DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Typology of Social Insurance Policy Instruments in Korea

우리나라 사회보험 정책수단의 유형에 관한 연구

  • Noh, Shi-Pyung (Department of public human resources, Seokyeong University)
  • 노시평 (서경대학교 공공인적자원학부)
  • Received : 2014.05.14
  • Accepted : 2014.05.19
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

This study tries to find the policy instruments that have used in the process of social insurance policy implementation. The results can be summarized as follows: First, in case of compulsory policy instrument, the government uses the regulation, public enterprise and government insurance in the process of implementing of all the social insurance policy. Second, in the case of mixed policy instrument, the government use the user' contribution in the process of implementing of all the social insurance policy but the subsidy was used in the process of implementing of the medical, pension, unemployment and long-term care insurance for the aged policy. Also, the information and discipline was used in the process of implementing of unemployment insurance policy and the partnership was used in the process of implementing of long-term care insurance for the aged policy. Third, in case of voluntary policy instrument, the government uses the family and community in the process of implementing of almost the whole social insurance policy.

본 연구는 우리나라 사회보험정책의 집행에 활용된 정책수단의 유형을 규명하기 위한 논문이다. 본 연구를 위해 지금까지 학자들에 의해서 연구된 정책수단의 개념 및 유형에 대해 살펴보았다. 이를 근거로 해서 우리나라 사회보험정책의 집행에 활용된 정책수단들의 유형을 강요적 혼합적 자발적 정책수단으로 분류하여 탐색해 보았다. 연구결과 밝혀진 사실은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 강요적 정책수단의 경우 정부보험, 공기업, 규제라는 정책수단이 모든 사회보험정책 집행과정에서 활용되었다. 둘째, 혼합된 정책수단의 경우는 강요적 정책수단의 경우와는 다른 특성을 보여주고 있다. 먼저 5대 사회보험정책 모두 사용자 부담금이라는 정책수단이 활용되고 있으나, 보조금의 경우에는 건강보험, 연금보험, 고용보험, 노인장기요양보험에서 사용되고 있다. 이러한 정책수단 외에 정보와 훈계라는 정책수단은 고용보험정책에서, 파트너십은 노인장기요양보험정책에서 활용되고 있다. 셋째, 자발적 정책수단으로는 가족과 공동체라는 정책수단이 대부분의 사회보험정책에서 활용되고 있다. 다만 산재보험정책은 공동체라는 수단만이 중요한 정책수단으로 활용되고 있는 특성을 보이고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Salamon, Lester M. "Rethinking Public Management: Third Party Government and the Tools of Government Action", Public policy. Vol.29, No.1. pp. 255-279. 1981.
  2. Landry, R. and Varone, F. "Choice of Policy Instruments: Confronting the Deductive and the Interactive Approaches", In Eliads, P. Hill, M. and Howlett, M. (ed.), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, McGil-Queen's University Press. pp. 106-8. 2005.
  3. Linder, S. and Peters, G. "The Study of Policy Instruments: Four School of Thought", In Peters, G. and Van Nispen F. (ed.), Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, Edward Elgar. 1998.
  4. Elmore, R. "Instruments and Strategy in Public Policy", Policy Studies Review, Vol.7, No.1. pp.164-186. 1987.
  5. Howlett, Michael & Ramesh, M. "Studying Public Policy", Oxford University Press. 1995.
  6. Young Han Chun.Kyung Hee Lee. "Research on Policy Instruements: Origen, Development and Future", Korean Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 48. No. 2. pp. 91-117. 2010.
  7. Howlett, Michael. "What is a Policy Instrument? Policy Tools, Policy Mixes, and Policy Implementation Styles". In Eliads, P. Hill, M. and Howlett, M. (ed.), Designing Government: Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, McGil-Queen's University Press. p31. 2005.
  8. Vedung, Evert. "Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. In Marie-Louise, Bemelmans-Videc, Ray, C. Rist, Vedung Evert (ed.), Carrot, Stick and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, New Burnswick, p.21. 1998.
  9. Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M. Studying Public Policy. Oxford University Press. p. 80. 1995.
  10. Salamon, Lester M. "Economic Regulation", In Salamon Lester M.(ed.), The Tool of Government: A Guide to the New Governance", Oxford University Press. p. 19. 2002.
  11. Young Han Chun.Kyung Hee Lee. "Research on Policy Instruements: Origen, Development and Future", Korean Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 48. No. 2. p. 96. 2010.
  12. Hood, C. "The Tools of Government", Chatham House. 1986.
  13. Salamon, Lester M. "Economic Regulation", In Salamon Lester M.(ed.), The Tool of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford University Press. p. 21. 2002.
  14. McDonnel, L. M. and Elmore R. F. "Alternative Policy Instruments". Center for Policy Research in Education. pp. 7-12. 1987.
  15. Vedung, Evert. "Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. In Marie-Louise, Bemelmans-Videc, Ray, C. Rist, Vedung Evert (ed.), Carrot, Stick and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, New Burnswick, pp. 21-57. 1998.
  16. Howlett, Michael & Ramesh, M. "Studying Public Policy", Oxford University Press. pp. 85-101. 1995.
  17. Young Han Chun. "Research on Policy: Origins, Development, and Futures", Journal of Government Studies. Vol. 13. No. 2. pp. 39-51. 2007.
  18. Myung Jye Moon. "Theoretical Coordinate and Issue of Policy Instrument Study", Policy & Knowledge. Vol. 373. pp. 2-24. 2008.
  19. Wha Joon Noh, "Introduction to the Public Policy", Park Young Co. 2012.
  20. Salamon, Lester M. "Economic Regulation", In Salamon Lester M.(ed.), The Tool of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford University Press. 2002.
  21. Hood, C. "The Tools of Government", Chatham House. 1986.
  22. Howlett, Michael & Ramesh, M. "Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems", 2nd edition. Oxford University Press. 2003.
  23. Young Han Chun.Kyung Hee Lee. "Research on Policy Instruements: Origen, Development and Future", Korean Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 48, No. 2. p.98. 2010.