DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison Study on the Importance and Problems of Assessment Items of the G-SEED System

G-SEED 평가항목별 중요도 및 문제점 비교연구

  • Received : 2014.01.20
  • Accepted : 2014.02.10
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

The Green growth has been demanded in all industrial sectors due to environmental destruction and exhaustion of natural resources. Buildings have consumed 1/3 of the total energy and 40% of natural resources and have accounted for 50% of $CO_2$ emissions and 30-50% of waste materials. In 1991, BREEAM(Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) of the British BRE(Building Research Establishment) had begun reduction of $CO_2$ emissions and energy saving movements, in which all the countries around the world have participated. The Republic of Korea has taken part in this trend by declaring a "National Vision in the Green Growth" in 2008 and implementing regulations on "Low Carbon, Green Growth" in 2010. G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) based on GBCS(Green Building Certification System) has been actively promoted for its application. This study has limited its scope to G-SEED office buildings. It has conducted surveys of problems and assessment items of the G-SEED identified in the preceding study by the AHP(Analytic hierarchy process) method. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparison analysis of problems and ranking of evaluation items recognized in the survey and to be presented as reference materials for G-SEED system improvements at its next amendments.

Keywords

References

  1. 김창성, 김경아, "국내 친환경 건축물 인증 제도의 유지관리 부문 개선 방안", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 2011년 10월, 제11권 5호 / (Kim, C.S., Kim, K.A., Study on Improvement of Korea Green Building Certification Criteria by Assessing the Maintenance Categories, The Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture And Environment; 2011.10, 11(5))
  2. 김현아, 김광현, "업무용 친환경건축물 인증기준의 개선방향에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 논문집, 2013년 10월, 제29권 제10호 / (Kim, H.A., Kim, K.H., A Study on the Direction of Revision for Green Building Certification Criteria on Office Building-Focused on the Comparison with LEED and BREEAM, Architectural Institute of Korea; 2013.10, 29(10))
  3. 안선주, 송상훈, "공동주택 관련 인증제도 간 상호 인정 반안", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 2011년 4월, 11권 2호 / (Ahn, S.J., Song, S., H., Mutual Accreditation of Certification System for Apartment Housing, The Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture And Environment; 2011.04, 11(2))
  4. 유정연, 조동우, 채장우, "국내외 친환경건축물 인증제도 비교분석 연구", 한국생태환경건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집, 2006년, 제6권 제1호 / (Yu, J.Y., Cho, D.W., Chae, C.U., A Study on Comparing and Analyzing Domestic and Foreign Green Building Certification Criteria, The Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture And Environment: 2006)
  5. 이상춘, 최영준, 최율, "AHP 방법을 이용한 노후학교 에너지절감을 위한 요소기술의 우선순위 결정", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 2011년 12월, 제11권 6호 / (Lhee, S.C., Choi, Y.J., Choi, Y., Determining the Priority of Factor for Reducing Energy at Deteriorated School Building Using AHP Method, The Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture And Environment; 2011.12, 11(6))
  6. 이성옥, 조동우, 박철용, 이상호, "해외 친환경건축물 인증제도와 국내 녹색건축 인증제도의 등급 인증을 위한 평가점수 산출방법 비교 분석 연구", 대한건축학회 논문집, 2013년 11월, 제29권 제11호 / (Lee, S.O., Cho, D.W., Park, C.Y., Lee, S.H., A Study on Score Calculation Method for Certification Grade of G-SEED & World Green Building Rating System, Architectural Institute of Korea; 2013.11, 29(11))
  7. 이태경, "친환경건축물 인증시스템의 가중치 부여방법에 관한 연구", 경북대학교 박사학위논문, 2009년 12월 / (Lee, T.K., Weight Rating System for Green Building Certification Criteria, Paper of Dr. degree in Kyungpook Univ, 2009.12
  8. Saaty, Thomas, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 1980

Cited by

  1. Improvement Directions for the G-SEED System from the Resident's Perspective - Focused on Certification Assessment Criteria for Apartment Buildings - vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.4.019