DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Motor Imagery Practice in Conjunction with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Stroke Patients

  • Ji, Sang-Goo (Department of Physical Therapy, Eulji University Hospital) ;
  • Cha, Hyun-Gyu (Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungbuk College) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Jong (Department of Physical Therapy, Dong-shin University) ;
  • Kim, Myoung-Kwon (Department of Physical Therapy, Young-San University)
  • Received : 2014.03.28
  • Accepted : 2014.04.17
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine whether motor imagery (MI) practice in conjunction with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to stroke patients could improve theirgait ability. This study was conducted with 29 subjects diagnosed with hemiparesis due to stroke.The experimental group consisted of 15 members who were performed MI practice in conjunction with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, while the control group consisted of 14 members who were performed MI practice and sham therapy. Both groups received traditional physical therapy for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks; additionally, they received mental practice for 15 minutes. The experimental group was instructed to perform rTMS and the control group was instructed to apply sham stimulation for 15 minutes. Gait analysis was performed using a three-dimensional motion capture system, which is a real-time tracking device that delivers data via infrared reflective markers using six cameras. Results showed that the velocity, step length, and cadence of both groups were significantly improved after the practice (p<0.05). Significant differences were found between the groups in velocity and cadence (p<0.05) as well as with respect to the change rate (p<0.05) after practice. The results showed that MI practice in conjunction with rTMS is more effective in improving gait ability than MI practice alone.

Keywords

References

  1. S. J. Olney and C. L. Richards, Gait Posture 4,136 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(96)01063-6
  2. P. M. Davies, Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 235 (2000).
  3. R. Dickstein, A. Dunsky, and E. Marcovitz, Phys. Ther. 84, 1167 (2004).
  4. M. S. Boschker, F. C. Bakker, and M. B. Rietberg, J. Sports Sci. 18, 593 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050082305
  5. S. M. Kosslyn, G. Ganis, and W. L. Thompson, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 635 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35090055
  6. R. N. Lemon, R. S. Johansson, and G. Westling, J. Neurosci 15, 6145 (1995).
  7. D. Burke, R. Hicks, S. C. Gandevia, J. Stephen, I. Woodforth, and M. Crawford, J. Physiol. 470, 383 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019864
  8. T. Drew, J. Neurophysiol. 70, 179 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.179
  9. A. Pascual-Leone, J. M. Tormos, J. Keenan, F. Tarazona, C. Canete, and M. D. Catala, J. Clin. Nerophysiol. 15, 333 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005
  10. G. Pennisi, G. Alagona, G. Rapisarda, F. Nicoletti, E. Costanzo, R. Ferri, M. Malaquarnera, and R. Bella, Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 1536 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00255-9
  11. E. M. Khedr, H. M. Farweez, and H. Islam, Eur. J. 10, 567 (2003).
  12. Y. R. Yang, C. Y. Tseng, S. Y. Chiou, K. K. Liao, S. J. Cheng, K. L. Lai, and R. Y. Wang, Neurorehabil. 27, 79 (2013).
  13. F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, and S. Belleville, 14th Inter Cong World Confed Phys. Ther. June 7 (2003).

Cited by

  1. Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Walking and Balance Function after Stroke vol.97, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000948
  2. Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with other therapies improves gait speed after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis pp.1945-5119, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2019.1565696