한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.235-246
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학교사들의 2009 개정 교육과정 융합형 '과학' 수용에 관한 인과 모델 연구

The Study of Causal Model on Science Teachers' Adoption of 'Science' Focusing on the Fusion in the 2009 Revised Curriculum

  • 투고 : 2014.02.03
  • 심사 : 2014.05.19
  • 발행 : 2014.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 혁신 수용 모델을 바탕으로 융합형 '과학'교과가 현장교사들에 의하여 어떻게 수용되는지에 관한 연구이다. 이 연구를 위해서 선행연구를 바탕으로 필요성 인식, 지원에 대한 인식, 개인의 혁신성, 인지된 유용성, 교수 효능감, 수용의도의 6가지 요인을 추출하였고, 관련 검사 문항을 개발하였다. 혁신 수용에 관한 선행 연구를 바탕으로 6가지 요인의 가설적 모델 역시 제안되었다. 전국 349명의 과학교사들이 설문조사에 참여하였다. 연구 결과 '과학' 교과에 대한 혁신 수용에 관련된 인식의 수준은 교사의 연수 유무, 교사 경력, 전공과 유의미한 상관관계가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 혁신 수용에 관한 선행연구를 통해 제안된 모델은 과학교사들의 '과학'교과를 수용하는 과정을 설명하는데 타당한 모델로 확인되었다. 지원에 대한 인식, 인지된 유용성, 교수 효능감은 다른 변인간 관계에서 높은 수준의 매개 효과를 보였다. 이와 같은 새롭게 개발된 교육과정, 교과서, 교육 정책이 학교 현장에서 성공적으로 뿌리내리기 위해서는 교사들의 수용 의도를 향상시킬 필요가 있다. 이 연구 결과는 교사들의 수용 태도를 향상시키는 프로그램 개발에 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

