한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제47권5호
  • /
  • Pages.411-420
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지속가능성지수를 이용한 다목적댐의 용수공급 이행도 평가

Water Supply Performance Assessment of Multipurpose Dams Using Sustainability Index

  • 투고 : 2014.03.04
  • 심사 : 2014.03.26
  • 발행 : 2014.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

지구온난화와 기후변화에 의한 수문사상의 불확실성이 커지고 있는 점을 고려하여 수자원의 지속가능성은 매우 중요한 과제로 대두되고 있다. 본 연구는 우리나라 주요 다목적댐을 대상으로 지속가능성지수를 이용하여 용수공급 이행도를 평가하였다. 수자원시스템 용수공급 평가에 많이 활용되고 있는 지표들을 대상으로 적용성과 유연성을 고려하여 선정하고, 선정된 매개변수로 구성된 복합지수를 이용하여 통합적으로 평가하는 방식이다. 실질적으로 신뢰도, 회복도, 취약도 및 최대물부족도 등을 기초 매개변수로 댐의 용수공급 지속가능성지수를 구성하고 15개 다목적댐을 대상으로 개별 댐과 유역별로 평가하였다. 평과결과, 금강유역의 대청댐과 낙동강 유역의 임하, 합천 및 남강댐이 취약한 것으로 나타났으며, 유역은 낙동강 유역이 가장 취약하여 용수공급 안전도 향상을 위한 대응방안이 필요한 것으로 분석되었다.

The water resources sustainability is becoming an important issue in consideration of hydrologic uncertainty by global warming and climate change. This study is to assess the water supply performance for the major multipurpose dams using sustainability index. Parameters, mostly utilized in water resources system assessment, are selected in respect of applicability and flexibility, and those parameters are used as a variable of the composite index. In practice, the composite index including reliability, resiliency, vulnerability and maximum deficit are applied to 15 multipurpose dams and 4 major basins. And to conclude, Daechungdam in the Geum river basin and Imhadam, Hapchondam and Namgangdam in the Nakdong river basin show low sustainability comparing with other dams. The Nakdong river basin needs to develop alternatives to improve water supply stability because it indicates the most poor sustainability level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cai, X., MacKinney, D.C., and Lasdon, L.S. (2002). "A framework for sustainability analysis in water resources management application to the Syr Darya basin."Water Resources Research, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1085-1098.
  2. Chaves, H.M.L., and Alipaz, S. (2007). "An Integrated Indicator Based on Basin Hydrology, Environment, Life, and Policy: The Watershed Sustainability Index." Water Resources Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 883-895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9107-2
  3. Hashimoto, T., Stcdinger, J.R., and Loucks, D.P. (1982). "Reliability, Resiliency, and Vulnerability Criteria For Water Resource System Performance Evaluation." Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i001p00014
  4. HEC. (Hydrologic Engineering Center). (1975). Hydrologic engineering methods for water resources development: Vol. 8, Reservoir Yield. US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, Calif.
  5. Jinno, K., Zongxue, X., Kawamura, A., and Tajiri, K. (1995). "Risk assessment of a water supply system during drought."Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629550042399
  6. JWRDPC. (Japan Water Resources Development Public Corporation). (1977). Drought Assessment. Mizu To Tomoni, No. 159, Tokyo, Japan.
  7. Juwana, I., Perera, B., and Muttil, N. (2010). "A water sustainability index for West Java-Part 2: refining the conceptual framework using Delphi technique." Water science and technology. Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, Vol. 62, No. 7, pp. 1641-1652. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.453
  8. Lee, G.M., and Yi, J. (2012). "Analysis of Emergency Water Supply Effects of Multipurpose Dams using Water Shortage Index." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 1143-1156. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.11.1143
  9. Loucks, D.P. (1997). "Quantifying trends in system sustainability." Hydrological Science Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 513-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669709492051
  10. Loucks, D.P., Stakhiv, E.Z., and Martin, L.R. (2000). "Sustainable water resources management." Journal ofWater Resources Panning and Management, Vol. 126, No. 2, pp. 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:2(43)
  11. Loucks, D.P., and van Beek, E. (2005). Water Resources Systems Planning and Management, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris.
  12. McMahon, T.A., Adeloye, A.J., and Zhou, S.L. (2006). "Understanding performance measures of reservoirs." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 324, pp. 359-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.030
  13. Mendoza, V.M., Villanuave, E.E., and Adem, J. (1997). "Vulnerability of basins and watersheds in Mexico to global climate change." Climate Research, Vol. 9, pp. 139-145. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr009139
  14. Moy, W.-S., Cohon, J.L., and ReVelle, C. (1986). "A programming model for analysis of the reliability, resilience and vulnerability of a water supply reservoir." Water Resources Research, Vol. 22, pp. 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR022i004p00489
  15. Policy Research Initiative. (2007). Canadian Water Sustainability Index Retrieved 5 July 2007, from http://policyresearch.gc.ca/doclib/SD_PR_CWSI_web_e.pdf.
  16. Sandobal-Solis, S., MaKinney, D.C., and Loucks, D.P. (2011). "Sustainability Index for Water Resources Planning and Management." Journal ofWater Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 137, No. 5, pp. 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000134
  17. Sullivan, C. (2002). "Calculating a Water Poverty Index." World Development, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 1195-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9
  18. Vogel, R.M., and Bolognese, R.A. (1995). "Storagereliability- resilience-yield relation for over-year water supply systems."Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 645-654. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02972
  19. Zongxue, X., Jinno, K., Kawanura, A., Takesaki, S., and Ito, K. (1998). "Performance risk analysis for Fukuoka watersupply system."Water Resources Management, Vol. 12, pp. 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007951806144

피인용 문헌

  1. Improving Reservoir Operation Criteria to Stabilize Water Supplies in a Multipurpose Dam: Focused on Nakdong River Basin in Korea vol.10, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091236
  2. Development and Effective Analysis of Termination Criteria at Each Drought Response Stage in a Multipurpose Dam vol.18, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.5.23