DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Gustatory Function in Patients with Sleep Disordered Breathing

  • Ahn, Jong-Mo (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Bae, Kook-Jin (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Yoon, Chang-Lyuk (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Ryu, Ji-Won (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2014.01.13
  • Accepted : 2014.02.04
  • Published : 2014.03.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the difference between gustatory functions in a sleep disordered breathing (SDB) group and a control group. The pathogenesis of SDB has not been fully understood. Though the precise contributions of neuromuscular and anatomical factors on SDB pathogenesis are still debated, we hypothesized that the gustatory dysfunction could be predisposed to SDB. Methods: All patients were diagnosed as SDB by polysomnography (PSG). On the basis of PSG results, patients were divided into 3 groups: snoring, mixed, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The control group comprised healthy volunteers who were the same age as those of the SDB group and whose breathing was verified as normal using a portable sleep monitor device. The patient group and the control group were evaluated for gustatory functions with an electrogustometry (EGM). The electrical taste thresholds were measured in the anterior, midlateral, and posterior sides of the tongue and soft palatal regions, both sides. To find out the difference in EGM scores, statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-wallis and Mann-Whitney U test with 95% confidence interval and p<0.05 significance level. Results: The patients with SDB had higher EGM scores than the control group at all spots tested, except for the right midlateral of the tongue, and there was a statistical significance in the comparison between the control group and the divided SDB groups, respectively. Among the divided SDB groups, the snoring group had the most significant differences in the number of the measured spots, but there was no difference among the snoring, mixed, and OSA groups. Conclusions: These results may suggest that neurologic alterations with sleep disordered breathing could be associated with gustatory dysfunction. In the future, further systemic studies will be needed to confirm this study.

Keywords

References

  1. Panossian L, Daley J. Sleep-disordered breathing. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013;19:86-103.
  2. Sunnergren O, Brostrom A, Svanborg E. Soft palate sensory neuropathy in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope 2011;121:451-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21371
  3. Kimoff RJ, Sforza E, Champagne V, Ofiara L, Gendron D. Upper airway sensation in snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:250-255. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2010012
  4. Guilleminault C, Li K, Chen NH, Poyares D. Two-point palatal discrimination in patients with upper airway resistance syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and normal control subjects. Chest 2002;122:866-870. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.3.866
  5. Nguyen AT, Jobin V, Payne R, Beauregard J, Naor N, Kimoff RJ. Laryngeal and velopharyngeal sensory impairment in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 2005;28:585-593.
  6. Li HY, Lee LA, Wang PC, et al. Taste disturbance after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:985-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.02.034
  7. Eun YG, Shin SY, Byun JY, Kim MG, Lee KH, Kim SW. Gustatory function after radiofrequency tongue base reduction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:853-857. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811413680
  8. Enoz M. Was there evidence of pre-existing taste disturbance in the five patients with postoperative abnormality? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:176, author reply 176.
  9. Flemons WW. Clinical practice. Obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2002;347:498-504. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp012849
  10. Tsai YJ, Ramar K, Liang YJ, et al. Peripheral neuropathology of the upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep Med Rev 2013;17:161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2012.05.005
  11. Jung JK, Hur YK, Choi JK. The effect of mandibular protrusion on dynamic changes in oropharyngeal caliber. Korean J Oral Med 2010;35:193-202.
  12. Patil SP, Schneider H, Marx JJ, Gladmon E, Schwartz AR, Smith PL. Neuromechanical control of upper airway patency during sleep. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007;102:547-556. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00282.2006
  13. Matsumoto I. Gustatory neural pathways revealed by genetic tracing from taste receptor cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2013;77:1359-1362. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.130117
  14. Tomita H, Ikeda M. Clinical use of electrogustometry: strengths and limitations. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2002;(546):27-38.
  15. Stillman JA, Morton RP, Hay KD, Ahmad Z, Goldsmith D. Electrogustometry: strengths, weaknesses, and clinical evidence of stimulus boundaries. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:406-410. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00729.x
  16. Lobb B, Elliffe DM, Stillman JA. Reliability of electrogustometry for the estimation of taste thresholds. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000;25:531-534. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00392.x
  17. Lugaresi E, Plazzi G. Heavy snorer disease: from snoring to the sleep apnea syndrome--an overview. Respiration 1997;64(Suppl 1):11-14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000196730