Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제27권7호
  • /
  • Pages.974-980
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Water Restriction on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Organ Weights of Naked Neck and Ovambo Chickens of Southern Africa

  • Chikumba, N. (School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal) ;
  • Chimonyo, M. (School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.03
  • 심사 : 2014.01.07
  • 발행 : 2014.07.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In semi-arid areas of Southern Africa, dehydration can compromise the performance and welfare of local chickens, particularly during the growing period when confinement is curtailed and birds are left to scavenge for feed and water. The effect of water restriction on the growth performance was compared in Naked Neck (NNK) and Ovambo (OVB) chickens that are predominant in Southern Africa. A total of 54 eight-wk-old pullets each of NNK and OVB chickens with an initial average weight of $641{\pm}10g/bird$ were randomly assigned to three water intake treatments, each having six birds for 8 wk. The water restriction treatments were ad libitum, 70% of ad libitum and 40% of ad libitum intake. Nine experimental pens with a floor space of $3.3m^2$ per strain were used. The pens were housed in an open-sided house with cement floor deep littered with a 20 cm layer of untreated wood shavings. Feed was provided ad libitum. Average daily water intake (ADWI), BW at 16 weeks of age (FBW), ADG, ADFI, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and water to feed ratios (WFR) were determined. Ovambo chickens had superior (p<0.05) FBW, ADG and ADWI than NNK chickens. Body weight of birds at 16 weeks of age, ADG, ADFI, ADWI, and WFR declined progressively (p<0.05) with increasing severity of water restriction while FCR values increased (p<0.05) as the severity of water restriction increased. Naked Neck chickens had better FCR at the 40% of ad libitum water intake level than Ovambo chickens. The dressing percentage per bird was higher in water restricted birds than those on ad libitum water consumption, irrespective of strain. Heart weight was significantly lower in birds on 40% of ad libitum water intake than those on ad libitum and 70% of ad libitum water intake, respectively. In conclusion, NNK chickens performed better than OVB chickens under conditions of water restriction and would be ideal to raise for meat and egg production in locations where water shortages are a major challenge.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdelsamie, R. E. and F. Yadiwilo. 1981. Water consumption and effects of water restriction on performance of broilers in the tropics. Br. Poult. Sci. 22:423-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071688108447905
  2. Ahmed, A. S. and M. A. Alamer. 2011. Effect of short-term water restriction on body weight, egg production, and immune response of local and commercial layers in the late phase of production. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 24:825-833. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10335
  3. Aklilu, H. A., C. J. M. Almekinders, H. M. J. Udo, and A. J. van der Zijpp. 2007. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 39:165-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9002-8
  4. Arad, Z. 1982. Effect of water deprivation and heat exposure on body weight loss and drinking capacity in four breeds of fowl (Gallus Domesticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 73A:297-299.
  5. Austin, J. C., D. N. du Toit, P. L. Fraser, D. Mansfield, A. Macleod, J. S. J. Odendaal, and J. Seier. 2004. Guidelines on ethics for medical research: Use of animals in research and training. South African Medical Research Council. pp. 1-53.
  6. Belay, T. and R. G. Teeter. 1993. Broiler water balance and thermobalance during thermoneutral and high ambienttemperature exposure. Poult. Sci. 72:116-124. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720116
  7. Buhr, R. J., J. K. Northcutt, and C. E. Lyon. 1998. Influence of time off feed on broiler viscera weight, diameter and shear. Poult. Sci. 77:758-764. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.5.758
  8. Cahaner, A., N. Deeb, and M. Gutman. 1993. The effects of the plumage-reducing Naked Neck (Na) gene on the performance of fast growing broilers at normal and high ambient temperature. Poult. Sci. 72:767-775. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720767
  9. Chikumba, N., H. Swatson, and M. Chimonyo. 2013. Haematological and serum biochemical responses of chickens to hydric stress. Animal 7:1517-1522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111300102X
  10. Deeb, N. and A. Cahaner. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction with broiler genotypes differing in growth rate 1. The effects of high ambient temperatures and naked neck genotype on lines differing in genetic background. Poult. Sci. 80:695-702. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.6.695
  11. Feddes, J. J. R., E. J. Emmanuel and M. J. Zuidhof. 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult. Sci. 81: 774-779. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.774