This study aims to explore how in-service science teachers adopt newly developed 'Science' focusing on the fusion of science based on 'the diffusion of innovation' model. For this study, we have explored five variables (i.e., perception of need, perception of support, innovativeness, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy of teaching, and intention to adopt) based on literature review and developed survey items to measure the level of five variables that in-service science teachers perceive. In addition, the path model of six variables explaining how in-service science teachers adopt an innovation was hypothesized by the literature review. A total of 349 in-service science teachers have participated in this survey study. First of all, results have illustrated that the levels of six variables have not significantly associated with in-service science teachers' teaching experiences, participation in professional development programs on 'Science' curriculum, and majors. In addition, the statistically acceptable model fit indices have illustrated that path model has been statistically valid to explain how in-service science teachers adopt newly developed 'Science' focusing on the fusion of science. The results have also illustrated that 'perception of support', 'perceived usefulness', and 'self-efficacy of teaching' exhibited strong mediating effects between other variables. For the successful establishment of newly developed curricula, textbook, or policies in science education in school, the level of teachers' intention to adopt innovations should be enhanced. This study will be useful for the development of new science teacher professional development programs to promote the level of teachers' intention to adopt innovations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agarwal, R., & Karahana, E. (2000). Cognitive absorption and belief about information technology usage. Management Information Science Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
  2. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Anderson, T., Varnhagen, S., & Campbell, K. (1998). Faculty adoption of teaching and learning technologies: Concentrating earlier adopters and mainstream faculty. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 2(3), 71-98.
  5. Armstrong, D., & Guidera, J. (2002). Lobbying campaign could determine fate of a hyped scooter. The Wall Street Journal, A1, A6.
  6. Ban, H., & Min, I. C. (2007). An exploratory study of the characteristics of UCC producers, users and non-users: From the view of innovation diffusion theory. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 51(4), 407-484.
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  8. Beggs, T. A. (2000). Influences and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. Proceeding of the Mid-south Instructional Technology Conference, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 446-746.
  9. Cho, B. K., & Seo, S. Y. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs of kindergarten science teachers. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 22(2), 361-373.
  10. Cho, K. L., & Jo, S. Y. (2012). A study on the diffusion and adoption of e-learning among elementary school teachers: Based on Rogers' theory of diffusion of innovation. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 409-438.
  11. Chung, J. S., & Oh, W. (2011). Physics concepts in integrated science for 10th grade in 2009 national curriculum. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 61(12), 1091-1097. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.61.1091
  12. Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20 (4), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785979
  13. Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: A diffusion study. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
  14. Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction - A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100107
  15. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393031
  16. David, P. A. (1986). Clio and the economy of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
  17. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Science Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  18. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: Comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  19. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching difficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
  20. Figg, C. B. (2000). Relationships between selected elementary teachers' beliefs and educational technology use. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.
  21. Ginns, I. S., Watters, J. I., Tulips, D. F., & Lucas, K. B. (1995). Changes in preservice elementary teachers' sense of efficacy in teaching science. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb10191.x
  22. Ha, H. J., Park, H. J., Kim, J. H., & Kim, Y. J. (2012). Difficulties of biology teachers in teaching activities on the fusing 'Science' in high school. Biology Education, 40(2), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.2.267
  23. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  24. Hassinger, E. (1959). Stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociology, 24, 52-53.
  25. Holmlov, P. G., & Warneryd, K. E. (1990). Adoption and use of fax in Sweden. In M. Carnevale, M. Lucertini, & S. Nicolsia (Eds.) Modeling the innovation: Communications, automation and information systems (pp. 95-108). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  26. Igbaria, M., & Zinatelli, N. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. Management Information Science Quarterly, 21(3), 279-305.
  27. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management, 11(4), 87-114.
  28. Jeon, K. H. (2002). A study on the internet usage motivation, user characteristics, and usage behavior. Journal of Product Research, 27, 173-197.
  29. Jo, S. Y., & Cho, K. L. (2012). A study on the diffusion and adoption of e-learning among elementary school teachers: Based on Rogers' theory of diffusion of innovation. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 409-438.
  30. Jung, G. H., Choe, Y. C., Park, H. D., & Jang, I. H. (2010). Study on the relationship between factors of farmers' adoption and continuous use of innovative technology. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 42(3), 109-137.
  31. Kim, H. J., Lee, J. W., & Im, S. M. (2013). An analysis of students' interest in high school "Science" in view of the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(1), 17-29.
  32. Kim, J. Y., Oh, W., Chung, J. S., & Kim, S. W. (2012). Comparison of physics and other science teachers' conception in the 2009 revision of the high-school 'Science' curriculum. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.104
  33. Kim, S. Y. (2012). Effects of simulated instruction activities through a constructivist lens on preservice biology teachers' epistemological belief, science teaching efficacy belief and teaching motivation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(7), 1157-1168.
  34. Kim, Y. R., & Hong, H. J. (2006). A study on the acceptance of information literacy instruction for school libraries in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(3), 1-30.
  35. Kim, Y. R. (2007). A study on the influenced factors for acceptance and diffusions of information literacy instruction of school libraries (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chonnam National University.
  36. Kohler, H. P. (1997). Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice. Demography, 34(3), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/3038290
  37. Leavitt, C., & Walton, J. R. (1975). Development of a scale for innovativeness. Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 545-554.
  38. Linting, M., Meulman, J. J., Groenen, P. J. F., & van der Koojj, A. J. (2007). Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 336-358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.336
  39. Mansfiled, E., Rapport, J. Schnee, J. Wagner, S., & Hamburger, M. (1971). Research and innovation in modern corporations. New York, NY: Norton.
  40. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  41. Mort, P. R. (1953). Educational Adaptability. School Executive, 71, 1-23.
  42. Oh, Y., Jang, J., Ryu, H., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Choi, K. (2011). Analyses and comparison between science content on education for sustainable development in high school science curriculum of 2007-revised and 2009-revised. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 95-113.
  43. Park, B. (2004). Suggestions from the analysis of factors to encourage the ICT utilization in School. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 8(2), 271-282.
  44. Park, S., & Lee, B. (2012). Analysis of teachers' understanding of the changes in the physics content in the 2009 revised science national curriculum with a focus on optics. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.10
  45. Park, S. H. (2000). An investigation of the relationships among college backgrounds in science, attitudes toward teaching science, science teaching self-efficacy beliefs, and instructional strategies of elementary school teachers (1) - Based on a quantitative data analysis. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), 542-561.
  46. Park, S. H. (2006). Pedagogical content knowledge among science teachers based on teaching method, self-efficacy, and attitude on science teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(1), 122-131.
  47. Pyeon, E. J., & Park, B. H. (2005). A study on factors influencing the decision of web-based learning system (Edunet) use. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 8(5), 63-72.
  48. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  49. Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York, NY: Free Press.
  50. Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach (2nd ed. of Diffusion of innovations). New York, NY: Free Press.
  51. Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15-24.
  52. Shin, Y. O., & Choi, B. S. (2012). A survey on the management status and science teachers' perception of science in high school based on 2009 curriculum revision. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(10), 1599-1612.
  53. Song, S. C., Hong, B., Kim, N. H., Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2012). Study on perceptions of high school students and science teachers about high school fusing science. Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 130-138.
  54. Talyor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  55. Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18, 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1
  56. Valente, T. W., Watkins, S., Jato, M. N., van der Staten, A., & Tsitsol, L. P. (1997). Social network associations with contraceptive use among gameroonian woman in voluntary association. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00385-1
  57. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical information extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  58. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Science Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  59. Yang, S., Lee, S., & Jeon, S. (2010). Teachers' perception on school change program. The Journal of Politics of Education, 17(2), 65-88.
  60. Yang, Y. J., Park, B., Lim, E. S., & Jeon, S. K. (2005). A study on factors influencing the intention to use of m-learning. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 11(1), 147-165.
  61. Yoon, H. Y., Yoon, W., & Woo, A. J. (2011). High school science teachers' perceptions of the 2009 revised science curriculum and the science textbook. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 757-776.

피인용 문헌

  1. Meanings of ‘Creativity and Integration’ in Science Education and Comments on Science Classroom Culture vol.18, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2014.18.3.827
  2. A Study on the Perception of High School Students about High SchoolScience according to the 2009 Revised Science Curriculum vol.42, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2014.42.4.467
  3. Teachers' Perception Affecting the Adoption and Diffusion of Blended Learning vol.18, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2014.18.4.1347
  4. 2009 개정 과학과 교육과정의 과학 선택 과목에 대한 고등학생의 인식 조사 vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.2.133
  5. A Qualitative Case Study on the Conflicts of Science Teachers Encountering Flipped Learning Classes vol.66, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2018.66.1.359
  6. 학생들의 과학긍정경험에 영향을 주는 과학중점학교의 특성에 대한 질적 탐구 vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.4.525