영규 (경기과학기술대학교 건축인테리어과)
  • Received : 2013.12.03
  • Accepted : 2014.01.06
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

On March, 2013, the Government announced the Multiple Prime Contract method will be expanded in public building construction projects. The applying multiple prime contract method has been immersing issue among all stakeholders of construction project. The owner conducts the role of a general contactor as well as owner's original responsibility while construction works being executed by specialty contractors. If the owner has not experience of project management, it should be bring about increasing management cost due to the interface problems among prime contractors. With this reason, it is difficult to administrate the multiple prime contract. So far there has been no methodology of predicting management cost in the multiple prime contract. Therefore, this study aims to enable the operation of efficient multiple prime contracts by developing a model to predict their management costs.

2013년 3월 정부에서는 공공공사에 분리발주방식을 확대적용하는 정책을 발표하였다. 분리발주방식의 도입을 두고 건설참여자들의 입장이 첨예하게 대립하게 되고, 건설분야의 뜨거운 이슈가 되고 있는 상황이다. 건설공사 관리의 경험이 부족한 공공발주자가 다수로 분리된 전문공종들을 직접관리하여 인터페이스의 증가에 따른 관리비용 상승, 실적 부족으로 인한 관리비용 산정 기준이 없어 사업운영에 어려움이 있는 현실이다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 분리발주의 관리비용율 예측할 수 있는 모델을 개발하여 효율적인 분리발주의 운영이 가능하게 하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashenfelter, O. Ashmore, D. and Filer, R. (1997). "Contract Form and Procurement Costs: The Impact of Compulsory Multiple Contractor Laws in Construction", NBER Working Paper No.5916, NBER.
  2. Becker, B. (1993). "Single vs. Sepratate Bidding", The Electrical Contracting Foundation and The Mechanical Contracting Foundation, Bethesda, Md.
  3. Becker, B. (1995). "Single vs. Separate Prime Contracting: A National Study, The Electrical Contracting Foundation and The Mechanical Contracting Foundation, Bethesda, Md.
  4. Chang, Chulki (2013). "Efficient Application of Multi-Trade Contract Method to Public Construction Project.", Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 14(2), pp. 35-44.
  5. Eddy M. Rojas (2008), "Single versus Multiple Prime Contracting", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10). pp. 758-765. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(758)
  6. Holland, W. (2002), "State's Construction Contracting Methods", State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General, Springfield, Ill.
  7. Jung, Y., Woo, S., Park, J., Kang, S., Lee, Y., and Lee, B. (2004). "Evaluation of the Owner's CM Functions", Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 5(3), pp. 128-136.
  8. Jung, Y. and Gibson, G. E. (1999), "Planning for Computer Integrated Construction", Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(4). pp. 217-225.
  9. Lee, Boknam (2010), "Diagnostic issues and Solutions of CM in 2010", Technology and Trends in Construction Engineering and Management, 11(2), KICEM. pp. 56-59.