  12. Kellerup, S. U., J. E. Parker, and G. H. Arscott. 1965. Effect of restricted water consumption on broilers chickens. Poult. Sci. 44:79-83.
  13. Leeson, S. and J. D. V. Summers. 2000. Broiler and breeder production:nutrition and feeding (Guelph University Books)
  14. Manning, L., S. A. Chadd, and R. N. Baines. 2007. Water consumption in broiler chicken: A welfare indicator. World's Poult. Sci. J. 63:63-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001274
  15. Mapiye, C., M. Mwale, J. F. Mupangwa, M. Chimonyo, R. Foti, and M. J. Mutenje. 2008. A research review of village chicken production constraints and opportunities in Zimbabwe. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1680-1688. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.r.07
  16. Miller, L., G. W. Morgan, and J. W. Deaton. 1988. Cyclic watering of broiler cockerels. Poult. Sci. 67:378-383. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670378
  17. Mupeta, B., J. Wood, F. Mandonga, and J. Mhlanga. 2000. A comparison of the performance of village chickens, under improved feed management, with the performance of hybrid chickens in tropical Zimbabwe. In: Sustaining livestock in challenging dry season environments: Strategies for smallscale livestock farmers (Eds. T. Smith and S. H. Godfrey). Proceedings of the third workshop on livestock production programme projects. 2000 September 26-28; Ingwe lodge and ICRISAT, Matobo, Zimbabwe.
  18. Mwale, M. and P. J. Masika. 2009. Ethno-veterinary control of parasites, management and role of village chickens in rural households of Centane district in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 41:1685-1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9366-z
  19. NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 8. revised Edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 155.
  20. Pires, D. L., E. B. Malheiros, and I. C. Boleli. 2007. Influence of sex, age, and fasting on blood parameters and bursa, spleen and yolk sac weights of broiler chicks. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 9: 221-228.
  21. Proudman, J. A. and H. Opel. 1981. Effect of feed or water restriction on basal and TRH-stimulated growth hormone secretion in the growing turkey poult. Poult. Sci. 60:659-667. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600659
  22. Saengchan, Y., N. Gongruttananum, R. Chotesangasa, and P. Tumkiratiwong. 2008. Effects of restriction of water consumption on egg and eggshell quality, fecal moisture contents, hematology and reproductive performance in laying hens. Proceedings of the 46th Kasetsart University Annual Conference, Kasetsart. Anim. Vet. Med. 195-204.
  23. Saleh, G. A. M.1992. Comparative Studies on the Performance of Some Broiler Hybrids under Certain Feeding System. PhD Thesis, Animal Production Department, Minia University, Egypt.
  24. SAS. 2010. SAS User Guide: Release 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
  25. Swatson, H. K. 2003. The small holder poultry development workshop: The Potential of smallholder indigenous poultry production in improving the livelihoods and food security of rural households. Proceedings of Nature and Development Group of Africa in Action for Sustainable Rural Development, 2003 October 28-31; University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
  26. Van Marle-Koster, E. and L. H. Nel. 2000. Genetic characterization of native southern African chicken populations: Evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 30:1-6.
  27. Van Marle-Koster, E. and N. H. Casey. 2001. Phenotypic characterisation of native chicken lines in South Africa. Anim. Genet. Resour. Inf. 29:71-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900001425
  28. Viola, T. H., A. M. Ribeiro, A. M. Junior, and E. S.Viola. 2009. Influence of water restriction on the performance and organ development of young broilers. R. Bras. Zootec. 38:323-327.
  29. Ziaei, N., J. H. Guy, S. A. Edwards, P. J. Blanchard, J. Ward, and D. Feuerstein. 2007. Effect of gender on factors affecting excreta dry matter content of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16:226-233. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.2.226

피인용 문헌

  1. Tonic immobility, heterophil to lymphocyte ratio, and organ weights in slow-growing chickens pp.1537-0437, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfw066
  2. Effects of strain and sex on the behaviour of free-range slow-growing chickens raised in a hot environment vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1287079
  3. Physiological Responses of Slow-Growing Chickens under Diurnally Cycling Temperature in a Hot Environment vol.19, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0485
  4. Responses of gut morphology, serum biochemistry, and quality of breast meat to water deprivation in broilers vol.100, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0221
  5. The effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid supplementation on growth performances, immune responses, and blood parameters of chickens reared under stressful environment: a meta-analysis vol.28, pp.33, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13855-0
  6. The genetic basis and robustness of naked neck mutation in chicken vol.53, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02505-1